Samsung ATIV S vs Nokia Lumia 900 vs HTC Titan II: specs comparison
Share:
 |
| Design | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Device type | Smart phone | Smart phone | Smart phone |
| OS | Windows Phone 8 | Windows Phone 7.5 Refresh, 7.5 Mango | Windows Phone 7.5 Mango |
| Form factor | Candybar | Candybar | Candybar |
| Dimensions | 5.40 x 2.78 x 0.34 (137.2 x 70.5 x 8.7 mm) | 5.03 x 2.70 x 0.45 (127.8 x 68.5 x 11.5 mm) | 5.20 x 2.70 x 0.50 (132 x 69 x 13 mm) |
| Weight | 4.76 oz (135 g) the average is 4.1 oz (118 g) | 5.64 oz (160 g) the average is 4.1 oz (118 g) | 5.20 oz (147 g) the average is 4.1 oz (118 g) |
| Side Keys | Left: Volume control Right: Camera shutter, Lock/Unlock key | Right: Volume control, Camera shutter, Lock/Unlock key | |
| Colors | Black, Blue, White |
| Display | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical size | 4.8 inches | 4.30 inches | 4.70 inches |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
Pixel density | 306 ppi | 217 ppi | 199 ppi |
Technology | Super AMOLED | AMOLED | S-LCD |
| Colors | 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 | |
| Touchscreen | Capacitive, Multi-touch | Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| Features | Light sensor, Proximity sensor | Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Scratch-resistant glass | Light sensor, Proximity sensor |
| Battery | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Talk time | 7.00 hours the average is 8 h (506 min) | 4.30 hours the average is 8 h (506 min) | |
| Stand-by time | 14.6 days (350 hours) the average is 20 days (481 h) | 12.2 days (293 hours) the average is 20 days (481 h) | |
| Music playback | 60.00 hours | ||
| Capacity | 2300 mAh | 1830 mAh | 1730 mAh |
| Type | Li - Ion | Li - Ion | Li - Ion |
| Hardware | |||
|---|---|---|---|
System chip | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 APQ8055 | Qualcomm |
Processor | Dual core, 1500 MHz, Krait | Single core, 1400 MHz, Scorpion | Single core, 1500 MHz, Snapdragon S2 |
| Graphics processor | Adreno 225 | Adreno 205 | Yes |
System memory | 1024 MB RAM (Dual-channel: Yes) / DDR2 (500 MHz) | 512 MB RAM (Dual-channel: Yes) / DDR2 (333 MHz) | 512 MB RAM |
| Built-in storage | 16 GB | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| Storage expansion | |||
| Slot Type | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC |
| Camera | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Camera | 8 megapixels, Immobile | 8 megapixels, Immobile | 16 megapixels, Immobile |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED | Dual LED |
| Aperture size | F2.2 | F2.6 | |
| Focal length (35mm equivalent) | 28mm | ||
| Features | Auto focus, Geo tagging | Auto focus, Touch to focus, Video stabilizer, Exposure control, Geo tagging | Auto focus, Face detection, ISO control, Digital zoom, Geo tagging, Panorama |
| Camcorder | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 1920x1080 (1080p HD) | 1280x720 (720p HD) (30 fps) | 1280x720 (720p HD) (30 fps) | |
| Recording format | MPEG4, H.264 | ||
| Features | Video calling | Continuous autofocus in a video, Video calling | Continuous autofocus in a video, Video calling |
| Front-facing camera | 1.9 megapixels | 1.3 megapixels | 1.3 megapixels |
| Technology | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| GSM | 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz | 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz | 850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz |
| UMTS | 850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz | 850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz | 850, 1900, 2100 MHz |
| LTE | 700 MHz Class 17, 1700/2100 MHz | 1700/2100 MHz | |
| Data | HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS | LTE, HSDPA+ (4G) 21.1 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s, UMTS, EDGE | LTE, HSPA (unspecified), UMTS, EDGE, GPRS |
Share:
Some interesting facts about the finally cleared Facebook aquisition of 
Windows Phone 8 release date to be October 29th, devices arriving early 
Related phones
Samsung ATIV S
- Specifications
- News (27)
- Review 8.5/10
- User Reviews
20 Comments
1. ajac09 posted on 29 Aug 2012, 16:11 12 1
yeah we all know it will be the TOP windows phone as of right now.
