Samsung Galaxy S III just $49.99 at Best Buy for Sunday only
Verizon had started rolling out the Android 4.1 update for the Samsung Galaxy S III, it means that all four major stateside carriers have updated the model to Jelly Bean. In the stores, the phone will be available in pebble blue or marble white while more color options are available online.
If you have an upgrade burning a hole in your pocket, you could use it to pick up the Samsung Galaxy S III tomorrow for $49.99 from Best Buy, or you can wait to see what other deals will be available in the next week or so. We must say, it's hard to imagine seeing this model being priced right now for less than tomorrow's sale price from the electronics retailer.
source: BestBuy via AndroidAuthority
Best Buy will be bringing back a popular Black Friday offer to consumers for one day – this Sunday, Dec. 16 – when Best Buy and Best Buy Mobile stores nationwide reduce the price of the Samsung Galaxy S III 16GB model to $49.99.
For this one day, customers will be able to save $150 with a two-year activation on Sprint, Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile and stay connected with what is arguably one of the hottest Android™ smartphones on the market.
The Samsung Galaxy S III features Android 4.0 (Ice Cream Sandwich), a 4.8″ HD Super AMOLED™ touchscreen display, Qualcomm Snapdragon™ S4 1.5 GHz dual core CPU and 2GB of internal RAM. Customers can choose between two popular colors – Pebble Blue and Marble White (additional colors available online).
Best Buy offers consumers the ability to compare and choose between any carrier, any phone and any plan with lots of unbiased advice at all Best Buy and Best Buy Mobile stores. In addition, Best Buy offers an array of services aimed at improving customers’ experience, including Walk Out Working, Upgrade Checker, Happy 24, and a full assortment of accessories for customers to protect and personalize their new mobile devices.
38. ardent1 posted on 16 Dec 2012, 00:31 1 0
$399 currently at Metro PCS.
If Metro can sell the device for this price -- so should the big boys. Buying a discounted phone to save a few hundreds and locking oneself to a huge monthly bill over 2-years with hefty ETF is just plain dumb.
My advice: Buy the phone outright and then shop for no-contract service and save $$$ over the same 2 years.
47. minteke posted on 16 Dec 2012, 12:07 0 0
Ok, let's do a math.
I pay for 550 min family plan from AT@T $112 AFTER tax and employer's 23% discount for 3 SG2, which I got from Amazon's last year Thanksgiving sale for free. Just compare with case when you need to buy those 3 phones for full price AND still to pay for the service.
That's why I mentioned Amazon here - no such generous offer this year.
Probably what you said makes sense if you care about individual plan.
2. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 15 Dec 2012, 21:03 3 3
Good job SS
8. networkdood posted on 15 Dec 2012, 21:53 2 1
Good job SS for the phone and good job BB for the price.
13. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 15 Dec 2012, 22:00 5 2
Stop playing the juge and give some value to the discussion will u?
17. darkkjedii posted on 15 Dec 2012, 22:18 2 4
Stop kissing SS's butt and give some value to tech.
19. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 15 Dec 2012, 22:31 2 4
Haha, I know kissing Apple ass is you favorite passtime and don't think all people have the same taste as yourself.
I don't remember you talking about tech, all you can talk is fanboy warfare.
do you know what quad core is? LOL
20. darkkjedii posted on 15 Dec 2012, 22:49 2 3
My favorite passtime is watching my sons baseball games, and as far as kissing, only my fiancé. And yes I know what quad core is... Please find, copy, and paste any article that shows me to b a fanboy, and I'll do the same for u. I'm sure your article will out number mine whatever to zero.
22. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:01 2 4
angry aren't you? lol
23. darkkjedii posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:20 1 3
Not angry at all I jus want u to find, copy, and paste any article that shows me to b a fanboy. In other words put your money where your mouth is please. And tell your fellow droider bro, and dude r universal words for addressing men u don't know personally. And wireless charging that uses a cord isn't wireless.
25. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:27 2 3
What do u think wireless is? total lack of wire?
Do you think then there is anything wireless? Damn Verizon, it's not wireless according to your definition.
Man, you are going to turn tech on its head.
27. darkkjedii posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:38 2 3
Find, copy, and paste any article that shows me to b a fanboy please. Put your money where your mouth is. Please.
28. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:40 1 3
C'on, this wireless discussion is getting more exciting
31. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:46 1 3
Now you can change your name into "wireless darkkjedii", Oh wait even you may not be wireless Hahaha
21. PhoneArenaUser posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:00 3 3
Actually I remember when he was talking about technologies, he was claiming that Nokia Lumia 920 wireless charging is actually not wireless...
Also don't forget that he often use very "intellectual" words such like "bro", "dude" and I think it very well represents him...
24. darkkjedii posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:23 0 3
U put the phone on the base and its charging, unplug the base and it stops. That's wired not wireless.
26. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:34 2 2
Genius ROFLMAO hahahahaha
29. quakan posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:42 1 0
So according to you, the only real wireless charging is if there was a way to have electrical currents radiate from...idk since no wires can even be involved (do power lines count too?), but I guess radiate from thin air and keep your phone charged at all times while keeping you safe from any hazard? It sounds like you almost want a system where we get rid of power lines and the power grids would just radiate electrical current throughout every city.
P.S. - I copied and pasted that into Dictionary.com and ridiculous came up...weird, huh?
32. darkkjedii posted on 15 Dec 2012, 23:52 0 2
This is what wireless charging is. The base is plugged in to only charge the batteries when they r low. Once charged up the base no longer requires the cord nor does it require the phone to b on the base. It emits a small magnetic field to charge the device. The base can b on the table and the phone on your lap on the couch and as long as its within a certain proximity to the base it charges. This is what apple patented as true wireless charging. Again the base only requires the plug to charge the batteries from time to time, not to supply the charge to the phone thru the base. The phone doesn't need to b on the base just n the required proximity. Wireless charging as it stands requires the base to constantly b plugged into the wall and requires the phone to b n constant contact with the base. That's not wireless that's wired.
36. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 16 Dec 2012, 00:10 2 1
Here's the definition (from Wikipedia)
Inductive charging (also known as "wireless charging") uses an electromagnetic field to transfer energy between two objects. This is usually done with a charging station. Energy is sent through an inductive coupling to an electrical device, which can then use that energy to charge batteries or run the device.
37. quakan posted on 16 Dec 2012, 00:26 1 1
That's still not "fully" wireless because in that scenario the base acts as a middle man. The base still must be plugged up and charged in order to pass that along to your phone wirelessly. Just because the base has a rechargeable battery doesn't make it any less wired than what you're trying to convince me that it is.
I do want to point out that I only challenged you on this because you don't see how sitting your phone on a base isn't wireless charging, but having your phone near the base is. While laying your phone on a base is restrictive as to where you can charge it, it's still wireless because you could come home from a long day and place you're phone right on that base and rest assured that it will charge.
The system that Apple has patented requires 1 rechargeable battery in your device, 1 rechargeable battery in your base, and............a wired charger for that base. While the concept may seem cool, it definitely will cause a user to have to replace more batteries that way. Eventually that battery in your base will become less effective and will die, ending your proximity based charging until you can get a new rechargeable battery that will have to be charged up with a wire to an outlet. So unless you have a spare battery lying around you'll wind up pulling out your phone charger. Don't forget a system like that from Apple will be marked up to a premium price.
39. MeoCao (unregistered) posted on 16 Dec 2012, 00:51 3 1
There's no need to argue with him on this b-c what he claims is dumb.
A technical term does not mean something literally, it's has the meaning as agreed by the community and not some or a single person,
especially when it's Mr. "wireless darkkjedii"
40. darkkjedii posted on 16 Dec 2012, 01:03 1 4
Quakan I appreciate the conversation with u as it shows your intelligence and maturity. U as am I r a techie, doesn't matter what camp ur from. We can agree, or agree to disagree with knowledge, maturity, and respect. While I don't agree totally with ur assessment I whole heartedly respect it. Good post bro
45. quakan posted on 16 Dec 2012, 09:37 1 0
48. Droid_X_Doug posted on 16 Dec 2012, 13:53 1 0
Ummm. The generally accepted definition for wireless charging relates only to the final connection between charging device and the phone. Using your pedantic definition would preclude any wireless charging, since electricity is transported from the generating source by wires (even the solar chargers use wires to transport the electron from the solar panel.
51. EclipseGSX posted on 16 Dec 2012, 20:26 1 0
LOL What about WiFi then? Connect to your router and you're wireless, unplug the router and you're not. Does that mean WiFi isn't true wireless?
53. cripton805 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 13:00 0 0
I was hoping someone with some sense would step in. Wireless is wireless when the product doesn't have a wire.
