Samsung to show a 5" Full HD Super AMOLED display at CES in January, might go in the Galaxy S IV
0. phoneArena 16 Nov 2012, 02:55 posted on
The official said the display is 4.99", pegging the pixel density at 441ppi, which is pretty close to the perfect human vision. A combination of the current FMM production method, which is suitable for mass production, and the more advanced LITI technology, which is cheaper, but can't be scaled sufficiently, might be used to arrive at the 5-incher with 1920x1080 resolution...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. someones4 (Posts: 622; Member since: 16 Sep 2012)
This better be good, Samsung. otherwise, the Sony Yuga may overtake you.
18. MeoCao (unregistered)
For GS4 1080p is a must, and HTC screen perhaps is impossible to beat with a AMOLED.
Still I think GS4 will be a success but not b-c of the screen.
22. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
but because of also the Exynos A15.
27. yajia1 (Posts: 119; Member since: 22 Aug 2012)
And because of innovations like multi-window.
31. metalpoet (unregistered)
I want my gs4 to have 5' HD 1080p screen, with 4.2 android(key lime pie) quadcore, multi window. and will cook me dinner and wash my car! haha!
2. nobelset (Posts: 270; Member since: 17 Oct 2012)
ok. 5.8 inches. I'm fine with that, but please don't make it bigger than 6 inch anymore. I have a note 2, it was quite big when I started using it, now I got used to it and it perfectly suites my style. BUT more than 0.5 inches larger than that wouldn't be called a phone, you can barely hold it to call someone for a decent duration of time!
16. Topcat488 (Posts: 1207; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
Mr./Mrs. -@nobelset- I have to disagree with you on this one. We the people of the "Phablet" world. Do hereby demand our ratio of 16:10 screen display back!!! 16:9 is a ratio of smartphone user; We are the "Party of Phablet"... And use our Phablets, we will.
Here’s what Yusim proposes when designing the Galaxy Note 2:
6.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus display with 1080 x 1920 Full HD resolution
Size: 161.9 x 84.9 x 8.9
2.0GHz quad core Cortex-A15 processor
3GB of RAM
16-meagpixel camera with Auto Focus, LED Flash and BSI
3-megapixel front-facing camera with BSI, Best Photo, Best Faces, Low light shot
Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n (2.4GHz and 5GHz), Wi-Fhi Direct
USB 3.0 Host
A-GPS, Glonass support
"This should be just in time for the Note III though"... Here's to HOPING. :)
17. someones4 (Posts: 622; Member since: 16 Sep 2012)
The problem is that there are always wasted space on the phone. Thick bezels or space for manufacturer's logo. The logos always take up a lot of space.
20. SGSatlantis (Posts: 205; Member since: 20 Jul 2011)
The logos don't take up space, they just fill it. There are components that can't be placed behind the screen(front camera, earphone, sensors, and i guess some internals), also the Galaxy Nexus doesn't have a logo on the front.
30. someones4 (Posts: 622; Member since: 16 Sep 2012)
However, since manufacturers have claimed to produce some of the world's thinnest displays at only a few mm's , i hardly think that that particular excuse is still valid.
32. metalpoet (unregistered)
if only they would make them edge(left side) to edge(right side) to edge(top) and leave the bottom for the S voice home button then they could fit a huge screen on a small phone :) put the manufacture and carrier stuff on the back where it belongs. we know who made the phone and who are carrier is, we dont need a reminder lol
19. galanoth (Posts: 383; Member since: 26 Nov 2011)
You want 16:10 back but you're endorsing "6.3-inch Super AMOLED Plus display with 1080 x 1920 Full HD resolution" which is 16:9?
You should want 1920 x 1200.
3. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)
BRING ON ODIN!
4. tiara6918 (Posts: 1910; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
I'm excited to see that eye popping full hd super amoled display!
25. andro. (Posts: 1986; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)
20/20 vison. Maximum ppi for the perfect human eye is around 477ppi according to tests not to be confused with apples claim originally to try promote the iphone 4 that it was roughly 300ppi.