14. neutralguy posted on 29 Aug 2012, 22:56 8 0
yep. I agree with that. But only for a week. Can't wait for nokia to release its newest lumia. Hoping to have pureview.
16. Jimstar posted on 30 Aug 2012, 00:59 3 0
it's not even on sale yet, how could it be the top windows phone "as of right now"?
It might not even be top windows phone when it launches if Nokia isn't just bluffing...
2. som posted on 29 Aug 2012, 16:46 7 17
Galaxy Ativ is going to kill Nokia. Nokia will file bankruptcy very soon.
4. lubba posted on 29 Aug 2012, 17:52 0 0
The only way Nokia will go down is if they keep sucking ATT's balls. My assumption is most will try to avoid ATT. They will be satisfied with either an HTC or Samsung hero phone on their carrier. Example Tmo and the rumored odyssey (?AtivS). Sorry no mid range Nokia for me nor waisting time and money switching to ATT just for a pureview Nokia phone.
7. mudassarfa posted on 29 Aug 2012, 18:30 0 12
Nokia is only good for making basic model phones.
8. pikapowerize (banned) posted on 29 Aug 2012, 21:04 3 1
nokia will make better Windows Phone devices...
sorry but samsung is better wtih android... but if nokia go android.. samsung is threaten... samsung was making WP devices a long time now.. and they dont even give it ads like they do to Android devices..nokia just make a WP this year yet it is the #1 WP manufacturer...
so i think sammy should continue to spport their own OS, TIZEN coz it will have a future..coz they say that HTML5 is the future.. and make more android devices....
same goes to HTC!!!
as for my opinion...if you buy WP, better buy a lumia.... rumor has it is that nokia lumia pureview is coming!!!
17. snowgator posted on 30 Aug 2012, 02:35 1 0
I am hoping the fact that Sammy bragged on this today shows they are taking WP8 much more seriously than their WP 7 offerings. The Focus family were top performers of each generation that they were offered in, so just a little more support and some advertising would do wonders. Tizen is a much more expensive and long road to travel than WP is. While I am curious to see it in action, Samsung could thrive in both Android and WP with the exclusives they are developing.
Of course, Nokia is the premier WP handset maker. No doubt. Just saying this looks like a beast and is made from some good material. Well worth the luck if you are interested in WP 8.
18. pikapowerize (banned) posted on 30 Aug 2012, 03:06 0 0
i really dont know how will tizen gonna be expensive..sammy should make it avaiable to all market... the bada line was terrible and expensive..symbian is better....
so sammy should cheaper the hardware of this tizen..
remember that firefox OS is also HTML5? but mozilla said that this OS can run on $50 phone...so samsung should do the ame if they want to push tizen...
9. Nookie4u posted on 29 Aug 2012, 21:17 1 1
Specs aside, i still prefer Nokia's design, although now it's getting a bit lame to recycle N9's body.
11. pikapowerize (banned) posted on 29 Aug 2012, 21:34 2 0
they should make major changes.... i'll wait for lumia pureview..
but honestly ativ s is a sexy phone... i dont knw why samsung's design with android is terrible but this is lovable...
10. Alistaire posted on 29 Aug 2012, 21:30 2 1
other than having a dual core processor, higher screen resolution and running on WP8. The Nokia Lumia 900 still feel like a much solid build phone than the Ativ S
15. jove39 posted on 29 Aug 2012, 23:37 1 0
Underneath its SGS3 hardware...let wait and see what Nokia has to show!
20. maryaaadil posted on 30 Aug 2012, 07:20 0 0
PA honestly speaking you are killing time there is no way to compare old generation wp7 phones with wp8 phones.