Wireless charging is not supposed to replace at home charging. It's meant to replace the hassle OF PLUGGING YOUR PHONE TO A CORD. So yes, it's 100% wireless charging. Without a doubt. You set it down without plugging it in and the next time you pick it up its charged. All while you never plugged in a charger to you phone. This isnt rocket science.
How dumb you would look if you actually took that argument somewhere.
5. Jeradiah3 posted on 15 Dec 2012, 21:25 2 0
they need to do this for the Note!! I'll upgrade if they have a sale for the Note
49. Droid_X_Doug posted on 16 Dec 2012, 13:56 1 0
Wait until just before the Note III is released, and you might get a similar promotional offer. GS IV is just around the corner and Sammy would like to clear as much of the pipeline as possible. Holidays is a convenient excuse.
50. Jeradiah3 posted on 16 Dec 2012, 14:16 0 0
as fast as technology is concerned, it changes as fast as a baby changes his/her diapers! Im just tired of the phone I have and ready to upgrade to another one. I want the Note II and the price will drop once the SIV and Note III comes out in a few months.
the only way i'll change phones is if my phones just doesnt work anymore
6. networkdood posted on 15 Dec 2012, 21:52 1 0
Samsung has improved their updates and this is a great deal for an awesome phone.
7. rawmustard posted on 15 Dec 2012, 21:52 2 0
And since it's still within the return window of my purchase, I'll be calling to get $53 back. And I thought it was a good deal at $99.99.
10. freebee269 posted on 15 Dec 2012, 21:57 1 0
just wondering since you're a new user of gs3, how do you feel about the build quality? i have heard alot of mixed thoughts about it from online and from ppl in person. i'm thinking of getting my son one as an add a line on my account, he is 16 and i dont want to get a phone thats plastic and easy to break as you know how teenagers are. so i would appreciate your honest answer or anyone elses, that doesnt include fanboy'ism.
14. cripton805 posted on 15 Dec 2012, 22:05 0 0
Build is fine. People just dont like the smooth feel. If he were to break this phone, he would probably break another. If youre that worried, buy a Nokia Lumia.
At 16 he should have protection anyway. High School is a hive for thieves and broken phones.
16. freebee269 posted on 15 Dec 2012, 22:12 0 0
thank you for your reply. i have a lumia 920, but he likes android more so thats why i'm inquiring about this phone's build quality.
46. darac posted on 16 Dec 2012, 10:36 0 0
Honestly, being an owner of one and having a dozen of phones before it, I think it's and excellent quality product.
It MAY be a bit fragile, but a good protective case should turn it into a VERY durable, reliable gadget.
..also, don't believe the guy who talks about the screen being prone to scratches.
I don't use a screen protector simply because in a three month of heavy use I'm yet to notice a single, tiniest scratch on it.
52. freebee269 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 10:11 0 0
thank you all that responded. i did get my son one yesterday with a case and the case does make it feel more solid. the phone surprisingly was a little heavier than i thought. but not as heavy as my lumia 920. he is enjoying it. the primary reason he wanted the gs3 is because he has other friends with the gs3 and they all like to s-beam each other things so he wanted to be in the crowd also.
18. rawmustard posted on 15 Dec 2012, 22:20 0 0
The build quality is solid. There seems to be plenty of latch points for the battery cover, as it goes on very tight. If he's prone to dropping it, a protective case would be a good investment. The glass front looks amazing, but you certainly wouldn't want it to hit a hard or jagged surface.
41. christianqwerty posted on 16 Dec 2012, 01:10 0 1
Coming from an iphone, the build quality I think is below par. The back is very scratched and it squeaks because a latch fell off the battery cover. The screen is also prone to scratches more than usual I found.
43. cripton805 posted on 16 Dec 2012, 05:48 1 0
Scratches > Broken
I doubt you had the iPhone 5, so I will assume it was the 4 version. It was glass. That is the worst material to call sturdy.
Also, NO Apple product has comparable protection coverage insurance compared to the rest.
So, if its ever stolen, be prepared to fork some cash.
15. rawmustard posted on 15 Dec 2012, 22:09 0 0
Or maybe not, since they're running a special test promotion on the low price guarantee, and that specifically says they will not price match during the return/exchange period. Still happy with the purchase, of course.
44. QuikZilvr posted on 16 Dec 2012, 06:13 0 0
I wish I could get in on this deal without losing my unlimited data plan.