Samsung- and Intel-backed Tizen OS is serious, $4M-in-prizes-serious
0. phoneArena 09 Jul 2013, 09:40 posted on
Well, we have to give it to you – there has been a certain amount of skepticism on whether the Samsung- and Intel-backed Tizen OS won't just die out before it ever reaches any end users. With the former two reaffirming their support, and with what Tizen now has in store for developers, it suffices to say that we're feeling much more confident about the open-source platform...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. roldefol (Posts: 3260; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)
Does this mean there's a Verizon Tizen on the horizon?
2. KINGJUAN27 (Posts: 204; Member since: 02 Jul 2012)
It will flop, just like Bada. LOL Samsuck! :D
3. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Samsuck? What's next? Samduck? Sam*uck?
Your Samsung nicknames are getting old and lame dude...
5. Dr.Phil (Posts: 1008; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
First of all, Bada is now integrated into Tizen so it didn't necessarily die out or flop. Secondly, if you consider Bada a flop then you should also consider Windows Phone a flop considering Bada had the same market share as Windows Phone when it was released.
You also have to consider that it's not just Samsung backing Tizen but also Intel. I doubt Intel and Samsung would just partner up and throw money at something they think will flop.
6. roldefol (Posts: 3260; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)
"Bada had the same market share as Windows Phone when it was released"
Not in the US. Around here, bada never exceeded 0.0%.
7. iushnt (Posts: 948; Member since: 06 Feb 2013)
last year , bada had better market share compared to wp worldwide
10. g2a5b0e (Posts: 3410; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)
Cool story, but he was clearly referring to worldwide market share & not just one country.
11. roldefol (Posts: 3260; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)
When I see people talk about recent bada or Symbian market share, I can't help but shrug. If it never made it to the US, I don't believe in it.
12. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)
World doesn't begin and end at US and from market perspective even US is realizing that (with Apple trying to make a dent in Indian/Chinese markets) so shed the ego wake up or other way round whichever you prefer :)
13. roldefol (Posts: 3260; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)
I know there is a world outside the US, but if you look at the current glogal smartphone market, the major *software* players are American. Google, Apple, Microsoft. So I don't have a whole lot to say for Euro (Symbian) or Asian (bada) OSes that ultimately fizzled out.
14. Dr.Phil (Posts: 1008; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
You can't fairly call into question U.S. market share as it was at a disadvantage given the fact that no carrier offered a device with the OS on it. By the time there was some signs of Samsung bringing Bada devices to the US, they had already decided to integrate Bada into Tizen.
I believe Tizen has a chance because the people who are help making it happen are being very smart about the whole process. They aren't rushing it to the market, but instead they are giving it time to develop a good enough app ecosystem.
8. rdeleonp (Posts: 44; Member since: 21 Jan 2012)
HP and Intel?
15. Dr.Phil (Posts: 1008; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
So you are applying a server processor to the smartphone OS market? Not to mention that Itanium lasted for over a decade and is still being produced today, albeit in low numbers.
You can't point to one bad partnership as a reason for Tizen to go bad. Not to mention it's actually a lot more companies than Intel and Samsung that have a stake in Tizen. I just mention Samsung and Intel as the big two of the bunch. Tizen's board of directors comprises of other big tech companies such as Panasonic, Huawei, Fujitsu, NEC, and Sprint. So, I think this a very different entity we are looking at here, but nice try.
9. TheLolGuy (Posts: 483; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)
Yep. Intel is a huge player, and they're investing in it hard because no other manufacturers are that interested in using Intel's Atom processor.
Most of the well-to-do countries have significant penetration, now whats left are the poorer countries, and they don't do well with Intel's high tax. I'm guessing Android OEMs don't want to work with them, so they're going to just create another OS that will ally with them from the start.
16. ojdidit84 (Posts: 437; Member since: 16 Jul 2011)
I have one word to say about Intel backing something.
4. sriuslywtf (Posts: 297; Member since: 09 Jul 2013)
For a new comer in OS turf ruled by Android and Ios. Its necessary.. Hopefully it pays off..
17. speckledapple (Posts: 892; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)
I wonder how this is going to play out. I can only imagine how it could flourish but with all the competition in the area, this will have to be the equal to god's hand to be successful.