x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Samsung declined the opportunity to license Apple's patents in 2010

0. phoneArena 11 Aug 2012, 00:50 posted on

The latest from the Apple v. Samsung patent trial is that the Korean based manufacturer received an offer from Apple in 2010 to license the use of the Cupertino based firm's patents and would even offer Sammy a 20% discount if they decided to cross-license their patents to Apple...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 01:03 8

1. sid8911 (Posts: 54; Member since: 29 May 2010)


aww cmon sammy :(

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 01:06 4

2. sid8911 (Posts: 54; Member since: 29 May 2010)


nvm disregard what i said

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 06:47 12

42. sudhar131998 (Posts: 63; Member since: 06 Sep 2011)


did you notice that the iphone in the picture doesn't fit the name of the iphone 4 given below

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 12:59 2

69. Hammerfest (Posts: 383; Member since: 12 May 2012)


Those prices would be TOTALLY REASONABLE... if Samsung charged hand over foot for its devices like Apple does...

When you make over 50% profit in sales to the carrier alone, your greedy, ergo Apple.

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 14:51

77. smartphone (Posts: 160; Member since: 21 Oct 2011)


Even then $30 per handset for using a rectangular design and black colour would be unjustified.
Patent licensees should be of genuine innovation.

And who on the earth had bought an iPhone and realised its a galaxy S when he got home.

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 01:07 34

3. doejon (Posts: 398; Member since: 31 Jul 2012)


dont do it sammy!
i can not describe how much i hate apple
who the f**k gave apple these design patents

such ordinary shapes must dont alowed to patent..

sorry 4 my bad english

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 01:53 23

8. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


LG have to sue apple for prada phone design !!!!

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 02:13 8

15. kunyuk (Posts: 56; Member since: 29 Jun 2012)


Tim cook is addicted to rectangular design, lol

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 03:18 24

20. android_hitman (unregistered)


what??? to pay 30-40$?? for something that apple stole?

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 09:29 2

51. monkeytown (Posts: 125; Member since: 26 Jul 2012)


i pity you :(

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 04:14 12

25. Nikolas.Oliver (banned) (Posts: 1574; Member since: 01 Jul 2012)


why apple doesn't sue xperia s since it has rectangular design too

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 04:56 8

31. HiddenStones (Posts: 5; Member since: 03 Aug 2012)


It's just the beginning.... more patent wars are coming after this if Apple wins.

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 06:14 3

38. ahomad (Posts: 175; Member since: 15 May 2012)


no way, xperia design are not smooth rounded corners. its actually the farest anyone could get from apples stupid design.

don't forget apple is making loads of money from selling entertainments from itunes which is originally got from sony. in addition, sony has far more stronger patent protfilio compared to samsung (sony has great history compared to samsung, sad they not doing well recently). thats why you have never heard anyone sued sony especially apple

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 07:57 1

45. Nikolas.Oliver (banned) (Posts: 1574; Member since: 01 Jul 2012)


then how about oppo finder ?http://briefmobile.s3.amazonaws.com/images/article s/2012/07/oppo-finder.png

it looks identical with iPhone 4, it has a smooth rounded corners

posted on 13 Aug 2012, 08:09

90. kunyuk (Posts: 56; Member since: 29 Jun 2012)


It's similar but it's different, just like cars if you know what i mean

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 10:42 3

60. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


It smells like ban is coming...

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 01:18 24

4. D.Aceveda (Posts: 396; Member since: 30 Jun 2012)


Quit crying Apple

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 01:52 7

7. XPERIA-KNIGHT (unregistered)


.....lol

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 10:14 3

57. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 14187; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


How is that crying? It would have been easier for Samsung to just do the license and avoid the legal fiasco of copying many of Apple's designs and patents.

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 10:24 2

59. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


Does the court have proved that ?

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 12:02 2

63. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 14187; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


Proved what? There was an article PA did that flat out confirmed it.

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 12:19 2

65. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


Does the court have proved that Samsung is (as you say) "copying many of Apple's designs and patents" ?

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 20:09 1

84. joey_sfb (Posts: 6005; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)


Even if Apple do get that $30 to $40 dollar from Samsung.

What will you as Apple user get? Nothing.

I am an Apple product user and i still pay their premium price tag recently brought lower due to competition. Android competition to be specific.

Apple iPhone will be getting their 4" screen and that thanks to what?? I am very surprise that iFan don think for their self interest but choose to be trap in Apple Reality Distortion Field.

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 13:17

75. stealthd (unregistered)


Does you have English?

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 13:26

76. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)


English what?

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 12:45 6

66. willard12 (Posts: 1722; Member since: 04 Jul 2012)


Let's see...Microsoft gets about $5 on some android phones sold in the US. Microsoft makes more on Android than its own WP devices. Apple wants $30-$40 dollars per hand set! You and Alan F are as crazy as Apple and Lucy Koh.

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 15:30 3

79. D.Aceveda (Posts: 396; Member since: 30 Jun 2012)


Apple is crying because they are making the most money. Yet you are suing Samsung because? Wake up.

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 01:19 6

5. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


If the $30/unit license fee is for all Apple patents, Sammy made a bit of a boo-boo. It will be interesting to see where the license fee gets pegged. MS is getting somewhere in the range of $10 to $15 per unit, that number certainly will be floated by Sammy as to why Apple was over-reaching.

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 02:04 4

12. Lucas777 (Posts: 2137; Member since: 06 Jan 2011)


i think microsoft has fewer patents however… and they are against android itself i believe, so samsung decided it would be harder to deal with than the design patents from apple… i guess they saw apple as a pushover in 2010-- and who knows they might have counter offered and apple refused, but at least we know apple was trying

posted on 11 Aug 2012, 02:28 3

17. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


The problem for Sammy (in the absence of testimony on any counter-offer by Sammy) is that Apple is setting Sammy up for willful infringement, which carries a treble-damages penalty. They story line runs basically as follows: Hey, we offered you a deal on licensing our patents and you gave us the middle-fingered wave. Now we should be paid treble damages to teach you a lesson for giving us the middle-fingered wave.

The un-answered question is whether the license offered was for all of Apple's patent portfolio, or whether it was for just the design patents. I suspect it was for the entire portfolio, but don't know for sure.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories