Pricing for some of Verizon's upcoming smartphones is leaked
0. phoneArena posted on 14 Apr 2011, 00:11
With the HTC ThunderBolt being out for a few weeks now, it seems that it will be getting some company soon from the Samsung Droid Charge, HTC Droid Incredible 2, LG Revolution, and Motorola DROID X 2. The Samsung Droid Charge (SCH-i510) is the official name of the "un-named Samsung 4G smartphone" we first saw at CES earlier this year. The device is expected to carry a minimum advertised price of $299.99
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. bossmt_2 posted on 14 Apr 2011, 01:53 2 1
Apple needs to make a LTE iPHone now for 199 so others stop overcharging for LTE. THere's minimal differences between the Fascinate and the charge. If you're gonna charge 300 bucks at least make it a dual core processor.
2. ns899078 (unregistered) posted on 14 Apr 2011, 07:26 2 2
really, what world are you living in? Since when would Apple help bring down prices? If they put out a 4G anytime soon it's going to be closer to $400 than $200.
5. testman22 posted on 14 Apr 2011, 09:38 1 1
actually apple has been very competitive price wise in the mobile market
18. bossmt_2 posted on 14 Apr 2011, 16:16 0 0
You must not have looked at smart phone prices pre-iPhone, and even post iPhone. I remember when Verizon sold the Treo 700W for 400 bucks on a 2 year contracts. Apple is really good at pricing themselves in the upper range of buyer budget constraints.
9. jogutier posted on 14 Apr 2011, 10:53 1 0
Where's the Bionic? I wonder if this means it isn't coming out for a while. O' well, I'm still content with my Thunderbolt. :)
3. roldefol posted on 14 Apr 2011, 08:19 1 1
I don't see the point of selling four nearly identical phones at the $250-300 price point. If I were Verizon, I'd start the Revolution at $200, the Bolt and Charge at $250, and the Bionic at $300. Then in a few months, across the board $50 price drop.
4. droidxhtc (unregistered) posted on 14 Apr 2011, 09:15 1 1
Come on $299 for a Samsung Charge. Get Real Samsung! Remember the Galaxy S Tab came out at $599 also and is now $199 six months later. When Samsung updates the phones they put out vice keeping them on Android 2.1 and earlier is when I will even begin to look at them and at $299, I don't think so.
6. blaze456 posted on 14 Apr 2011, 10:31 2 1
wish one of them had a keyboard..they are all pretty much the same..just differnt manufacters
8. knuckleballer34 posted on 14 Apr 2011, 10:41 0 0
Spot on. It would be nice if Verizon would make LTE offerings with different size screens, 4 or 3.7 inches to start. The holdup may be on the manufacturers end, who knows.
10. jogutier posted on 14 Apr 2011, 10:54 1 0
I can barely surf the net with a 4.3 let alone a 3.7. :(
12. roldefol posted on 14 Apr 2011, 11:01 0 0
Then get a small tablet. This steady stream of giant phones baffles me. What happened to the days when a cel phone was something you could slip in your jeans pocket?
15. knuckleballer34 posted on 14 Apr 2011, 11:21 0 0
I'm the same way; after I switched to the Droid X, I wonder how I ever made it with a 3.2 inch screen. But 4.3 inches is cumbersome for a lot of people who have smaller hands, and Verizon is practically shunning a market segment by not offering LTE phones that are a bit smaller.
11. asdf (unregistered) posted on 14 Apr 2011, 10:58 1 0
it isn't the manufacturers' faults. it's Verizon and the idiot in charge of approving what phones they hold available.
HTC has the Evo, Evo Shift, and now the Evo 3D on the way. they also have the WP7 Pro out so the diversity is there. same with LG and their Optimus 2x and Optimus 3D lines. Motorola with the Atrix 4G, etc...
how Verizon only has a 1ghz single core processor with a 4.3 " screeen for each manufacturer is beyond mind numbing. it's like they think LTE is a big selling point and no other companies are doing 4G yet. on top of that, they're still releasing phone with no 4G. (DINC2 and DX2). i mean what's the point?
13. roldefol posted on 14 Apr 2011, 11:07 0 0
It's as if Verizon said "we need an LTE phone the size of the EVO" and then accepted every manufacturer's proposal. There must be something about the LTE radio and antenna (or combination of CDMA with LTE) that forces them all into a similar large body.
I think a company like LG would have been better off making a compact, affordable LTE phone like the Optimus/Vortex. The Revolution will just get lost in the shuffle.
16. knuckleballer34 posted on 14 Apr 2011, 11:23 0 0
I was wondering the same thing earlier; are all of the LTE phones this large because the manufacturers are not yet able to cram all of the radios and antennas into a smaller package? It does seem sort of awkward.
17. roldefol posted on 14 Apr 2011, 12:50 0 0
Well, it would explain why phones like the Incredible 2, Droid 3, X2 and (gasp) iPhone 5 will not be LTE. People here treat it like a bad marketing decision when in fact the technology might just not be capable of fitting into a slim device yet.
14. mindmax posted on 14 Apr 2011, 11:16 0 0
KEYBOARD please. I agree. I want to ditch my Blackberry for a LTE phone but want to go to a keyboard phone.
7. knuckleballer34 posted on 14 Apr 2011, 10:39 0 1
I'm disappointed--and somewhat surprised--that the Droid X2 won't come with LTE capability. At the least, it would be nice if the X2 was a global roaming phone like the Incredible 2. Verizon would sell a ton of X2's with either capability. Let's hope the X2 is at least dual core!
I like that Verizon is quickly diversifying their offerings for LTE phones; they may be more or less be roughly the same, but at least consumers have a few subtle differences to choose from, primarily manufacturer. I can't see too many customers buying the Samsung Charge though; not while the Thunderbolt is priced for less.