Samsung Galaxy Pocket delivers Gingerbread on the cheap
0. phoneArena 06 Mar 2012, 04:20 posted on
The Samsung Galaxy Pocket has just been announced becoming the most basic offering in the company's current Android portfolio. It comes with a 2.8-inch QVGA display and an 832MHz processor...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. plgladio (Posts: 314; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)
More phones, so anyone needed can go for one.. Hmmm since they are hardware manufacturers they release new phones every week. Whereas software developers release one version every 6 months..
2. pokharkarsaga (Posts: 384; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)
samsung mobiles are available for every class people.great job samsung.keep it up.nokia phones are costly than samsung with same specs.
3. thelegend6657 (unregistered)
Give me a lower MHz CPU and a bigger screen . As I guess people that buy that product will only use it to make phone calls / text but wants to play some apps
4. Firedrops (Posts: 249; Member since: 06 Sep 2011)
I don't get it, what's with Samsung's sudden mob of phones so low-end that they were considered low-ends even in jan 2011? Do they honestly need 10 600~800MHz phones on the market?
5. Crossblade (Posts: 210; Member since: 21 Apr 2005)
I am looking forward to phones that deliver ICS on the cheap!
6. tward291 (Posts: 559; Member since: 14 Feb 2012)
why continue to push out gingerbread phones really this is why android will fail
11. taz89 (Posts: 2014; Member since: 03 May 2011)
its a low end phone lol you think they going to announce ics on a super budget phone before the s3.
7. mercorp (Posts: 1027; Member since: 28 Jan 2012)
game boy pocket,now galaxy pocket,xperia mini lite!
8. c.hack (Posts: 609; Member since: 09 Dec 2009)
Another crap droid phone with a 2010 OS. Small phone for the small fandroid minds.
9. squallz506 (banned) (Posts: 1075; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)
that screen is way too small for an onscreen keyboard.
10. downphoenix (Posts: 3165; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)
just a bad design all around. No problem with low end, but would it have killed them to do better than 240x320 resolution on a 2.8 inch screen? Its going to look and feel awful to use. Maybe this is one of those $70 smartphones that Eric Schmidt was talking about.