Report: Phablets to outsell small tablets in 2014
0. phoneArena 22 Dec 2013, 19:25 posted on
At first, the founder of Technalysis Research, Bob O'Donnell, thought that phablets "were ridiculous," especially when making or taking a call. "But over time, they grow on you," he said. Now he forecasts that 175 million phablets will be sold globally in 2014. He says that figure will outsell the 165 million small tablets (8 inches or smaller) that he sees getting rung up next year...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. bernwong0274 (Posts: 7; Member since: 13 Oct 2013)
Where is Sony Xperia Z Ultra and where is Malaysia standing in your article, over here the sales of phablets is almost 80%.
16. taikucing (unregistered)
not interested in some random countries like the one you mentioned.
2. JojoGo101 (Posts: 211; Member since: 17 Dec 2012)
Impossible. Small tablets have better value than phablets. For instance, to get the experience of a Nexus 7 in a phablet, you'd need to pay top dollar. Small tablets cannot be overthrowned, but phone will turn into phablets.
9. fanboy1974 (Posts: 1148; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)
Sounds like you've never own a phablet. It's redundant to own a 7" tablet with a 5.7" phablet. I was in that same situation and returned my 2013 Nexus 7" when I got my Note 3. The reason why I got the Nexus 7 was because I had a iPhone 5s. That was actually a good pair.
And I bet money Samsung is aiming for 5.9 to 6 inches for the Note 4. With phones getting bigger I don't see Google doing another Nexus 7". I see Nexus 8" next year with a resolution greater than 1080p.
And lets not forget that it's much easier to put a phablet in your pocket compared to a 7" tablet.
3. mr.techdude (Posts: 542; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)
The only decent phablet is Samsung note 3 if only it had lag free ui then I'll consider it as first to none. The Sony Xperia z is good but way too big to carry around about, and crapy battery life for a phablet is not an excuse. HTC one max is also good but if only it had an ois camera, faster processor and much less chunkier.
4. rodneyej1 (Posts: 3518; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)
With how great everything is about my 1520 I can see devices over 5" taking over.. This is by far the best experience I've ever had on any device.. These larger devices just have so much to offer.
17. taikucing (unregistered)
bla bla bla... whatever you say, salesgirl.
21. ihavenoname (Posts: 1320; Member since: 18 Aug 2013)
With how great everything is about my Note 3 I can see devices over 5" taking over.. This is by far the best experience I've ever had on any device.. These larger devices just have so much to offer.
25. rodneyej1 (Posts: 3518; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)
If you think your note 3 is good I don't have a problem with that.. I could care less, it's called maturity.. But, it obviously hurts your pathetic little feelings to hear someone praise WP.. Grow up❕
24. rodneyej1 (Posts: 3518; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)
Wow, you sure are fearful of WP.. Thanks for constantly proving how important it is.
6. imkyle (Posts: 979; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)
4.7-5 inch screens are good and plenty for me for my phone. I have a separate 7 inch tablet and I am happy with carrying both.
7. anewhope6924 (Posts: 1; Member since: 05 Dec 2013)
I love my galaxy mega!! Sellin the nexus 7
8. jellmoo (Posts: 650; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)
That's a pretty ridiculous definition for a phablet. Anything over 5 inches in screen size is pretty meaningless. Making the G2 a phablet when it's small bezels keep it in the same size category as a G4 or One is a flawed definition. Heck, the Z1 is a considerably larger device, yet wouldn't be a phablet with this definition.
Making the criteria to back up a statement like this is just silly.
11. nctx77 (Posts: 453; Member since: 03 Sep 2013)
Now all the robots are loving analyst predictions LOL!
12. tmcr7 (Posts: 152; Member since: 02 Nov 2011)
Question: With the definition of a phablet as a device with a larger than 5" screen, is the Galaxy Note 10.1 SIM card version a phablet?
13. Topcat488 (Posts: 1124; Member since: 29 Sep 2012)
In my opinion, Phablets start at 5.3"... The Dell Streak was 5" but still only considered a large phone. Still ahead of the times though, too bad Android wasn't what it is today. Maybe then Dell would have had a chance. 0.o
14. rodneyej1 (Posts: 3518; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)
Do you say that just because the Note 3 is 5.3"?.. I would say that we should be considering anything ≤5.5" a "phablet".. Oh well.. Lol❕. None of it even matter anyways.. I've been using this 1520 for 3 days now, and to tell the truth it's already beginning to look smaller.. It doesn't have that "OMG this is huge" feel to it that it had the first day... Nevertheless, I don't think I could go any bigger than 6.3" because tha dang thing just has to fit in my pocket comfortably.. When will the madness stop❕❕.. Lol.
15. xfire99 (Posts: 443; Member since: 14 Mar 2012)
Note 3 is 5.7". Phablet phenomen started with Samsung release of Galaxy Note GT-N7000 5.3", first device ever been called as "phablet" and all others started to COPY Samsung.
18. taikucing (unregistered)
Nah, Dell Streak is the first. When other phones are still 3.5 - 4 inches, Dell wowed the world with its huge 5" phone.
26. rodneyej1 (Posts: 3518; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)
So you're saying that Everyone copied Nokia because now everyone is focusing on Camera tech❔
19. kaikuheadhunterz (Posts: 692; Member since: 18 Jul 2013)
I agree with this prediction, although I'm still waiting for a low-end phablet
22. COZMAN (Posts: 99; Member since: 28 Nov 2013)
Flooding the market with too may options fuelled by greed but creating confusion instead. Have a G PAD 8.3. Perfect size.
23. Desmund (Posts: 74; Member since: 01 Nov 2012)
Anything over 5.5 to me is a Phablet.
Honestly the two phones I've seen HTC One Max and Nokia 1520 I don't want anywhere near me as anything above 5.5 is just too much. really the sweet spot for me is 4.7-5.3 for a phone.
I don't know a whole lot about the G PAD, but wouldn't having a G2 make that a bit redundant?