Samsung Galaxy NX hands-on
0. phoneArena 20 Jun 2013, 15:50 posted on
Whereas as the other models aimed to make snapping photos simple, the Galaxy NX brings the full arsenal of your traditional interchangeable lens camera – with the vast sharing and deep functionality of the Android experience. When its purpose is to take stunning and crisp photos, it’s...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
14. james004 (Posts: 486; Member since: 15 May 2013)
so its 20mp APS sensor, alright i give it props for that. its legitmiate dslr. BUT i dont like android ONLY on it, there should basic old java based os that give photogropher alot more option than camera app in android. or atleast give option to shoot RAW so we can fix it on computer.
24. akki20892 (Posts: 3874; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
right.....still it's not DSLR camera it's a digital camera.
21. zippolite28 (Posts: 104; Member since: 28 Sep 2012)
I would never buy this when i have a proper Dslr to click and Proper PC to Edit them
2. jdoee100 (Posts: 334; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)
I wonder what canon and nikon gonna do next? Will they follow suit and combine android with their camera, or stay the course and possibly get left behind?
5. ArtSim98 (Posts: 3534; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)
I don't know what they're going to do but one thing is sure> they wont fall behind.
7. FireBlast (Posts: 6; Member since: 16 Jan 2013)
It's an interesting concept. The sensor is good and coupled with a good lens can produce great images. But I don't think Nikon and Canon will follow up, or anytime soon, because of 2 reasons:
1. It's a niche market, aimed at people that like gadgets more than cameras. It will appeal to people who wish to upgrade from a phone camera, but still want to retain some of advantages of a smartphone (sharing, facebook, apps, etc.). However a photograph enthusiast will look at it with suspicion. The ergonomics are flawed. No sane person will trade physical dials/buttons on a camera for a touch interface.
2. Nikon and Canon can't care less about mirrorless cameras. They've chosen their allegiance to reside with slr designs. While it might change in the future, the big players in mirrorless at the moment are Sony, Fuji, Olympus, Panasonic.
It's probably a stepping stone from which they can build an entire ecosystem.
16. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)
The one Canon make from CES earlier this year was kinda crappy n a tiny screen.
23. akki20892 (Posts: 3874; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
ok they nothing gonna do, they will stay in same thing that they are doing right now. they don't need this kind of stuff in their camera. it doesn't mean everyone will buy this instead of canon and nikon.
nikon and canon are the best in camera. i can see you are pure sammy fan.
3. chrislars (Posts: 77; Member since: 11 Apr 2013)
Good camera for what it is... If it were me I would rather spend $1299 on a full framed body, but everyone has their preferences. Also the time it takes to turn on, I could have taken multiple shots with any other DSLR. You would also be limited to 13 lenses, but considering that this camera is primarily geared toward Android Fans and Beginner's experimenting with Photography, the slow 18-55 kit lens will most likely be good enough for the average user. If I am going to buy a "Phamera" for uploading to "Instagram" or "Facebook" I will get the Galaxy S4 Zoom. If I am going to buy a DSLR then it will be from a Camera Company... Needless to say this will probably sell well, but I'd rather just keep android on my phone.
8. FireBlast (Posts: 6; Member since: 16 Jan 2013)
The problem is a FF body is like you've said $1299 (the cheapest) and the lens are also very expensive. On a similar context people can say they would rather spend $60000 on MF camera
11. chrislars (Posts: 77; Member since: 11 Apr 2013)
Lenses vary in price from $100- $100,000 (if not more) so it depends what kind of quality you want. Like I said everyone has their preferences, But if we are comparing similar specs, my money would be on Canon or Nikon for the price. I'm not saying that this isn't a good camera, because it has very impressive specs. I just prefer Camera companies with years of experience in the field.
4. Potato. (banned) (Posts: 607; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)
Boot up time? Because it powered by Android.
6. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 3101; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)
wow you clearly never have used an iPhone before.
20. zippolite28 (Posts: 104; Member since: 28 Sep 2012)
Where did IPhone come from .... its about Boot up time compared to DSLR ...
25. Potato. (banned) (Posts: 607; Member since: 14 Jun 2013)
iPhones are slow.
We are talking about android here, where did iPhone come from?
Its about the boot time of a DSLR powered by Android.
You re going off the topic
9. ocilfa (Posts: 334; Member since: 03 Aug 2012)
Ugh... Why are the TFT lcd's praised so much now? "Realistic colors" my butt. Honestly, it just feels like we are regressing in tech. They can calibrate an amoled if they actually wanted to.
10. MCrapp (Posts: 318; Member since: 07 Apr 2013)
They can calibrate amoleds but they can't change the price! Amoled price!
12. ph00ny (Posts: 989; Member since: 26 May 2011)
Lot of these "tech" writers automatically write LCD, more realistic color.
I remember reading an actual display comparison between iphone4, SGS1, and Droid X(not sure) and iphone's retina display was off color as much as the SGS1 in the opposite direction of the color gamut. I think Droid X's faded looking color was rated closer in color reproduction than either devices
Edit: Found it
Gamut Too Large
Gamut Too Small
13. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 3101; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)
I remember back in the SGS1, Nexus One days, a AMOLED display was in high demand, they loved the bright punchy colors and amazing viewing angles. But ever since this new PPI craze that has been rained down upon us, AMOLED is always bashed now because mainly it's pentile matrix. I personally don't see a problem with it, I never had issues with the SGS1 or SGS3 and I don't see anybody complaining about the SGS4 even tho it is pentile as well. But now everybody wants NATURAL COLORS, times have changed so much.
19. SleepingOz (unregistered)
Couldn't agree more!
Although it's pentile, the AMOLED panel of the GSIV has no problem whatsoever with natural colour reproduction, in-depth tests show that it's on par with the best LCD out there.
15. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)
This is a bad a$$ android camera. It's good Samsung giving consumers options built in Android cam with interchangeable lenses WiFi w/lte connectivity.
17. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
The NX lenses are actually really good and cheap. Should buy now and sell on craigslist. If this doesn't take off, just return the NX lenses.
18. steelicon (Posts: 317; Member since: 02 Apr 2011)
How long will this camera boot from a fresh battery pull?
22. exxxius (Posts: 5; Member since: 21 Jun 2013)
WiFi & ANDROID system rocks! but let's see its other features & a full review of Samsung Galaxy NX @ here I found the most complete review of this nice camera :