x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Samsung Galaxy S III Mini fulls specs, price and release date leak out

0. phoneArena 10 Oct 2012, 06:46 posted on

The Samsung Galaxy S III Mini might have just been officially confirmed, but it’s not officially announced yet and we have no details…

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 07:17

13. jeroome86 (Posts: 1372; Member since: 12 Apr 2012)


Should of gave it better specs. Still prefer the S3 over this

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 07:21

16. ARITRA (Posts: 45; Member since: 07 Dec 2011)


i was hoping for a tegra 3 device

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 07:23

17. rickywinataa (Posts: 262; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)


$550 ?!?! i like samsung but this is ridiculous, i will get htc one s rather than this any day

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 07:25

19. kartik4u98 (Posts: 511; Member since: 19 May 2012)


PA, Is STE U8420 a typo??
Because no such cpu exists on the wiki page of NovaThor..

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 07:28

20. brock8687 (Posts: 10; Member since: 03 Oct 2012)


Big Big Disappointment especially for its price!!!! Lower mid range device exorbitantly priced.... would go to and S2 or an xperia s/sl over this any day!!! A "mini" device with "mini" specs with a "mini" price range would have done the trick I guess...... but not to be I guess!!!

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 07:28

21. Ragnarockd (Posts: 47; Member since: 27 Aug 2012)


So it seems like s3's Big brother and Little brother are gonna storm the market.

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 07:41

23. ILikeBubbles (Posts: 525; Member since: 17 Jan 2011)


Why do the specs on the 'mini' have to be nerfed? Is there no such thing as a high end smartphone anymore that isn't the size of my forearm?

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 08:01

26. smallworld (Posts: 488; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)


Housing : Plastic
Funny ha.

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 08:14

27. zeljonsu (Posts: 22; Member since: 24 May 2012)


I guess this is the true successor to the Galaxy W GT-I8150 (rumored as Galaxy SII Mini before) and not the Ace 2 GT-I8160..... :)

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 08:24

30. Rexperia (Posts: 134; Member since: 28 Sep 2012)


500 USD...what..?? i'll go with xperia SL, way better than this and almost equal price..

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 08:49

34. proto (Posts: 59; Member since: 12 Sep 2012)


This is bulls**t.. it looks like galaxy s advance specs not s3 mini o.O

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 09:17

35. PhansMuneeb (Posts: 371; Member since: 28 Jan 2012)


I thought it will be $300-380.
Really disappointed if this is the price.
Well still i will read official price because these are rumors.

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 09:31

36. Vikranth (Posts: 6; Member since: 27 Sep 2012)


s**t...S2 is better....S3 mini buyers are losers...

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 09:36

37. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5711; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


Samsung needs to learn from Moto on how to make a mid-range handset.

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 09:50

38. sudbury78 (Posts: 136; Member since: 12 Jul 2012)


Hahahaha hahahaha

Samsung: epic fail.

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 10:56

40. sjtempo9x (Posts: 7; Member since: 21 Jul 2012)


why not 8mpx camera SamSung? why?
design, screen res, ram, is ok with me but just 5mpx?
now i must wait to the G Nexus 2 or may be LG Nexus :(

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 13:35

42. medomoo (Posts: 3; Member since: 28 Oct 2011)


This will be almost same "Galaxy S Duos S7562" !!!!!!!!!

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 13:50

43. saiki4116 (Posts: 388; Member since: 31 Mar 2011)


the specs are ditto like galaxy s advance,which costs near 400$ in India.I dont think so,they will price that higher...

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 14:29

44. jamiedroid (Posts: 2; Member since: 10 Oct 2012)


this is retarded, this is no competitor to the iPhone 5! it should have had the same specs, except for the smaller screen

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 18:12

47. shadez10 (Posts: 427; Member since: 15 Jan 2012)


my SGS2 is still better... =D

posted on 10 Oct 2012, 18:57

48. pikapowerize (banned) (Posts: 1869; Member since: 03 May 2012)


looks really ugly!! and the heck with the price? its too much for a mid-range! and ST ericson chips? LOL

posted on 11 Oct 2012, 02:15

51. J1919 (Posts: 32; Member since: 28 Aug 2012)


This phone seems feels so pointless. It's lower spec'd than the S2 (which is getting JB) and cost more than it... does not compute. Screen size is the only thing in it's favor I guess.

posted on 12 Oct 2012, 08:49

53. jchuamanl (Posts: 8; Member since: 10 Oct 2012)


I think the problem with this phone is the name because this phone has more in common with the Galaxy Mini than the SIII: a slower processor, a camera with less megapixels, less screen resolution, no LTE, etc. So it's more an enhanced Mini than a smaller SIII. But I don't think this is a bad phone for an entry level. I have a Galaxy Mini just for calling and sending SMS and emails, but for reading, browsing the web and playing some games I have a 7 inch tablet and that combination works for me.

The thing that I don't like besides the low resolution is the price, if the price in Europe for the unlocked version is over $500, I don't want to imagine how much would it cost in South America.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories