x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






PhoneArena Awards 2013: Best cameraphones

0. phoneArena 03 Dec 2013, 11:01 posted on

Gone are the days when phones were good only for making calls and sending text messages. Today's top models can give us driving directions, play movies, run complex applications, and most importantly, capture photos and videos. In fact, cameraphones have evolved so much that many people don't bother carrying a dedicated point-and-shoot camera with them anymore, relying solely on their mobile device for snapping shots. That's why we absolutely had to include a category in our PhoneArena Awards dedicated to the year's best cameraphones...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 15:49

120. darkkjedii (Posts: 22155; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


Mmm hmmm lol

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 16:43

129. rodneyej1 (Posts: 3576; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)


The iPhone isn't a piece of shiznit, but it doesn't have the third best camera.. So, PA is saying the 5s's camera is better than the 1520's❔ Not likely.. And lets remember this competition is for the best camera, the camera that turns out the best end result... Not the camera that's easiest to use to get good pictures.. It's all about extraordinary pictures for a smartphone, not above average pictures.. The iPhone is only above average, therefore it doesn't belong in a competition in a time where we are getting close to DSLR type quality from advanced camera phones...
That's the whole point, period, point blank❕❕ No more needs to be said❗❗

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 18:15

136. darkkjedii (Posts: 22155; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


Drugs are bad mmm'k. In my Mr. Mackey voice.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 11:48 1

31. Long1 (banned) (Posts: 399; Member since: 18 May 2013)


I remember how all the tech media called Lumia 1020 before the release, "THE ANSWER to Galaxy S4 ZOOM."
But now in the CAMERAPHONE article they conveniently missed Galaxy S4 ZOOM .
Why? Of course- not to give the crown to Samsung again.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 11:55 3

38. alltechinside (Posts: 248; Member since: 21 Apr 2013)


Or it's not the best cameraphone?

Regarding your post on "Why? Of course- not to give the crown to Samsung again."
And you conveniently missed the Note III part....

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:53

112. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


GS4Z is plain sh*t.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 12:01 1

42. KillerKeyboard (Posts: 344; Member since: 21 Nov 2013)


The 3 phones up there...
WP vs Android vs iOS

I mean no offense, but imo, Z1 should represent Android.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 12:02 4

43. good2great (Posts: 1042; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)


this is an OUTRAGE! *mumble mumble mumble grumble*

hahaha this site is awesome! so many hurt butts.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 12:05 1

47. proto (Posts: 59; Member since: 12 Sep 2012)


well after update i think Z1 and lg g2 have better camera then note 3 and iphone 5s

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 12:13 4

50. zekes (Posts: 229; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)


I notice almost everybody on this website hates on the iPhone and the iPad now eventually when you grow up you realize that without the iPad and iPhone which plays a big role in the mobile industry they are the gold standard in their segments yeah android may be advanced in most areas but without these two products Android would probably be competing with BlackBerry which means it probably wouldn't be as advanced

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 12:17 1

52. androiphone20 (Posts: 1654; Member since: 10 Jul 2013)


+1 this place is packed with ihaters

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 13:03 4

60. Whateverman (Posts: 3271; Member since: 17 May 2009)


You can look at it that way, or you can look at it as people just getting tired of seeing the last advanced phone in just about every aspect, winning awards just because it's an Apple product. If there were simplest or fastest awards... Yep, that should be the iphone. But it should be listed in the top 3 for cameras, let's be real.

Nokia alone has 3 phone that are better than the iPhone. No matter what they did in the past, they need to be held to a higher standard than what they were 4 years ago. But I'm sure they'll [Apple will] place in every last one of the remaining awards. iPhonearena.com is on a roll and I can't see them stopping anytime soon.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 13:35 1

75. zekes (Posts: 229; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)


Whatever man I didn't ask that question I didn't ask what phone was more advanced iPhone is still the gold standard whether you enjoy fanboys like it or not and if you don't believe me the iPhone is setting many trends don't believe me HTC one fingerprint scanner which isn't doing well Samsung is going to move the 64-bit processor even though android in no way supports it yes there were gold phones back in the day now there are even more since the champagne colored iPhone should we say project butter Android wanted their system to be as smooth as possible by the way which is great for the consumer as the iPhone should we say no SD card support come on I can go on and on if you want me to tell u how the iPhone and iOS is a system is more I can get 50 facts of how the iPhone is more superior than android as a whole

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 13:45 2

76. JerryTime (Posts: 468; Member since: 09 Nov 2013)


The lack on any type of HD support for your screen brings your advanced argument to a screeching halt.

