Samsung Galaxy S II graphics processor found to be fastest among current smartphones
0. phoneArena posted on 19 Sep 2011, 05:27
The Samsung Exynos ARM Mali-400 GPU performance was found to be better than the rest of the graphics chips in current high-end smartphones, but worse than the PowerVR SGX543MP2 in the Apple A5 dual-core silicon, as found in the iPad 2, just as expected...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. PeterIfromsweden posted on 19 Sep 2011, 05:29 5 0
It wasn't really a surprise that Samsungs Exynos has the best graphics...
12. Rimm-Jobs (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 08:09 3 1
Fastest graphics, slowest updates. That's always been Samsung's modus operandi - great hardware, piss-poor software/firmware.
14. ToneDef posted on 19 Sep 2011, 08:23 0 0
I have read this comment before but no-one has ever provided a table comparison to say what they're comparing it to, and the actual dates when those comparators were updated. Perosnally, I don't mind about how often I get updates - I just want software that is stable and works.
15. Rimm-Jobs (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 08:33 0 1
Have you tried TouchWIZ? Can you really say that prior to 1.2GHz dual core CPUs, it works? It's laggy as all hell.
Anyway, since you asked, here's a link to an article with facts about updating to newer versions of Android amongst the major manufacturers. It's from January of this year - it's the most recent I could find. (Also, remember, it's not taking into account phones Samsung promised updates to Froyo, then went back on their word)
16. Rimm-Jobs (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 08:38 0 1
Sorry, must have accidentally hit submit. Anywho, the charts show that at that time, HTC had updated 50% of it's smartphones to Froyo in an average time of 56 days. Moto had updated 15.4% of it's phones in 54.5 days. Samsung, 11.1% in an average of 159 days.
17. p0rkguy posted on 19 Sep 2011, 08:51 0 0
Blame the carriers not the manufacturer.
21. Leftheodo (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 11:57 0 0
HTC's phones are branded too you know! Anyway Samsung is a great manufacturer and i hope they do smth about their updates
27. RIMM-Jobs (unregistered) posted on 20 Sep 2011, 18:25 0 0
It's not the carriers, or all phones would be slow on the updates. There's a huge difference between frequency of updates from Samsung and HTC. Verizon carries many of each manufacturer. The HTC phones are updated three times as often, three times as quickly.
24. sgogeta4 posted on 19 Sep 2011, 17:13 1 0
Samsung openly acknowledges their weaknesses and they know their limitations in the smartphone world. They are actively improving their software and firmware division by hiring many of the best programmers, such as the CyanogenMod team and will definitely have great future products. As stated, it's not how often updates are given but the stability, and I believe the next TouchWiz will be amazing with their current programming team.
2. CX3NT3_713 posted on 19 Sep 2011, 05:42 5 0
DEAR PHONEAREANA, get rid of thoes annoying pop up ad's
10. Junglejoe (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 07:55 0 0
you got adblock on your mobile device?
22. Leftheodo (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 11:58 0 0
I do, on opera mobile!
3. som posted on 19 Sep 2011, 05:57 4 5
Rotten Apple have to go down to hell with other chips.
5. rasnicki (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 06:45 0 0
This has to be some kind of a joke, right?!
Why is there no mention that the Mali-400 GPU doesn't support texture compression formats such as PVR, ATITC, DXT...
As a result, many games aren't supported on GS2 so you have to root the phone, install Chainfire 3D and tinker with the settings to make it work.
Just one of the many issues with this phone and one of the reasons I already sold my GS2.
11. taz89 posted on 19 Sep 2011, 08:01 0 0
What are you on about....so far every game I have tried works perfectly...the only games that don't work are the tegra versions and we all know why...but if yo want to okay them then you need chainfire
6. remixfa posted on 19 Sep 2011, 06:47 2 0
ha, i guess a few of us constantly linking to this Anandtech article got PA's attention. :)
8. bada_slave (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 07:13 1 1
Hey Peter, what are you doing here man!!!!
The BADA PARTY has been delayed since you went underground. Come on man, the BADA COCKTAIL is desperately awaiting the touch of your divine lips.
13. PotDragon posted on 19 Sep 2011, 08:22 1 1
Slight differences in processor speed...shrug.
Rather see a phone with 2 gigs or more of RAM.
Of course....no 4g in 2011 makes an instant fail device. Like the X2 and the iphoneANY.
19. anirudhshirsat97 posted on 19 Sep 2011, 10:47 0 0
That's one good slap integrated devices..!
20. KingK (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 10:54 0 0
Not the fastest, bunch of those tests it loses and the ones it wins they are compared to qhd resolutions. Pointless comparison.
Mali is actually weak and slow.
Where's smartbench gaming at??? lol
23. BrockSamson (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 16:52 0 0
Anandtech does not make pointless comparisons. If you think so then you failed to read the entire article or at the very least missed some of the obvious yet important bits of information, like how some of the benchmarks were run at 720p off-screen to prevent the native device resolution from influencing the results.... and the GS2 still smoked them all.
The only area where the Mali-400 GPU sucks is vertex performance (and it does suck at it) and that doesn't matter because mobile games and apps are not demanding when it comes to vertex performance, nor will they be for the moderately foreseeable future. So even though the performance of the chip is skewed fairly heavily to one kind of rendering, it just so happens that this is exactly the kind of rendering done on mobile devices today, which is why the real world performance is so much higher than all the other devices.
26. BK (unregistered) posted on 19 Sep 2011, 18:55 1 0
PhoneArena tried to place IPhone 4 on those charts to compare it with Galaxy S II but failed. Overshadowed by its main competitor and many many other competitors. Not to mentioned the IPhone 3GS.
So they used the IPad 2 instead. Get the logic?
Should they edit the chart to include Galaxy Tab 10.1?