x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Samsung Galaxy S 4 benchmark tests (video)

0. phoneArena 15 Mar 2013, 04:13 posted on

Two versions of the Galaxy S 4 are in the cards - one with 1.9 GHz quad-core Snapdragon 600 processor, which will grace US carriers, and one with Samsung's Exynos 5 Octa internationally...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 06:43 1

52. THE-ONE (banned) (Posts: 28; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)


Go away you Apple baaaaaaa Troll

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 06:01 1

45. SGSatlantis (Posts: 226; Member since: 20 Jul 2011)


LMAO @ ur $tup1dity..lol

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 07:48

63. JunitoNH (Posts: 1898; Member since: 15 Feb 2012)


Now that was funny. Don't talk bad about $amsung here.

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 06:25 2

49. joey_sfb (Posts: 6044; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)


Why are you so angry with Samsung? We get it that you like your idevices. But people always buy what suit their need and budget. Will your constant whining change that?

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 04:32 5

13. amiroo (Posts: 269; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)


ooops one earn better scores..
one is king 2013.

but in overall there is not any clear difference when we same use with one & s4 ..

in software both of best this year.
but in design and build quality one is far better..it attract me more and more than s4/

posted on 16 Mar 2013, 14:26

91. majedlutfi (Posts: 36; Member since: 07 Feb 2013)


optimus g pro is still the king with even a better benchmarks.

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 04:40 9

18. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 949; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


iPhone5 = under powered
Galaxy IV = uninspired
Xperia Z = under-water
HTC One = unloved
Lumia920 = under-valued

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 05:28 4

37. raunak (Posts: 507; Member since: 12 Oct 2011)


iPhone 5 is not underpowered. It's just that the OS is utterly limited in functionality.

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 06:45 1

54. THE-ONE (banned) (Posts: 28; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)


Please that Lumia920 doesn't belong on those tiers. Midrange phone.

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 14:10

77. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 949; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)


I'll wager the Lumia 920 holds up fine against the best of your plastic junk made by Sammy, including the new Galaxy ;o)

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 04:52 1

28. dr_fajardo12 (Posts: 118; Member since: 26 Aug 2012)


r u recording this with and iPhone 5 or r u nerveus?

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 05:10

34. vladd100 (Posts: 56; Member since: 12 Jul 2012)


what about including xperiaZ and htc one in the benshmarks,so we can see the real results...............or are you just afraid of what you will get..

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 05:41 1

43. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


You really know nothing about benchmarks and chips do you.

Tell me what's the chip in the Xperia?
Tell me what is the difference between the Snapdragon chip in the HTC One and this?

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 09:33 1

68. voxmarc (Posts: 332; Member since: 22 Aug 2012)


heres the link see how S4 blow your devices away....enjoy crying....
http://www.youtube.com/user/AndroidAuthority?feature=g-hist

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 10:44

71. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Yeah it's 26000 vs 23000 basically.

I think the Octa scored around the same, but that one was clocked at 1.8ghz on a Chinese version.
It'll be interesting to see how 1.6ghz one compares.

Btw, John, the above video proves your test was flawed.
Maybe you were doing it with the power save mode turned on?

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 19:31 1

84. bigstrudel (Posts: 518; Member since: 20 Aug 2012)


Thermal throttling on Krait processors thats all. The unit was plugged in and the battery makes the unit warm while charging. Its the absolute worst thing to do when benchmarking in general.

posted on 16 Mar 2013, 03:25

88. Jonathan41 (Posts: 532; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)


The HTC One's 600 clocked in at 1.7GHz not 1.6GHz

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 05:38 2

41. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


I notice trolls commenting without even looking at the content of the article..

Anyways, there was obviously something very wrong with Antutu bench here.. it scored lower even than the S3 , haha.

Quadrant however showed that there's a beast ticking inside

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 05:40

42. jove39 (Posts: 1889; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


"With a quad-core PowerVR SGX544 GPU inside, the Exynos 5 Octa is blazing through graphics loads, too."

@Daniel P. - How you know its quad core gpu inside?

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 06:48

55. THE-ONE (banned) (Posts: 28; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)


They left Mali T658 and T657 or I forgot and using this Pvr Gpus.

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 06:03

46. Adithya7184 (Posts: 317; Member since: 05 Mar 2011)


i will not speak anything until i read a full review on..............gsmarena and not here....

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 06:43 1

53. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)


I hope the Galaxy SIV's reviewer will be Johhhhnnn V.

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 07:10

57. Adithya7184 (Posts: 317; Member since: 05 Mar 2011)


but still this site is not good when it comes to review....over in gsmarena, they test everything hell out of it.

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 07:42 1

61. THE-ONE (banned) (Posts: 28; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)


Well said and very true
Also they have more users and so many posts than PA
Like the verge Engadget
But I like the way they layerd the comment and reply section along with thumbs up and down
You don't get this on none of those

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 06:20

47. elmersunyc (Posts: 17; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)


The launch event should have been pushed back till the product is complete with the Exynos 5 Octa! Stop bashing snapdragon processors samsung! It also put all your US units in shame!

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 06:38 1

50. elmersunyc (Posts: 17; Member since: 14 Mar 2013)


I am a frequent buyer for samsung smartphones but despite all the good features and hardware, sometimes samsung is somewhat lacking the authentic feel on their devices.

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 07:31 2

60. henrickrw (Posts: 408; Member since: 16 Sep 2011)


I will get this device

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 09:25 2

66. voxmarc (Posts: 332; Member since: 22 Aug 2012)


i've said it before....this device is a beast....ive seen some mind changers on the comments...here are the test done by android authority vs DNA vs XZ vs Z10...and the results are...mind blowing.

http://www.youtube.com/user/AndroidAuthority?feature=g-hist

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 10:52 1

72. The_Innovation (Posts: 610; Member since: 18 Jul 2012)


Same thing again with the two different processors....why????

posted on 15 Mar 2013, 11:12

73. moronman66 (Posts: 162; Member since: 09 Jan 2012)


Everywhere I see it, the GS4 international version doesn't have the quad core GPU but the tri-core GPU, same as the iPhone 5, which is it really? I would be impressed for the quad core but either way it has a good chipset

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories