x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Samsung Galaxy S5 vs HTC One (M8): preliminary comparison

0. phoneArena 25 Mar 2014, 11:12 posted on

If we had to make a list of the most highly anticipated smartphones right now, then the Samsung Galaxy S5 would probably stand right at the very top of it. The handset is expected to sell by the boatloads once it is released in April, landing in the pockets of both loyal Samsung followers and anyone looking for a capable high-end Android device. But the competition is definitely not going to just stand and watch. Samsung's latest and greatest Android phone will have to face a number of tough opponents on its way to commercial success, and one of the toughest among them will be the HTC One (M8)...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 17 Mar 2014, 14:12 3

198. neartx (banned) (Posts: 86; Member since: 15 Mar 2014)


last year amoled fail and super lcd3 won

posted on 17 Mar 2014, 14:14 2

199. neartx (banned) (Posts: 86; Member since: 15 Mar 2014)


yes the super lcd3 is the best now

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 13:07

123. engineer-1701d (unregistered)


louder speakers take space and the amps and cooling for them remember its aluminium heat sync not so well also what if just what if the htc does have finger print scanner. then what plus you can root and customize the buttons they said they will allow rooted phones to be covered under the advantage program.

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 09:55

62. eq5555 (Posts: 64; Member since: 03 Dec 2013)


haters gona hate
See my 58 comment

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 14:23

164. mojtaba_mn (Posts: 268; Member since: 22 Feb 2013)


Yes HTC are so far better but Samsung fanboys can't see the real
HTC one are my next phone it is so hot

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 14:34 2

169. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


You do know that's an opinion, right?

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 18:51 1

186. Astoni (Posts: 649; Member since: 28 Sep 2013)


Whoa whoa easy there bud..

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 14:24

165. BLUEBLASTER (Posts: 347; Member since: 23 Feb 2014)


I agree with you 100% but what are the chances of us getting a premium S5?

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 15:07 1

170. neartx (banned) (Posts: 86; Member since: 15 Mar 2014)


yes in this battle htc one won by so far

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 18:25

183. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)


Z2 doesn't want to compete here in the U.S. which is sad. GSV will still top sales against the M8

posted on 23 Mar 2014, 15:34

204. anthonio360 (Posts: 7; Member since: 30 May 2011)


Bless ya, U r definitely on point

posted on 25 Mar 2014, 11:41

206. LikeMyself (Posts: 440; Member since: 23 Sep 2013)


What will sell more? S5 no way! S4 will sell better than S5 and new One will take the crown this time with that quite 'reasonable' price tag!
Battery and price are 'reasonable'. Definitely I bet all my million dollars on this One! I'll bet my other millions on your Nokia Android pic if come true!

posted on 25 Mar 2014, 12:19

210. alan_1230 (Posts: 84; Member since: 22 Apr 2012)


no chances for s5 ... 16mp vs 4 ultra pixel you make me throw up in my mouth a little bit lmAO.. try enlarging your pictures from your m8 if you get it

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 09:03 13

3. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)


Of course the Galaxy S5!
What HTC has done this year is simply apathetic...

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 09:11 18

15. ArtSim98 (Posts: 3535; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)


LOL ok...

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 09:28 3

40. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)


This was a bit laconic, came here to say only this?

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 09:31 9

44. ArtSim98 (Posts: 3535; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)


Yep. That literally was my response.

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 09:48 2

57. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)


Hmm, I hoped that I will find somebody to discuss about this certain topic, but seems the time hasn't come.

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 13:11 2

127. engineer-1701d (unregistered)


your english sucks but what art is saying is gs5 is not a worth while step up from the gs4 other then the finger print scanner, its like when the android world made fun of apple fans for getting the 5 then 5s just for the finger print part, htc is a bigger upgrade then the gs5 this year

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 13:36

145. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)


lol why does my english suck? :D I really can't see any differences between mine and your english, only that mine is much better.

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 09:12 1

16. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


For the general public they don't and won't complain, for us techies and geeks no phone will satisfy our needs, unless we custom make our phones with best materials, best battery, best CPU, GPU, glass, and features should be ultra speced, not high end,,,,?

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 09:16 1

23. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)


Why would the general public prefer a huge 5 incher over a more compact 5 incher? Actually they are still portable items...

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 09:21

30. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


I believe a 4.5 to 5.0 is great and have an option to buy the both with same features like SonyZ mini

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 10:55

87. Slammer (Posts: 1515; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


How do you propose to modify if the manufacturers are sealing up their phones like Fort Knox? Really. You can't have it both ways. If you want a metal phone, and have the ability to be that Tech geek you want to be, stress to them you want to ability to do so by allowing certain accessibility. Otherwise, your tech limits are no more than the average consumer. Let's get that straight right now.