Dedicated LTE Antenna?

Decent service in general especially in low reception areas?

Battery Life?

"Most advanced OS" finally adding features that Android has had for years and causing widespread issues?

True Multitasking?

Countless Camera Features that other phones offer that the iPhone still does not?

Active Notifications?

Better than 8MP camera?

Get real man.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 13:53 1

79. zekes (Posts: 229; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)


Okay here we go again you do realize that LTE is hardware so that is excluded you do realize that battery life this phone D pendant so that is excluded you do realize that there are apps on the app store for the camera so that argument is excluded active notifications is on one phone only that argument is excluded The argument about the service provider stuff that's excluded Chew multitasking that's also excluded the true multitask as I Symbio and webOS argument excluded The most advanced OS solely depends on the user argument excluded I know phones with five megapixels to do a damn pretty good job argument excluded iOS supports HD screens As on the iPad of course argument excluded and basically the foundation which is OS X which has been in development since 1997. So iOS has a pretty good strong foundation android doesn't and on top of that Apple Built their systems from the ground up Google on the other hand bought there operating system if you're going to troll at least have intelligence

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 13:57 1

81. JerryTime (Posts: 468; Member since: 09 Nov 2013)


Dude have you ever heard of a punctuation? Clean that up, so its legible and I'll fight this "battle" with you.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:06

86. androiphone20 (Posts: 1654; Member since: 10 Jul 2013)


it's not really a battle is it, going about the same logical argument. You got all of that and you just won't admit to it

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 18:32 2

137. Whateverman (Posts: 3271; Member since: 17 May 2009)


There's no doubt the iPhone is a trend setter, but a 64bit processor and gold color don't warrant giving Apple third place for camera design. There's nothing superior about the iPhone except for maybe the game play, and the Nexus 5 is right there with it.

Let's face it, the iPhone has no HD, no SD, no NFC, a small screen, a closed system, no customization, and the pastel colors just killed what little masculinity it had before iOS 7. I don't think it's a bad phone, but it's an inferior product wrapped in high quality materials.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 13:48 2

77. JerryTime (Posts: 468; Member since: 09 Nov 2013)


Well said Whateverman. I agree.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:02

83. zekes (Posts: 229; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)


All the stuff that you named was kind of irrelevant and the stuff about the service provider makes me think your little slow

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:08 1

91. zekes (Posts: 229; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)


By the way iOS can talk directly to the hardware Android cannot do that reason why Java's a big roadblock why you think they're switching to the new runtime

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:14 2

94. JerryTime (Posts: 468; Member since: 09 Nov 2013)


I'm the "slow" one, but you can't even write a grammatically correct sentence.

It's YOU'RE

But I'll take your advice on anything you present me. I'm done.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:16

95. zekes (Posts: 229; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)


Okay smart guy tell me how android is so superior besides marketshare and hardware don't worry I'll wait. Lol. In my cat Williams voice

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:41 1

107. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


Having support for full HD screen in one. What's the point of recording a video in full 1080P if you can only watch it on a 640p screen? iPads are the exception.

There goes one for you.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:47

109. zekes (Posts: 229; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)


THAT doesn't make any sense whatsoever read between the lines before you speak IOS supports multiple resolutions are we clear one of them is well beyond 1080 P are we still clear

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:50 4

111. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


I think you need to read again. I clearly mentioned iPads were an exception. 640P displaying playing a 1080P video lol. Makes sense right?

Damn, it's funny because I'm typing this while watching a video on YouTube. Can an iOS device do that? Here, let me save you the time - NO.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 15:00 1

113. zekes (Posts: 229; Member since: 14 Aug 2012)


You do realize that Apple TV is running a modified version of iOS right. So your argument is still invalid either way you slice to steak

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 19:32

140. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)


In reference to the latest iPhone flagship, my statement clearly stands, so no it's not invalidated sorry.

640p screen in 2013... Lol.

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:17

98. androiphone20 (Posts: 1654; Member since: 10 Jul 2013)


dodging the facts, niceee

posted on 03 Dec 2013, 14:22 1

99. androiphone20 (Posts: 1654; Member since: 10 Jul 2013)


@Jerrytime wait, that's it???

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories