Samsung already planning an 8-core ARM chip
0. phoneArena 20 Nov 2012, 19:49 posted on
We knew that quad-core chips wouldn't be the end of the line for mobile devices, but we expected that they'd get a few years of maturation before the next step of processor evolution came. But, it looks like Samsung is already planning 8-core ARM chips...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
3. MeoCao (unregistered)
This actually the measure to save battery life.
4 small cores for normal tasks
4 powerful cores for heavy duty
Come on Sammy, use the chip for GS4.
15. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2657; Member since: 26 May 2011)
Apparently never bothered to read the article either...
17. cretinick (Posts: 147; Member since: 25 Jan 2011)
You didn't even bother to read the text, did you? Just read the title and made the comment...
45. whysoserious (Posts: 316; Member since: 20 Jul 2012)
Quad core is already an overkill. 8 cores would be like killing the other competitors, resurrecting them and killing them once again.
46. flamencoguy (Posts: 89; Member since: 04 Aug 2012)
All the better to leapfrog Apple and give iFans something to think about. Let Apple play catch up.
2. GoBears (Posts: 335; Member since: 27 Apr 2012)
Samsung's innovation is really pushing boundaries every day. I love it.
4. No_Nonsense (Posts: 826; Member since: 17 Aug 2012)
Since when is adding more cores to a processor/phone a good thing? Plus its based on ARM architecture, so where is Sammy innovating?
11. MeoCao (unregistered)
This is not as easy as it sounds. SS is successful where TI failed miserably. TI has much more experience in chip making by the way.
20. MC1123 (Posts: 1236; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
TI "failed" coz they are an american company that get huge profit!
14. REYNER (Posts: 187; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
and if not innovation then what do you call it? adding core may risk the battery-life but it gives a phone a better processing speed 3Dgaming experience HD video taking and more.. its a progress and progress always leads to innovation
23. cretinick (Posts: 147; Member since: 25 Jan 2011)
Innovation is also taking things and ideas that already exist, combine them and turn them into something better than what existed before.
32. bayusuputra (Posts: 941; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)
So putting two sets of quad-cores, and make them to be able to switch with each other in order to save battery is not innovation?
It's innovation in terms of how it works, not the number of cores..
and no, they are not adding more cores, at any given time, there are only 4 cores running.. Isn't that the same as the usual quad cores?
You should start talking like your nickname.. be ashamed of your own nick..
44. flamencoguy (Posts: 89; Member since: 04 Aug 2012)
You obviously do not know or appreciate what it takes to add more cores. Just look at Intel and how long it took them to advance to the next level of multicores. The lines have to be small enough for one to get put more cores in the same size die.
34. Oxygen (Posts: 79; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)
I totally agree! I went from apple to sony to samsung. If samsung keep going this way, i think i'm going to stick to their products for a long time.
35. nacho69 (Posts: 21; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
I'll switch to Sammy when they use imagination gpu's in their chips.
5. Nocturne (Posts: 24; Member since: 21 May 2012)
Technically an eight core, but in a practical sense only 4 will be working at a time correct?
So battery life will remain relatively similar, but performance will once again do a huge jump:D
4+4 big.LITTLE FTW!
28. cretinick (Posts: 147; Member since: 25 Jan 2011)
In some cases, I think that the battery life will be much better than the today processors.
In theory, only in more elaborated games the consumption will be close of the today's consumption. In all other scenarios it will be much better... In theory...
6. someones4 (Posts: 618; Member since: 16 Sep 2012)
I imagine that this is for tablets. Although i hope the s4 will sport one of these babies.
7. masterchina (Posts: 50; Member since: 27 Sep 2011)
SWEET! my contract should be up by the time this rolls out.
8. cncrim (Posts: 477; Member since: 15 Aug 2011)
All core sound so awesome, but can have 8, 12 ,16..... 48 cores and without developer write program to support it all those cores will just sitting there doing nothing. More core is alway welcome, it will help my battery stay on longer IF SOMEONE figure out how to power management it.
9. REYNER (Posts: 187; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
wow!! if the said rumors turns out to be true.. my prediction is right that in the year 2014 there will be a 14-core in a phone! LOl! well you cant blame me for every year core seems to double from 2010(1ghz) 2011 (dual-core) 2012(quad-core).. but anyways, way to go i commend samsung for expanding the limit of nowadays innovation
10. gallitoking (Posts: 4684; Member since: 17 May 2011)
We always hear rumors of Samsung doing this and that. (flexible screens etc..) that we have yet to see, this only means that they are doing test on this.. it may be a while before we see them. so please enjoy your quad- cores..
25. protozeloz (Posts: 5371; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
Do not sorry iPhone 10 will have a quad core...
36. gallitoking (Posts: 4684; Member since: 17 May 2011)
iOS can do quadcore whenever but Androids needs it to run that laggy OS.. unless you are the 13% that have JB
27. Twisted247 (Posts: 197; Member since: 12 Oct 2012)
Rumors huh? How about doing a simple Google search or YouTube search..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v
The above are just two of many.. and we will "enjoy our quadcores" and maybe in a year or two apple might come out with one (I mean there are plenty available right now that they can rip off then turn around release it and call it innovating.. lmao) Then maybe your hater and ignorant comments that stem from jealously and envy will subside. Probably not though cause Android is dominating the race and they aren't looking back, just cruising forward.
37. gallitoking (Posts: 4684; Member since: 17 May 2011)
why jealousy.. I can buy Android if I wanted to so trust me there is no jealousy.. dont get sensitive on my comment is not like you own Android do you? I thought so...this is a public forum.. not everyone will agree with you.. get over it
13. MC1123 (Posts: 1236; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
this sounds nice! very futuristic! but dont know if android is ready for this huge change....
well unlike windows phone, which is said to be able to run more than quad core coz it is base in windows NT...but still wondering why no manufacturers pick up s4 pro....
oh well would love to see this to happen!
and this is the very reason why we shouldn't hate other company (coz actually i hate samsung) coz without more and more competition, innovation is clogged!
18. Captain_Doug (Posts: 748; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)
I'm not saying this is too much but it does seem like quite a jump. I'd think a quad core A15 with a dual A7 makes more sense as a next step. Not complaining though.
21. darkskoliro (Posts: 953; Member since: 07 May 2012)
Give me a super efficient dual core please :(
Its all ill ever need on a phone. Seriously.
22. Ravail (Posts: 181; Member since: 14 Oct 2011)
While i myself am a computer enthusiast, i want to see better quad core chips.. meaning more work under heavy load with little to no heat at peak performance.
26. nicholassss (Posts: 348; Member since: 10 May 2012)
My note 2 should hold me over until 8 cores show up :3 ( i hope)
30. PapaSmurf (Posts: 7687; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Your Note II will hold you up for a looooooong time. 1.6GHz quad Exynos isn't something to laugh at.
40. zhypher_23 (Posts: 195; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)
Now this is what I call innovation, More Power 2U Samsung
41. zvioocge (Posts: 26; Member since: 23 Oct 2012)
android even not optimized for 4core
quad core krait isn't delivering 2X performance VS dual core krait so...
WE NEED BETTER CORE OPTIMIZATION IN 5.0 KEY LIME PIE!!!
43. flamencoguy (Posts: 89; Member since: 04 Aug 2012)
Quick patent it before Apple does. You know they will patent everything.