PhoneArena Awards 2012: Best Phone
0. phoneArena posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:04
Cue the drum roll, pop the champagne, and throw the confetti up in the air! Get ready for the grand finale in our PhoneArena Awards of 2012 series because today we are announcing the year's best phone. And as you might expect, the winner in today's category is a smartphone - a smartphone that is great in many ways, which is why it truly deserves to be honored...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
63. WakaFlakaD posted on 17 Dec 2012, 13:12 0 0
Mind to share your thoughts on your statement?
74. zuckerboy posted on 17 Dec 2012, 13:30 0 0
should I buy lumia 920 or ip5 ? I am going to buy phone but I am confused please help me
94. zuckerboy posted on 17 Dec 2012, 14:16 1 1
thx but lack of app on wp plartfom worries me :(
97. gazmatic posted on 17 Dec 2012, 14:22 1 0
go to nokia's beta page xyo.net for all the apps your heart desires
104. zuckerboy posted on 17 Dec 2012, 14:48 0 0
I have never seen that page I'll take a look dude
119. Lboogey6 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 16:30 4 1
why would android be completely out of the picture ?
150. iDroidWin posted on 18 Dec 2012, 01:41 0 1
If you are coming from feature Phone, WP 8 will do. It takes time for you to get into ecosystem. Basic apps are there or will be there. If from Android (as I see you aren't even considering it), I will say ip5. But imo, its a trade down. If you haven't given android any thought, you should.
107. nooraldeen posted on 17 Dec 2012, 14:55 4 3
Lumia 920. And the apps it just need more time maybe 2 or 3 months and it will get alot of apps. Having a phone that lacks apps is better than a phone that lacks almost everything
111. zuckerboy posted on 17 Dec 2012, 15:07 2 1
Yes 920 has great screen and very fast phone red os very sexy
6. PapaSmurf posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:12 7 4
Nexus 4 deserves it spot as #1. If anyone disagrees, they don't know how to get the best bang for their buck.
128. jan25 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 17:50 1 2
exaggerate much? the new kernel is to blame and there has been known people to reach over 5+ hours of battery life with franco kernel. it won't be long until Google fix it with an update.
135. bucky posted on 17 Dec 2012, 21:08 0 0
I'm not exaggerating at all. I had the phone and its a great phone but the battery makes it almost useless. Add a 3 hour charging time to that too.
I shouldn't have to do the work to make a $400 phome last me past 3pm
7. pkiran1996 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:12 6 3
Would've thought the Note 2 would be included instead and beat DNA. DNA may have the most amazing screen ever but I'd rather have the features the S-Pen delivers which makes use of the huge screen
9. kadalil posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:13 19 2
seriously????? how's the iphone 5 2nd on this list? the s3 and 920 trumps it hands down.
14. PapaSmurf posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:16 4 2
That's what I'm saying... Difference between 4S and 5 is the processor and screen size. Yes it's the fastest out there, but other than that, there's isn't that much a difference.
13. akishakoi posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:16 13 1
the criteria and the ranking is contradicting. Nexus 4 got first place for price-to-performance factor and I don't argue with that, then how come iPhone5 bagged the 2nd place? its price-to-performance ratio will fall below negative. Lols
15. IliyaBeshkov posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:16 6 1
"Nokia Lumia 920: Last but not least, the smartphone comes in a wide variety of flashy colors, unlike the devices we listed above."
The SIII have many colors too(blue,white,grey,brown,black,red)!!
26. rafabr posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:23 5 1
Yeah that was a really bad argument. They should have mentioned the wireless charging capabilities instead of colors, or the super fast screen.
72. JWill97 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 13:26 1 8
you definitely don't know anything about screen. it's just Nokia's marketing gimmick. Lumia 920 has 8ms respond time, while GS3 has 0.01ms respond time (all AMOLED displays are the same), One X's screen has 2ms respond time
132. -box- posted on 17 Dec 2012, 19:01 2 1
Yeah, no. 1) the 920 isn't AMOLED. The 820/22/10 is, but not the 920. 2) the 920 (to my knowledge) has the fastest widely-available screen in the industry.
