Samsung Galaxy S III vs Apple iPhone 4S drop test is for real (video)
0. phoneArena 04 Jun 2012, 02:29 posted on
In a non-scientific (these are the best) drop test, the Samsung Galaxy S III and the Apple iPhone 4S, both in white, were pitted against each other, but with one common enemy - the ground, covered in concrete pavement...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. OuterHeaven1987 (Posts: 5; Member since: 10 May 2012)
You know what...we in the "first world" sure do have some silly habits as in destroying almost 1500 dollars of value for what exactly?
12. CharlieAtInfinity (Posts: 253; Member since: 10 Apr 2012)
they got s**t loads of money and time!!!
28. SherlockHolmes (Posts: 125; Member since: 10 Apr 2012)
The Samsung Galaxy S3 is destroyed because it is inspired by nature and you know what Concrete is not included in Nature !!
82. corporateJP (Posts: 2431; Member since: 28 Nov 2009)
Where I work, people know that Samsung makes trash.
This phone is overhyped.
90. anjaleenarobert (Posts: 2; Member since: 04 Oct 2012)
it all depends on the angle that its dropped on. the more vibration that goes through the phone, the more likely it is to smash the screen.
Check Samsung Galaxy S III current value according to this survey report http://www.movaluate.com/samsu
2. Forsaken77 (Posts: 553; Member since: 09 Jun 2011)
So much for that Gorilla Glass 2 protection. I watched Corning's demo video of GG2 and they do worse things to it than this drop test and it was fine. But dropping it from 4 ft kills the screen? Someone should make sure Corning sees this.
64. JunitoNH (Posts: 1858; Member since: 15 Feb 2012)
First, sorry about your phone. So much for the iPhone being so fragile.
36. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
well, it took a phone nearly double the size of the iphone to become just as fragile. lol
ok kids, do not throw your phones around. k? lol
45. ngo2dd (Posts: 896; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)
wow you worst tjen the apple people. The one x and the iphone did better then the SGS3 In the drop test. The SGS3 crack on the side test, so it is more fragile
48. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
where did i say it wasnt fragile? before you go trollin me, make sure you read the comment. I just said it was as fragile as the iphone. the iphone breaks when you "hold it wrong" or sneeze on it.
50. ngo2dd (Posts: 896; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)
You are defending it by saying the size made a different so down playing. you keeptrolling. You also keep saying how plastics make the phone less fragile, and the metal make the phone more fragile, but here is a contradiction.
52. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
no you troll.
the SGS1 and SGS2 both pounce through the bounce test. the SGS3 does not. Heck, the Note bounced through it as well.
The ONLY difference besides screen sizes is the fact that the SGS3 uses gorilla glass 2, while the other 3 use GG1. Im actually saying that i dont thing GG2 might not be as strong as they thought it was. GG2 uses a thinner screen than GG1 because its supposed to be "stronger". However, these tests are showing that the thinner GG2 screen + large screen = cracks all over the place.
there is no contradiction. only idiot trolls that try to pick apart my every statement obsessively looking for contradictions even think that.
59. SleepingOz (unregistered)
Right. I'd prefer Gorilla Glass 1 on the GSIII, although it's a lil thicker.
73. ngo2dd (Posts: 896; Member since: 08 Jul 2011)
Then why both the one x and one S survive side test?
76. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
proving once again that you and taco both ate paint chips together.
78. E.N. (Posts: 2610; Member since: 25 Jan 2009)
stop being a troll remixfa. The galaxy sIII is fragile, and that should be the end. We don't know 100% exactly what makes it more fragile, all we know is that it is. So stop always trying to give Android/Samsung the leg up in everything.
I'm sure you're still going to buy the phone regardless, which is totally fine. But it would have been nice if you and other Android users had done the same and not be a troll when people were buying their oober fragile iPhones.
83. corporateJP (Posts: 2431; Member since: 28 Nov 2009)
Remix, my brother, I hate to admit it, but these cats got you cornered on this one...
88. u-suck-more (Posts: 529; Member since: 26 Aug 2011)
judging by the video, the iPhone is stronger than e GS3. i mean, look at it. cracks all over and still works fine. GS3? less cracked but dead
84. corporateJP (Posts: 2431; Member since: 28 Nov 2009)
"so watch a redhead smash"
^That part of the sentence had me thinking dirty thoughts.
3. hung2900 (Posts: 956; Member since: 02 Mar 2012)
That's why we need a case, and it's enough. Then who cares about the ugly back?
In fact HTC needs a back cover than GS3. Without it, the glass screen of the camera will be scratched soon.
5. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)
Weird that the drop from the back didn't wipe the iPhone out as well.
Gravity and pavement do not play nice with phones, lol.
6. bbblader (Posts: 590; Member since: 24 Oct 2011)
good job apple now your iPhone isn't the worst in durability
7. mrochester (unregistered)
This just goes to show that it's *how* a device is dropped that effects whether you'll break it or not, not that it's simply dropped. I've dropped my 4S loads of times and the glass remains completely intact and shatter free (I do however have a little ding on the border around the glass from one fall).
16. rhen84 (Posts: 2; Member since: 19 Apr 2012)
All GG test is performed with force perpendicular to the GG surface.
GG doesn't as strange against parallel force as perpendicular.
The SGS3's glass is an edge to edge glass so it can be broken with a side drop.
Lumia phones' screen is more protected against this force since it has a border around the screen.
79. E.N. (Posts: 2610; Member since: 25 Jan 2009)
The samsung galaxy siii's screen is not an edge to edge screened phone. Take a look at some pictures.
Stop making excuses guys. The SGIII is fragile, plain and simple.
8. baldilocks (Posts: 749; Member since: 14 Dec 2008)
That's why we need flexible and/or polycarbonate displays.
9. 09wbd03516 (banned) (Posts: 140; Member since: 30 May 2012)
this gorilla glas arguement is stupid
Whether its breakable is depend on how thickness it pack
The reason that lumia 900 survive is because it pack the thickest glas (11mm thick phone prove that) whereas iphone pack the least thick (9mm thick phone prove that)