Samsung reigns supreme over the US smartwatch market, Pebble is also important
0. phoneArena 11 Jun 2014, 19:21 posted on
Samsung and Pebble sold $96 million worth of smartwatches in the US since October last year, with Samsung grabbing the largest share of revenue...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. nlbates66 (Posts: 328; Member since: 15 Aug 2012)
this also means, after the update to the gear 1 devices, that tizen suddenly takes smartwatch marketshare. :)
2. nctx77 (Posts: 1965; Member since: 03 Sep 2013)
Remember what Nokia and blackberry market share was back in the day pre iphone? Apple is always fashionably late. Enjoy it while it last.
3. willard12 (Posts: 1686; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
Remember what iphone's market share was yesterday? Enjoyed it while it lasted.
4. Droidrapist (Posts: 186; Member since: 28 May 2014)
Look up the Forbes article about Apple still making more money from iPhone than Android despite the fact that they have less of the market share. xD You can't buy s**t with 'marketshare' - its a meaningless f**knig term. Its like saying you dominate the marketshare for selling PBR vs. Dom Perignon. The fine champagne still pulling in more cash.
5. Droidrapist (Posts: 186; Member since: 28 May 2014)
Remember 'Android' comes in $19.99 cheapo phones at Wal Mart, so they make but a penny out of these phones. iOS only comes in Apple hardware. Hence the profits will always be greater. SO just cuz you have a bunch of broke idiots with pre paid android phones doesn't mean this huge market of phones = more money.
9. willard12 (Posts: 1686; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
When market share is 14%, yet you own 75% of profits that is impressive. That also means you've convinced people to pay $700 for a phone that costs $197 to make. It means that there are people who pay a high price for a cheap device. You're getting screwed and bragging about Apple's ability to screw you. Furthermore, Apple makes most of its sales from the US where people buy them subsidized. So, those "broke idiots" at wal-mart aren't paying much less than most iPhone users at $199 on a 2 year contract. While you say people buy "cheap androids," fry cooks at McDonald's have no problem adding $25 to their T Mobile to look cool with their iphone.
10. Droidrapist (Posts: 186; Member since: 28 May 2014)
Very rarely do peope pay full price for an iPhone. Usually the carriers are the ones taking that hit and making the money on the back end, hence the 2 year contract. Apple isn't 'screwing' anyone ask any iPhone user, 97% will tell you they LOVE their phone. BTW you can get an iPhone 5s in Target for $119 plus a 10% off discount at cartwheel - $108 for an iPhone 5s. Who is getting screwed? Nobody. Everyone that walks out of here with an iPhone gets a killer deal, then they can sell the f**king thing 2 years later for $150 which is more than what they paid for it lol.
13. willard12 (Posts: 1686; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
There goes your iphones are for rich people and android is for poor idiots who can't afford iphone argument. Now, if you can explain your way out of the original argument (14% market share) given then facts you just laid out with your $108 iphone 5s I'll be really impressed. One minute, android has such high market share because poor people are lined up at wal-mart buying cheap droids. The next minute, people can line- up at target to buy cheap iphones. You're going to have to settle the debate within your own mind.
11. Droidrapist (Posts: 186; Member since: 28 May 2014)
BTW next time you order a pizza form Papa Johns or Pizza Hut, remember that Pizza only cost $1.50 to make and you paid $14.99 for it! Woopty do. Welcome to 'business'! Its how people make money lol xD
14. willard12 (Posts: 1686; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)
Instead of comparing phones to pizza, why not phones to phones. Every high-end android costs more to make than the cheaply produced iphone. Apple charges a much higher mark-up.....hence the profits you rave about even with lower sales. It is business and I give Apple credit for convincing people to pay higher for a cheaper product. However, I don't give credit to their customers.
6. Droidrapist (Posts: 186; Member since: 28 May 2014)
And I also hope you don't mean their stock price difference means they lost market share, they just increased the number of shares 7:1. It's still the same amount of shares. That's the only thing that has changed in the last day or so...
8. tenho1982 (Posts: 68; Member since: 29 Dec 2013)
Yes, sadly because of this thinking, Samsung needs Apple to be in the smart watch industry so that smart watches attract more attention from the consumers and it is at that time that Samsung will gain more sales.
7. gigaraga (Posts: 1454; Member since: 29 Mar 2013)
That was to be expected. The other smart watches are simply not good enough to come close to Samsungs implementation. Now ppl will release that.
12. express77 (unregistered)
I'm waiting for smartwatch screen size war. Imagine a 5 inch smartwatch.
15. joey_sfb (Posts: 5741; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)
I am waiting for my 8 inches gauntlet with 2000 lumen projection up to 150 inches