6. darkskoliro (Posts: 1054; Member since: 07 May 2012)
With the pentile display, the odd number of pixels and weird placings make the screen look funny, and gets worse as the ppi goes down. Like on a galaxy s, the voodoo sound icon is absolutely munted. Although with the rgb placement of note 2, its still got one massive blue pixel, does that effect the display? or not really?
but anyway, hope to see a full even rgb from samsung!
7. harsh_doshi (Posts: 36; Member since: 27 Aug 2012)
the only thing samsung seems to be doin with thier flagships is beefing up the specs and the screen size...i mean ders no innovation!..dont take it in the wrong way but all i say is ders room for more innovative features in their phones!..
9. p0rkguy (Posts: 684; Member since: 23 Nov 2010)
This is all we know for hardware.
We know nothing on the software.
This year Samsung came out on top in the software department and we barely even knew anything until launch week.
10. Topcat488 (Posts: 1207; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
UHa, what? Samsung makes many different sizes and shapes of phones, also for different OSes. I'm a OG-Note user, getting ready to get multi-window, airview, & all kinds of smart updates that go with the upgrade. You got to be kidding right? The Note III will be a Beast!!! You must be using another smartphone iHTC or ect...; or you're not reading these articles with your eyes open. :/
11. someones4 (Posts: 622; Member since: 16 Sep 2012)
Pray tell, what would you consider innovation? a jet pack or antimatter batteries. Perhaps an interdimensional transporter?
8. blackspot (Posts: 102; Member since: 14 Nov 2012)
Wow, these phones are really getting bigger & bigger each year. After my time is done with the Galaxy S3, I am seriously considering reverting back to a phone with a 4.3" display. I kind of miss the ergonomics of a phone that size.
12. p0rkguy (Posts: 684; Member since: 23 Nov 2010)
If they can make the S4 size a bit smaller and have a 5" screen, I'm all for it.
Hell, make the screen bendable so I can open my phone like a flip phone and get more screen size.
15. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Well, the DNA showed that a 5 inch can fit within less width than the s3' frame.
And it's only 5mm taller.
And there's still some vertical room left, even without the on screen keys.
Anyway I'm pretty sure Samsung won't make the S4 larger than the s3 is
13. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
I prefer AMOLED..at retina level and with correct calibration, this should leave nothing to LCD screens
21. twens (Posts: 842; Member since: 25 Feb 2012)
One reason i always buy samsung is because of amoled. If its going full hd now then thats an extra good news for me. Phonearena can blub all they like but am still down with amoleds.lcd just doesnt cut it for me. Wish my 46" tv was also amoled.
23. redmd (Posts: 1018; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)
yeah if it's LED it's Samsung. though some would prefer LCD I would respect that.
24. 1ceTr0n (Posts: 545; Member since: 20 May 2012)
So now Samsungs screen suck? Man, I really hate now fast technology changes in the cell phone market, makes me tired of hearing about it, even as an IT guy
26. archangel9 (Posts: 231; Member since: 07 Feb 2010)
The heat is on for HD 1080p display screens. Now as for the GS4 my only wish ...is that it comes w/S Pen.
28. lboogy82788 (Posts: 22; Member since: 09 Jan 2012)
Dont be suprised if this display is actually there "YOUM" tech, you know the flexible AMOLED. Samsung has already started mass production and there preparing a complete over haul of there smart phone line. Hell, Samsung is probably on track to developing 2k screens! You never know whats going on behind closed doors.
29. The_Innovation (Posts: 585; Member since: 18 Jul 2012)
One very important, if not the most important, aspect for all these devices is the battery. They need to at least put in a 3000 mAh battery in them. Who needs these super high ppi 1080P resolution phones if the battery drops to 60% from 100% after updating a few statuses and viewing a few videos on YouTube?
The Droid DNA was 'almost' perfect, if the battery was 3000+ mAh. The Note II is perfect in that sense, except it's not a 1080P screen.
Personally, I'd rather have a 720P screen with great battery life. Doubt my eye will really tell the difference.