Purported Galaxy S IV benchmark results appear
0. phoneArena 12 Feb 2013, 06:55 posted on
And here it is - the Galaxy S IV has finally appeared in the online database of GLBenchmark. Of course, we shouldn't take this information too seriously yet, because it may easily be some other device, but for now the sources are pretty excited about these results, and even if there's the slightest chance of them being true, this means that it's impossible for us to ignore them...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
98. pyradark (Posts: 833; Member since: 10 Jun 2012)
whats the point of watching movie on a 5inch
if you are not looking straight on to it?
i think phone is for personal use
so you want people saw what youve been texting even emails
106. alexzibrit (Posts: 67; Member since: 15 Jan 2013)
ok please correct that last line, grammar wise it's terrible, and If I have a phone that big it's for multimedia purposes such as watching movies, and I don't think I'll be the only one watching it, so I'll like for other people to be able to see, or me if I just so happen to need to move across and son't want to move my phone
107. alexzibrit (Posts: 67; Member since: 15 Jan 2013)
And Plus I love Amoled Screens sure they are over saturated and the reproduction is completely natural, but you should know that samsung has given you the ability to change the settings if you so please, Plus I Love the over-saturation, If i wanted natural colours I would buy a blackberry curve or something, I love to see the colours pop, Since when did we care about natural colours when years ago we use to turn up the contrast to insane levels saying the the "natural colours" were too muted, mankind needs to make up it's mind on what it wants from a smartphone
113. TMach (Posts: 454; Member since: 29 Dec 2011)
Seldom join in stupid debates because they are simply that, stupid. I have the HTC One X+ which is generally acnowledged as perhaps the best screen out there to date and you will be hard pushed when watching a film on it to suggest it is better than that of the Xperia T which I also own. The screen on the Xperia Z is much better than that of the Xperia T and I am not sure there is much debate there, so what is likely to be wrong with this given that the same arguments apply. I love the screen of my Xperia T and marginally prefer watching films on it to the HTC. As for viewing angles, I don't share my media content with others, I am usually plugged into my headphones when enjoying my media content, anyway if they want to watch a movie they can pretty darn well go pay for it, I do. If I do want a friend to watch it, they can borrow the phone and enjoy in full stereo, afterall, who wants to listen to the sound through the speakers of a mobile phone!
96. pyradark (Posts: 833; Member since: 10 Jun 2012)
yeah Sony is super sucks on hardware, theyre always miles outdated, ohh wait 3rd best selling smart phone and 2nd best selling android in UK... what is happening i thought Xperia 2012 is outdated and no ones gonna buy it!!
HATERS & BITTERS
14. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Okay this doesn't make any sense at all.
Why would a galaxy s4 use an old dual core snapdragon ?!?
19. aklipii (Posts: 9; Member since: 29 Dec 2010)
they would never show such information before releasing a phone.
23. jove39 (Posts: 1838; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)
Soc could be MSM8960T instead...with adreno320 as benchmark scores suggest...I'll be really happy...if samsung and qualcomm team up and surprise all with MSM8974 inside :)
57. JWS65 (Posts: 32; Member since: 22 Jan 2013)
I think this is probably their internal testing prototype. They do that to compare and evaluate the performance of new Exynos version.
27. motty (Posts: 84; Member since: 13 Dec 2012)
I reall dont understand haha wat ever launch it now Sammey
31. imkyle (Posts: 1072; Member since: 18 Nov 2010)
I do not think the 8 core processor will be in the Galaxy S IV. It's too new and I think it may be in the Note III when they launch that in the Summer/Fall of 2013.
88. alexzibrit (Posts: 67; Member since: 15 Jan 2013)
They most Likely will, just because of the fact that the always release the international version of their phone with an Exynos Processor and then change it depending on the region
32. GALAXY-STORM (Posts: 328; Member since: 13 Oct 2012)
Hope the international version never comes with the s4 pro chip set. We need octa core.
37. sonyisdead (banned) (Posts: 30; Member since: 30 Jan 2013)
S4 pro is terribly inefficient, overheats to the point your phone explode, and can't even handle 1080p.
40. GALAXY-STORM (Posts: 328; Member since: 13 Oct 2012)
It's becasue i don't like the snapdragon chips. I want sgs4 to be unique and different from other flagships that are powered by qualcomm's chips despite being powerfull.
