Samsung Galaxy S II HD may be headed to the UK
Share:
The device matches up with the specs that we've heard for the Skyrocket HD variant headed to AT&T, which includes LTE and a 4.65" Super AMOLED display rocking a 720p resolution. Additionally, this version headed to the UK has some specs given that weren't for the Skyrocket HD including an NFC chip, an 8MP camera, Bluetooth 3.0, and an 1850 mAh battery. No word on the processor, but we're hoping it will be the same 1.5 GHz dual-core CPU found in the Skyrocket HD.
Obviously, no word on price or availability, but we expect to hear about it soon considering it's widely expected that the Samsung Galaxy S III will be making an appearance and MWC next month.
source: The Next Web
Share:
Steve Jobs lifelike action figure is canceled after “immense pressure” 
Popular iOS game Whale Trail comes to Android Market 
-
LG Optimus F3 pictured, detailed for Sprint
-
Alleged Samsung Galaxy S4 Active photos show rugged yet slim chassis
-
Make your Samsung Galaxy S4 sound better with Adapt Sound
-
Yahoo's board agrees to $1.1 billion acquisition of Tumblr
-
Parting images and wrap-up from the last day of Google I/O
-
PhoneArena's John Velasco talks about the geek life
14 Comments
1. henrickrw posted on 16 Jan 2012, 19:23 10 4
1.5 GHZ CPU?... Give me a break.. Qualcomm Snapdragon... That´s a waste.
I rather my GS2 1.2 GHZ Exynos all the way...
2. cheetah2k posted on 16 Jan 2012, 19:35 3 1
Agreed.. Even a TI chipset like the Galaxy Nexus would have done...... Gotta love that 4.65" screen though... what a winner :)
4. remixfa posted on 16 Jan 2012, 19:40 2 1
the exynos can clock up to 1.5ghz. thats how its clocked in the Note. The only problem is that i dont think the exynos is LTE capable. Unless they move to the new 4212 exynos.. which has at least a decent chance of happening since it started sampling a few months ago.
5. henrickrw posted on 16 Jan 2012, 19:44 5 3
I´m happy with HSPA up to 21MBPS..... No need for Wimax or LTE
6. remixfa posted on 16 Jan 2012, 19:52 4 3
exactly. real world difference isnt that much more dramatic to justify the loss of exynos and trading it for the crapdragon.
Oh well, I'll just keep holding out for the SGS3. If i didnt use wifi tether so much, i would have broken down and bought an international sgs2 by now. I dont care if its 3g or 4g as they are both plenty fast.., as long as its not EDGE.. lol.
7. DROIDX0430 posted on 16 Jan 2012, 20:24 1 6
U r the taco of android...talk....u really dont know much....remixfa
12. biophone posted on 16 Jan 2012, 23:00 4 0
No you are :). What he said was dead on correct.
8. imkyle posted on 16 Jan 2012, 21:24 0 0
The unlocked Galaxy Note is only HSPA+ 21mps and not LTE correct?
9. henrickrw posted on 16 Jan 2012, 21:35 1 0
Correct.... At least the international version....
10. imkyle posted on 16 Jan 2012, 21:37 0 0
so I'm guessing that the version coming to AT&T is going to be a Qualcomm chip?
11. Mario1017 posted on 16 Jan 2012, 21:39 3 0
You obviously haven't tried the SII with the qualcomm, I dont see why people hate on the MSM, its faster that the Tegra 2, TI, and Exynos, the only thing that people hate is the GPU in it. and its not bad at all, just not the best.
13. thelegend6657 posted on 17 Jan 2012, 00:14 2 2
I like snapdragon more . That's my personal choice when it comes to CPU for android
-
1.
What makes the Full HD IPS display on the LG Optimus G Pro better than AMOLED
-
2.
The forbidden fruit: here are 7 great Android apps that Google does not allow on Play store
-
3.
All from Google I/O 2013
-
4.
Samsung officials confirm 5.9-inch Note III will come at IFA in September, Galaxy S4 to hit 10 million sales next week