146. JWill97 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 00:53 0 1
fastest screen is measured by the responds time. then how can you say 8ms is faster than 0.01ms? I got 1-5, so many Nokia fanshere
151. neutralguy posted on 18 Dec 2012, 01:46 0 0
actually, i think it's not about the response time but about the "rendering speed" of the display. Just a thought. Response time is different from rendering speed. :) or maybe I'm wrong :)
187. EasycapExpertti posted on 20 Dec 2012, 06:03 1 0
Nokia Lumia 920 has the best screen - 2.4x faster than Samsung S3's screen and 5.4x faster than iPhone 5's screen (tested with Lagom test). You can use its screen with gloves on. It's the first smartphone in the world to deliver a full 60 frames-per-second (FPS) without any blurring.
36. akishakoi posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:27 7 4
he said "Flashy colors" (ex. cyan, yellow, bright red). S3's colors were dull and earthly
50. pkiran1996 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:50 3 0
Well they are trying to represent the natural world...hence the 'Nature UX' and pebble shape.
145. neutralguy posted on 18 Dec 2012, 00:32 2 0
akishakoi is correct. Flashy=eye catching=vibrant colors.
They shouldn't have mentioned "flashy" if all they want to point out was the variety of colors to choose from.
People, stop arguing with such thing.
16. gwuhua1984 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:16 4 2
Hm... iPhone 5 is a good phone... but it's not the best phone... It really should be taken off the list and replaced with Galaxy Note 2.
And guys... these phones aren't in any particular order... otherwise it'll be numbered.
25. g2a5b0e posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:22 2 1
It seems to me that it is in order. Read the notes under the Google Nexus 4. They clearly call it #1.
39. gwuhua1984 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:29 2 1
Yeah, I saw that, I thought that didn't mean too much. If that's the case... iPhone 5 should definitely be lower on that list if it even deserved to stay on there at all.
46. mahmoodh posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:35 0 0
it is numbered. read the description for nexus 4 and lumia 920, they call it first and last respectively.
20. PhoneArenaUser posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:18 2 1
I would write some nice words about bias but at the moment I'm a bit busy so I just won't write anything...
22. diego21197 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:19 4 1
how in the world the droid dna beat out the s3, when the s3 is the most popular android phone and we all know how much units it has sold, when the droid Dna has a lot more flaws, like the storage and the power button and it's only available in Verizon, estupid people
23. TheCynicalTechie posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:19 5 1
I like the Nexus 4, but it is hardly the best phone. It has a glass, fragile, back, no LTE, 16GB storage with no micro SD, and the camera is meh. I would have put the Galaxy Note 2 first, but I am not making the list.
28. PapaSmurf posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:23 0 1
$300 for a 1.5GHz quad-core processor, beautiful design, pure vanilla Android, best 720p screen out there isn't enough to make it the best?
And if you haven't been on XDA recently, you can toggle LTE on the phone, only in the most populated markets with AT&T.
38. TheCynicalTechie posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:28 0 1
The price is great, but this is the best, not the most economical. Also, to even suggest an 8GB phone without a microSD card slot is complete lunacy. It is only useable at $349. The Galaxy Note 2 should be #1, and the Nexus 4 should be put at #2.
109. nooraldeen posted on 17 Dec 2012, 15:02 2 1
How is the nexus 4 has the best 720 display?!!.the best 720 display is the Lumia 920
136. No_Nonsense posted on 17 Dec 2012, 21:20 1 0
That's a 768p display.
153. nooraldeen posted on 18 Dec 2012, 02:03 0 0
174. Zero0 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 20:10 0 0
LTE is, in practice, probably little more than a buzzword. T-Mobile's HSPA+ is consistently pulling 10Mbps down, at least. And this is in a 21Mbps market, not a 42Mbps market. Granted, AT&T's LTE speeds demolish that, and Verizon's are a bit higher, but it is not often that I need much more than 10Mbps on a phone. And yes, faster is better, but after a certain point, it makes little difference.
I wouldn't call the camera "meh," either. It's not the Lumia 920, but it's good.
Glass back and storage I'll give you, but (at least the way I run things), both are non-issues for me.
And the software. Stock 4.2 is fan-freaking-tastic. And when the Nexus 4 gets 5.0 months before just about everything else, that's when the Nexus will really shine.
218. TheCynicalTechie posted on 12 Jan 2013, 15:52 0 0
I am not denying it is a good phone, just not the best phone.
27. Insignificant posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:23 2 3
I'm not going to even bother mention the Xperia T, iPhoneArena strikes again.