52. abhishek48 (Posts: 164; Member since: 19 Feb 2012)
Hahahahaha.... Have you used DNA..? it has snapdragon s4 pro and 1080p screen and its the best on market.. Rest in peace
64. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
The Nexus 4 performs much better than the DNA, so I would hardly say that it is the best in the market. If the DNA proves anything, it is that 1080p screens need something more powerful than the S4 pro.
82. HDShatter (Posts: 1021; Member since: 17 Jan 2013)
If you think the s4 pro runs hot you better get your oven mitts out if you think the S4 will use an exynos 5.
50. cretinick (Posts: 148; Member since: 25 Jan 2011)
You know that the Samsung Octa core is not REALLY an octa core, do you?
I will probably not going to buy an SIV, but if I would, I will want the best SoC available. Not the one that is different, just to be different.
If Samsung really going to use Qualcomm over they own Soc, that is because their SoC is not good enough OR is not ready.
89. alexzibrit (Posts: 67; Member since: 15 Jan 2013)
Then Why is it that Even Samsung's Dual Core Exynos Processor won plenty of awards upon it's release ?
42. CreeDiddy (Posts: 668; Member since: 04 Nov 2011)
I know that these are preliminary specs, but if that is the best that we have in the SIV it is no comparison to the iPad 4. That means an A7 will crush this processor even at dual core. So I can't imagine an A7 quad core going up against this SIV. It would be a complete land slide in terms of benchmarks and performance.
48. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
The A7 in the iPhone 5s won't be nearly as powerful as the A6x. The A6x is built for a huge battery and to push the high resolution. Don't be surprised if they just retweak the A6 for the iphone 5s.
67. CreeDiddy (Posts: 668; Member since: 04 Nov 2011)
From what I understand the A6 and A6X chipset architecture is the same. They have improved the speed of the GPU chip.
101. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Yes the GPU is a quad core instead of the dual in the iPhone 5. Plus the A6X is clocked way higher. Like I said, a huge difference and whatever is in the iPhone 5s won't come close to either the GS4 or iPad 4.
49. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Just think about the difference between an i5 dual core and anything ARM. Comparing the A6X with a mobile phone chip set is.......LOL
The iPhone 5s or 6 won't be nearly as powerful as the iPad 4 and neither would any mobile handset. The iPhone 6 will push less than 720p and whatever is in the GS4 will push 1080p max. The A6x has to push 2048 x 1500. Its just a completely different class.
65. howardbarrett (Posts: 45; Member since: 11 Jan 2013)
CreeDiddy could be right. If the A7 is based on the PowerVR series 6, we're looking at 100 GFLOPS at the very least. ipad 4 is rated at 76.8 GFLOPS in comparison.
84. HDShatter (Posts: 1021; Member since: 17 Jan 2013)
-yawn- Gtx 780 ti is going to be 4 teraflops of double precision with 6gb vram.
86. CreeDiddy (Posts: 668; Member since: 04 Nov 2011)
Can you provide a dedicated GPU into an iPad, let alone an iPhone? This is an apples to oranges comparison. You are talking about an NVidia GPU desktop graphics card vs. onboard GPU embedded into the CPU of an iPhone/iPad.
102. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Not if they under clock it for the puny battery, which they will.
45. lucasho2312 (Posts: 18; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)
i dont this this is true. S IV should be better than this.
55. JWS65 (Posts: 32; Member since: 22 Jan 2013)
Yeah, I don't believe this is the real GS4. It's probably their internal testing model to compare with Exynos 5 performance.
There is chance that they might go with S600 or S800 snapdragon for US models but there is no way they will put the same old S4 MSM8960 from last year's phone into GS4.
46. erdpov (Posts: 67; Member since: 07 Dec 2012)
Here is a champion, my dear sammy! nevertheless I wish other companies to make awsome phones to compete with sammy.
53. DanMarino13 (Posts: 63; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)
I hope Samsung will get a little smarter with how they manufacture their phones. Everyone loves high end specs, myself included, but a 5" screen is really off putting to me, and i know many others who don't enjoy this trend.
At the same time i know there's a lot of desire for large screen phones! What i hope on a daily basis, is Samsung releasing the S4 in at least 2 different screen sizes.
I know it's possible to keep the high end specs in a smaller form! I personally think 4.3 - 4.6 screen size is the sweet spot! Anyone think of a reason as to why they wouldn't consider this an option?
56. maxican16 (Posts: 364; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)
They will have an SIV mini I'm sure. One reason I could think as to why they would lessen the internals though, would be to prevent stealing the SIV's thunder. ASUS does the same with their tablets. There can only be one top dog is their idea I guess.
60. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
It isn't the manufacturers problem. The iphone 5 is less than 720p and that screen resolution is fine because they never mention the actual resolution, they just say 326 ppi.
With Android on the other hand, people see 4.3 inches but only 720p. They don't realize that it is 342 ppi and automatically assume it is low end next to the 1080p screens.
The Acer cloud mobile and Xperia V has the same internals and resolution as the One X and GS3, yet Android fans refuse to call the former high end phones but have no problem calling the latter high end phones.
The Xiaomi Phone 2 has the same internals as the Xperia Z, Nexus 4, Optimus G, Droid DNA, probably the M7 and has a 4.3 720 p display for $299 and people still complain that Android doesn't have any smaller high end phones.
When Samsung does introduce the GS4 mini with the same internals as the GS4 with a 4 inch 720 p instead of a 5 inch 1080p display, they need to educate the Android consumers that it is pretty much just as high end. They both scale to be about the same, meaning if you blow up that 720p 4 inch screen to 5 inches, it would be the equivalent to the 5 inch 1080p or pretty close at least.
And customers need to understand that the GS4 mini will probably perform better if they have the same internals because it would push less pixels. In theory, they could actually lower the internals in the GS4 mini and it would perform just as good as the main GS4 since the mini would push less pixels, it doesn't need the same internals. That is how Apple does it. When the screen size is small, you can design a high end screen that is less than 720p.
It is similar to a car versus a truck. The truck will have a more powerful engine because it needs to push the extra weight. That doesn't mean the car is lower end or lesser though.
62. maxican16 (Posts: 364; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)
Whoa.. text wall.
I'm referring to the min they already make... with lesser internals.
61. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Hmmm. The S4 pro is probably good enough for the GS4 mini though since it only has to push 720p or less. It would be the fastest phone if it had a similar resolution to the iphone 5.
Maybe this is the GS4 mini and they mistakenly listed the 1080 p resolution. Otherwise, I see no reason to use the S4 pro for their flagship. With Sony and HTC, they have no choice. It is either S4 pro, Tegra 4, or delay the Xperia Z/M7 until the Qualcomm 600/800 comes out. Samsung must have more choices than a S4 pro, I hope.
74. bigstrudel (Posts: 518; Member since: 20 Aug 2012)
The S4 Pro is more than powerful enough to run a 1080p tablet lag free.
103. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)
Not from what I have seen. The Nexus 4 runs much better than the 1080p phones to me.
69. AshishRomea (Posts: 145; Member since: 09 Aug 2012)
Still Xperia Z has advantage overall and not forgetting the fact that Z has out performed Nexus 4 :P lets wait for S4 whtever though
70. bigstrudel (Posts: 518; Member since: 20 Aug 2012)
Who cares if its using a Snapdragon or not. Im using an S4 Pro device as we speak and it NEVER lags or stutters and runs any game at 100% with no hiccups and executes tasks instantly.
The hardware race is dead boys and girls. If there is no difference in day to day use; then who cares about benchmark scores. All that matters at this point is improving battery life.
73. Android4u (Posts: 456; Member since: 16 Aug 2012)
I agree...I don't care what everybody else says, the s4 pro is a beast.
90. alexzibrit (Posts: 67; Member since: 15 Jan 2013)
Yeah But Samsung phones are known to have a slight lag with Snapdragons take The S3 and S2 for instance, Samsung's Exynos Processors are truly optimized for use with their phones, so I don't need the octo-core, but I do want an Exynos (notice I said "slight", it's only noticeable if you compare it to a phone using an Exynos processor other than that it runs superbly )
97. bigstrudel (Posts: 518; Member since: 20 Aug 2012)
Im using an Optimus G which runs the S4 Pro of course and LG's custom skin. The processor was not specifically tailored for this UI; but it still runs 100% stutter and lag free.
To sum it up simply: The S4 Pro runs Android 100% lag free regardless of the skin.
93. Androidaholic (Posts: 4; Member since: 10 Jun 2012)
The real Galaxy S4 is going to have a Intel core I-7 the new mobile version !
108. kobainez (Posts: 427; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
Xperia Z benchmark is much better than this and droid dna. U Sams**t samdung fans go check other websites abt xperia Z screen and camera. Its excellent according to them. Those bad screen probably prototype not retail version so quit bitching abt it. Iphone arena is full of Samdung and iphone fans and it made me sick. Sure ill gt thumbs down from samdung fans
110. BitterTruth (unregistered)
HTC One will destroy it :)