John B.

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 13:14 1

129. engineer-1701d (unregistered)


john what modifying are you talking about if you are really that good at modding you can take the htc back cut it mig weld it and do what ever with it, but you keep saying mod we dont switch parts inside phones anymore they are not compatible with other parts. i used to do that back 7 years ago

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 15:17

173. Slammer (Posts: 1515; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


Modifying can be as simple as replacing the battery or augmenting memory at will. Small example yet useful.

I don't trust cloud as of yet and I don't feel paying monthly for storage is very cool. I still have sd cards I swap out depending on jobs I'm performing.

As far as batteries, I'm even less forgiving. The rechargeable battery hasn't changed in almost 30 years. The inner elements and components may have been improved to accomodate longer use, but essentially, it is no more advanced in structure of how it charges and discharges. Why are taking 30 year old technology and imbedding it in modern day smartphones. Manufacturers have rallied to approach acceptable user length times yet, fall extremely short of eliminating failures of the most important part of most any electronic device.

In the early sixties, we had the technology to build a carburetor to extract almost 120mpg on full sized vehicles. Where is that technology today? They are making vehicles more attractive and fuel efficient yet, I can't seem to find a vehicle today that gets more gas mileage than a toyota celica I owned back in the early
80's.

My point is that the wireless industry wants to capitalize on the money that can be made by consumers being forced to bring their handsets in for a simple battery issue. Since, owning cellphones for 28 years, I have always carried a spare battery just as I do with my Galaxy.
Sometimes old school has its draw back. But, most often experience plays out in confidence for peace of mind. I just don't have the time in my busy schedule to visit a phone service center on a regular basis for small, annoyances such as battery snafus.

In all honesty, what really is the motive for sealing in the most failed electronic component in world? Current designs of imbedded battery phones haven't met the hyperbole that manufacturers claim. The claim of slimmer and lighter phones.

My bone of contention is that tech geeks should be demanding more control in order to improve phone designs with less concessions rather than applauding designs that remove the consumer accessibility and control. Afterall, we are all consumers outside of the wireless industry. I would be pretty pissed if I had to throw out my TV remote out due to failed or degraded battery.

Since smartphones are controlling housewares, cars, and other applications, the strain on batteries becomes excessive. We should be able to change them out without visiting service centers. Many think aesthetic designs is a step forward. With current battery technology, I think it is a step backward if I can't change something with high fail rate such as a battery.

To wrap up my rant, I'm not sure why people that claim to be tech geeks or enthusiasts seem to overlook this logic. When I instruct other technicians in my industry of work, I always have a battery to pass around. I tell them to acclimate themselves to it. It will be roughly 40% of their repairs.

John B.

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 18:33 2

184. papss (unregistered)


John that was a long read, should have had page numbers even :-) .. Anyways I just want to say that I too have been using cell phones for more than 15 years and I've not had a single failed battery in at least 10 of those years. While its possibly due to my lack of keeping a phone for any amount of time but my point is that your decision to not venture away from SS is a narrow way to be considering your labeling of yourself as a tech geek

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 19:10

188. Slammer (Posts: 1515; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


Whether or not I'm a tech geek, doesn't change the odds of battery failure. I've never been injured or killed in an auto accident. I've never been shot with a gun. Yet, many auto accidents or gun violence has led to serious health or death occurrences. So, you have used cellphones for 15 years without battery incident. I can claim that I have experienced four phones out of probably 12 in the 28 years I've owned them. It is all in perspective of chance.

Technically, scientists and engineers suggest you check a battery every 6 months for swelling and to relieve the phone of full current being generated through the circuitry. This not only helps prevent heat build up due to weakend anodes and cathodes in the battery, but it also helps recondition the inner circuitry of the phone. Granted, phones today do not the reconditioning as of a few years ago, but batteries swelling inside a phone, is a common problem that cannot be seen in a sealed state. It is often too late to catch the problem at that point. Overheating, flashing screens, noisy voice calls, constant booting and rebooting can all be signs of failing or shorting batteries. In some instances, hooking a charger to the phone to compensate for any "shorted" battery can damage the charger as well as have no effect in trying to get the phone to turn on.

Please ascend to my post as rational info and knowledge rather trying to make excuses for industry foul play.

John B.

posted on 29 Mar 2014, 16:50

234. badtoy1986 (Posts: 2; Member since: 29 Mar 2014)


Your argument about carrying an extra battery for your phone with a swappable battery for emergencies is moot.

You could just as easily keep a portable battery pack that can be used on many more devices than just your phone.

posted on 16 Mar 2014, 09:23 8

32. Galen20K (Posts: 541; Member since: 26 Dec 2008)


typical Samesung fan response towards htc.. lol

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories