Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 benchmark scores here: testing the Exynos 4412
0. phoneArena 24 Feb 2013, 12:46 posted on
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is probably the most exciting tablet to come out of MWC - it is a direct iPad mini competitor expected to retail for around the same price…
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
18. AnTuTu (Posts: 599; Member since: 14 Oct 2012)
Very nice Sammy. And also I am really very impressed with Alcatel's new champ as well :) way to go guys :)
21. kclgphilsbsa (Posts: 762; Member since: 21 Jan 2013)
will the galaxy note8 be the only device we'll see from samsung this MWC??
wer are the tab3s?
2. rihel_95 (Posts: 173; Member since: 21 Mar 2012)
I think PA refering 6000+ score as "pretty decent score" as HTC One has 12000 score on Quadrant. But clearly we can see that 6000+ score is a lot of score when compared with others(i.e HTC One X, S3 etc). For me, its a great score.
4. Whateverman (Posts: 3158; Member since: 17 May 2009)
Your comment made me wonder if HTC will get back into tablets with a design based on the One. Throw in the Snapdragon 800 and they may have another hit on their hands.
8. kartik4u98 (Posts: 511; Member since: 19 May 2012)
But...Snapdragon 800 isn't out yet...
I think that 600 will be enough considering the perfomance of it..
23. Whateverman (Posts: 3158; Member since: 17 May 2009)
Hey, technically neither is the 600 but somebody has to be the first. Can you imagine an even more powerful chip than the 600 in a tablet? Oh, yeah!
17. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5483; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
as long as they don't grossly overprice it like they did with their last suite of Tablets they should do fine.
26. terabyteRouser (Posts: 407; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
problem is, is that 6000 is a last gen score. def don't want to buy a new under performing device when better stuff is already here.
3. drpain (Posts: 85; Member since: 07 Feb 2013)
1280x800 is not good enough for 2013, especially on an 8 inch device. Who the hell designs these things.....?
5. urtard (banned) (Posts: 82; Member since: 30 Jan 2013)
and who do you think you are to say what the standards are? rofl fatass neckbeard
6. maccess (Posts: 478; Member since: 16 Jan 2013)
the designer just want to avoid the lawsuit from apple i think.. lol.. but in terms of performance & features i think it's more than decent..
7. g2a5b0e (Posts: 1929; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
Why is everyone a resolution snob all of a sudden? There are no tablets in the 7-8" range that have hit 1080 yet. The highest I've seen is the Nook HD with a 1440x900 resolution on a 7" screen. Considering you don't hold a tablet anywhere near your face like a phone, 1280x800 on a 8" is more than adequate.
12. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
What are you saying?
That you hold a tablet at twice greater distance than a phone?
Then why would you use a tablet in the first place?
The relative viewing surface size would be almost the same!
When a look at ipad mini from 35 cm (a bit more than one ft), I can see so much pixelization it really bothers me.
22. g2a5b0e (Posts: 1929; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
I'm not sure that anything you said makes any sense.
24. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Let me dumb it down to you then.. at sub 200ppi, the jaggines is totally visible on a tablet, if you hold it at normal viewing distance.
The screen needs to be at least in the 230+ ppi range, to look decently sharp.
You can make it look sharp by holding the tablet at 2ft distance, but then what's the point?
8'' tablet at 2ft looks as large as the 4.8'' phone from 1ft
25. g2a5b0e (Posts: 1929; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
Judging from the thumbs on your last, no one else understood what you were saying either.
14. _Bone_ (Posts: 2061; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
True. If Samsung goes bold and cuts under the iPad Mini (that's the one it's going against), at $299 it'd be a great buy. Better specs and slightly better resolution, microSD slot, Wacom digitizer, AirView & MultiView, Jelly Bean experience, low power consumption, great package.
If it goes over the iPad Mini price however (with the digitizer it's unfortunately probable), then much ado about nothing, I'll rather look for the updated Nexus 7, iPad Mini or Nexus 10 for slightly more around June.
9. k1ng617 (Posts: 234; Member since: 13 Oct 2009)
Wow it really is like they just stuck a Galaxy Note 2 into an enlarging ray and poof Galaxy Note 8.0. Same specs just bigger...
10. Rafyvitto (Posts: 2; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)
Using quadrant to benchamrk todays devices is a joke....using Egl 1.0 graphics to benchmark an egl 3.0 directx9 capable device is unacceptable, stop using outdated benchmarking tools, use epiccitadel.GLbenchmark 2.5 etc etc....
11. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
The first Tegra 4 benchmarks!!
The scores are nothing short of staggering:
Antutu - 36 000
Quadrant - 16 000
Glbenchmark 2.5 offscreen - 57fps
15. Hemoroid (Posts: 72; Member since: 13 Feb 2013)
This Sammy octacore is a best, HTC one cannot compare! And you applefanboys just stop wining...
27. terabyteRouser (Posts: 407; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
but htc one is twice as fast? what are you saying?
16. p0rkguy (Posts: 677; Member since: 23 Nov 2010)
Only Samsung fanboys would consider this...
19. DerryAhmad (Posts: 179; Member since: 05 May 2012)
I was thinking to get this device to replace my Galaxy Tab 7,7. The Note 8.0 has newer OS, the S-Pen functionality and better processor. But I like the Tab 7,7 aluminium design better not to mention it has S-Amoled display, and bigger battery.
Wonder why Samsung ditch the Tab 7,7 design and premium build and go with the plasticky and tired S-III /Note II/S-III Mini design??
20. kclgphilsbsa (Posts: 762; Member since: 21 Jan 2013)
im hoping that they just want to make the space filled.. and when the next generation of this note8 will arrive with the next gen note and note10.1
anyway, when will the tab3 be unveiled?
how abt the note 10.1 2?