30. PapaSmurf posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:25 6 1
To be honest, I don't think the Xperia T deserves to be up there...
59. Insignificant posted on 17 Dec 2012, 13:01 0 1
Why not? Fine, the TX then. An amazing screen, design, fast capture camera (which is pretty cool), small apps, BE (which does help, you can check).
29. akishakoi posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:24 15 3
Criteria: price-to-performance ratio: Winner = Nexus 4
Criteria: price-to-number of innovations ratio: Winner = Lumia 920
Criteria: price-to-number of issues ratio: Winner = iPhone 5
34. ultimatebatman posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:26 9 1
This list is very wrong. In YOUR OWN COMPARISONS the GSIII beat almost every phone except the DNA. You guys need to get your heads on straight.
44. akishakoi posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:32 3 10
i disagree. It's famous because it's android, with a huge screen, and thin body. other than that, it's easily trampled by the Lumia 920's set of features and innovations. And with its durable and rigid tank-like body, it literally crushes the rest on the list.
49. parkwaydr posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:49 4 2
I'm sorry but the only thing innovative about the 920 is the camera. There's nothing new about the phone design itself and windows phone hasn't done anything that no other os hasn't or can't already do.I'm not saying its a bad phone, because it isn't at all, its just not a game changer. Besides what ultimatebatman was trying to say is that p.a rated the gs111 higher against all these phones except the DNA when they did head to head comparisons
68. JWill97 posted on 17 Dec 2012, 13:17 1 4
set of features and innovation? lol
can you mention what unique feature it has? nothing
the most innovative phone this year is Note 2. but the best phone is DNA. Lumia 920 isn't that impressive actually
92. akishakoi posted on 17 Dec 2012, 14:06 6 3
1. L920 has true OIS, GS3 none (only digital algorithm)
2. can you use any other object, aside from your finger, to operate the screen of your GS3? No!
3. Pure Motion HD+ screen has faster refresh rate than any other phones out there.
4. L920 has wireless charging, GS3 none.
5. can you drop, smash with a mallet, use as a hammer, drive over your GS3 and expect it to work still? NO!
Now before you say "there's nothing new about this phone" do a little research first because by far, only the Lumia 920 delivered a lot of "FIRSTS" among all these phones listed.
So what's new with your GS3? meh
147. JWill97 posted on 18 Dec 2012, 01:06 0 1
I can use it using my clothes, or tissue. Yes it has the fastest refresh rate, but GS3 has a far better respond time. use it as a hammer? the screen right? why not? GS3 has Gorilla Glass 2, it won't break by that kind of thing. I'm pretty sure my comment will get a bad rate but that's okay. Btw, can't you read what I wrote up there? It's Galaxy Note 2. Not GS3
you want to argue more? than talk about software also. who felivered the best and most complete features on smartphone? Galaxy S3, and now Galaxy Note 2. Lumia features are nowhere near Samsung. Use your mind to argue with me next time
161. akishakoi posted on 18 Dec 2012, 05:32 1 2
My reply was meant for you and parkwaydr (more for parkwaydr). I did notice that you mentioned Note2 but its no different to GS3. they absolutely look the same, only larger (pun intended). So my comment is still applicable for both devices. And we all know samsung devices are nowhere near the level of durability of Nokia's. And as I mentioned with my other comment, sticking to the criteria of awarding the best "phone", it is unfair to belittle the L920 just because it runs on WP8. If you give more emphasis on the software then perhaps let's change the award to the best "software/OS". I believe no one can argue that if we strip all phones with their OS and software, leaving them with just the hardware, material, built, quality and innovation, the L920 may be the one that has more. And this should be the basis for the award. And mind you, WP8 is catching up, but even without it, Nokia had tons of features squeezed into that phone that other WP8 or android or iphone devices don't have.
So if you were asking me if I argue with you more, I wanna throw that back to you. Coz I'm clearly using my mind with my arguments. I don't know about you.
175. parkwaydr posted on 18 Dec 2012, 22:21 0 0
OK I'll put it this way....what can I get from the 920 that I couldn't get from any other windows phone?
219. Bilpocalypse posted on 12 Jan 2013, 16:03 0 0
Actually, both have a 60 megahertz refresh rate. The Lumia has a better response time (this means the screen can better keep up with the refresh rate than the gs3... or the note II).