x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Samsung seeks new trial, calling jury verdict "unreasonable and unsupported"

0. phoneArena 23 Sep 2012, 05:23 posted on

While Apple seeks more money from Samsung based on a filing made Friday, Samsung seeks to have a whole new trial after telling Judge Lucy Koh that the jury's original verdict, which awarded $1.05 billion to Apple, was unreasonable...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 12:02

81. Hemlocke (unregistered)


It's a dual core that uses A15 architectural elements, like VFPv4 and new memory controllers, but it is designed by Apple. The A6 is more advanced than the Exynos 4412 quad, and the CPU is just as advanced as the CPU in the Qualcomm S4 Pro, but the A6 GPU is much better than the Adreno 320.
Quad core != more advanced.

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 12:57

87. GODLOVESAPPLE (Posts: 8; Member since: 23 Sep 2012)


Correction, there is more Justice in the US of A, I can't say never been bought or will never be bought Judges, but I wouldn't go as far as saying, "there is no justice in the States," you must be from the 3rd world, to say such ignoramus, & irresponsible comment.

"There is more Justice in the USA, why millions migrated to the USA year after year?"

1. to escape persecution from your 3rd world corrupted Judges, Politicians, etc.
2. life is better in the USA, more choices

I could go on and on...

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 13:32 1

88. prakesh (Posts: 92; Member since: 13 Sep 2012)


they are racist in sports entairment industries music etc. in politics in tech and many more

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 13:34 3

89. Danalvi1981 (Posts: 49; Member since: 02 Jun 2010)


All flip phones and Bar phones back in the days looked the same. Maybe the companies should have sued each other. All of the phones had the same green neon screen and black type writer looking letters. Cellphones will always be similar looking. Apple phones just all look the same and very little has changed. Let Android live!!!!

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 13:42 1

91. tedkord (Posts: 13031; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


Because capacitive screens were a relatively new phenomenon at the time. Someone had to be first (and it was LG, not Apple, BTW).

The Prada, the F700 and the Sony designs that Apple were so interested in, clearly show that the rectangle with rounded corners dominated by a centered touchscreen and minimal buttons was the natural evolution of the smartphone, not the invention of Apple. How else do you explain so many coming to the same basic design at the same time?

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 13:44 2

92. tedkord (Posts: 13031; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


Don't worry about it. What with the damned auto correct, half my posts look like I don't speak English as a first our second language.

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 13:50 2

95. androidrockzz (Posts: 51; Member since: 04 Feb 2012)


true,
2 days back apple was caught copying ideas from others, mainly the clock design and so on.
Apple needs money to spend for the cases upcoming against them from other companies..
IF THEY ARE IN NEED OF MONEY JUST ASK DIRECTLY TO SAMSUNG "PLEASE LEND US SOME MONEY" :-)

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 14:09 4

98. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)


If Apple can steal and copy and go scott free then others should also be allowed to steal and copy. Apple was in dodrums until it started lifting/stealing/copying. Even that sometimes they failed to dish out nice product ... Look at "TIM TOM" version of "TOM TOM" what Apple calls Apple Maps ...

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 14:40 2

103. synot (Posts: 277; Member since: 14 Sep 2012)


Idiot ,Samsung phones wasnt sold on design but functionality and appeal in their software and bigger screens and Samsung didnt steal anything from Apple because first apple dont have any tech or design of their own ,in fact the tech in Apple is made by Samsung including the A6 chip that powers the Iphone 5.research before u write and dont be an apple stooge

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 15:44 3

107. willard12 (Posts: 1857; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


Samsung F700.....look it up, then shut-up

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 17:03 1

109. tha.fox (Posts: 100; Member since: 30 Nov 2011)


thats like saying if apple had made a flip phone it would have infringed on lg samsung and motorola for having a phone that flips

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 17:09 1

110. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


Not by much, just store representative jobs, HQ jobs, and some call centers. They don't pay taxes, they don't manufacture anything here, and they do little for the U.S. economy due to the fact the money taken from device sales goes to offshore accounts.

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 17:14 3

111. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


I happen to be an ex owner of Samsung f 700, and it just puzzles me beyond belief how Samsung legal team could've miss to add that phone to their case on time.

It has almost EXACT design as the first galaxy phone, save for the hardware keyboard - beyond any doubt establishing the reference point for the galaxy line.
It was also relatively popular(in Europe) and decent phone.
Here's a nice review:

http://m.gsmarena.com/samsung_f700-review-227.php

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 17:47

112. MobileCaseReview (Posts: 242; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2008-10-16-204589872_x.htm

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 18:03

113. archangel9 (Posts: 233; Member since: 07 Feb 2010)


Unfortunately here Troll a bunch of corrupt judges and isheep judges and jurors at that.I believe this is how the Trayvon Martin trial gonna be

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 18:04

114. archangel9 (Posts: 233; Member since: 07 Feb 2010)


Right on!!!That's all I use

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 19:08

115. remixfa (Posts: 14471; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


Which I believe was exactly the same as the Samsung Glyde on VZW.

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 23:28

127. Pdubb (Posts: 248; Member since: 08 Aug 2011)


That's what Apple has done! Copy -steal- lie- cheat should be their motto not "Think differently"! I'm a big technology fan and I think that Apple is hypocritical with these patents. They are picking on Android because it is open source. That means they can take from Android "maybe" improve the feature all without a second thought on if they will be sued.

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 23:31

128. Pdubb (Posts: 248; Member since: 08 Aug 2011)


Explain "an iPhone copy" because according to Apple it IS almost any phone with a touchscreen.

posted on 24 Sep 2012, 02:20

130. rf1975 (Posts: 259; Member since: 01 Aug 2011)


It is not a proof dude. It is a evident that Samsung became success after copying apple. When you copy something you have to match its appearance as well as the grade. Galaxy Ace is low end device. by seeing the pixelated icon and text people never thing to hold that in the hand. That is why SGS 2 became success.

posted on 24 Sep 2012, 06:00 3

132. remixfa (Posts: 14471; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


yea, because the SGS3 looks loo much like an iphone..

You forget, Samsung was ALREADY one of the worlds largest phone makers when the SGS1 came out. They weren't exactly struggling.

posted on 24 Sep 2012, 11:05

134. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 15725; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


I just believe in fair justice.

posted on 26 Sep 2012, 16:56

140. Hemlocke (unregistered)


The Prada was almost simultaneous, but we know from the Apple patents that it had been in development longer. No matter there.

The F700? Resistive, fat, QWERTY, dumbphone that came AFTER the iPhone? What is there to say to that?

Where were Sony's phones? Only LG launched one in 2007, with Flash OS, and they threatened lawsuit, but never filed. Why do you think that is? I imagine it was because they found out they were behind the curve.

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 08:48 7

32. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Apple copies, copied LG and SONY, and no one say's nothing it's okay for them. Biased.

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 05:27 31

2. whysoserious (Posts: 318; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)


Samsung has a point.

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 06:28 9

7. prakesh (Posts: 92; Member since: 13 Sep 2012)


amen!!!

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 08:11 1

19. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 15725; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


No they don't.

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 08:21 3

25. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Don't hold your breath waiting for judge Koh to grant Sammy's motion for a new trial. They are basically asking her to admit she screwed up in managing the trial. Sammy has a better chance on appeal - if the verdict is tossed, a new trial is the inevitable outcome. If Sammy can prove judicial bias, they can get another judge assigned to the new trial.

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 09:57 1

54. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


iv'e course they do!

posted on 23 Sep 2012, 12:01 1

80. whysoserious (Posts: 318; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)


No you don't so please do yourself a favor and just gtfo.^_^

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories