(Posts: 2016; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)
That fine probably won't hurt them one bit.
(Posts: 323; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)
go home sammy you're drunk
(Posts: 196; Member since: 23 Jul 2012)
Now this is small fine, now tell us, dear PA "experts", about the $1 billion due to Apple? PS: which ones of the PA employees "are all eagerly awaiting to learn more about the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S IV..."?
The only way the asian manufacturers understand is the court and fines way. Otherwise they will keep on stealing, like they always do.
(Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)
Did this article mention Apple? If not let's see if you get warned for TROLLING or will be excused because you mentioned Apple. Someone sued Apple in US for fake advertising from SJ about Glass on iPHONE but pathetic as it is always... Apple was not fined for "false advertising" because it was American court, American self styled mesiah of tech world (though he was more of a theft and repackaging guru) and complainant was a simple "customer". So if you were itching to mention Apple in this artticle you should have mentioned this rather than drag in irrelevant crap. Looks like taiwan's FTC is more honest in things than you know who ...
As for 1 billion ... keep dreaming of getting even half of that alongwith Apple team ... it may come in next decade hopefully ... if that bhappens .. till then it's best 1 billion dollar free ad campaign for samsung where no can im pose any fine for false advertising because this time it's Apple who is doing it :)
(Posts: 83; Member since: 30 Dec 2012)
I don't see why camera phones with no flash exist! Don't need to omit that to cut down costs
* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.