x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

PhoneArena Awards 2012: Best Phone

0. phoneArena 17 Dec 2012, 12:04 posted on

Cue the drum roll, pop the champagne, and throw the confetti up in the air! Get ready for the grand finale in our PhoneArena Awards of 2012 series because today we are announcing the year's best phone. And as you might expect, the winner in today's category is a smartphone - a smartphone that is great in many ways, which is why it truly deserves to be honored...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:07 21

1. Captain_Doug (Posts: 997; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)

huh, DNA beat out S3? I like the DNA more but it seems like the S3 would've gotten the nod.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:12 33

5. dsDoan (Posts: 229; Member since: 28 Dec 2011)

I have a GS3 myself, but I don't see anything about it that is better than the DNA. Whereas, the DNA has a few impressive hardware advantages over the GS3.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:13 52

8. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)

Released 6 months after the Galaxy S3, it SHOULD have better specs.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:31 16

42. dsDoan (Posts: 229; Member since: 28 Dec 2011)

Which device was released first doesn't matter. This list covers all devices released in 2012.

What matters is which device has the best specs today.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 14:48 7

105. Sailingmaster (Posts: 24; Member since: 26 Feb 2012)

By that logic, no one should release a phone before November if they want a shot at winning a Phone of the Year award (and the trendy sales that come with it)...

posted on 10 Apr 2013, 07:31

222. TeritorialDemon (Posts: 20; Member since: 20 Oct 2012)

I agree with you. They should take this statement into consideration. Other than that, love the article!

posted on 22 Dec 2012, 10:30 3

198. Abbath (Posts: 99; Member since: 16 Sep 2012)

if that is the case then where is the Note 2?!? It has many impressive features and is faster than the SGS 3...Huge *removable* Battery, Expandable storage, very useful features along with the stylus,

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 22:33 9

138. Nadr1212 (Posts: 741; Member since: 22 Sep 2012)


1.Y is the Google Nexus 4 & IPhone 5. I question this cuz they seem sucky to me

2.And where the fudge is the GN ll?!?

posted on 19 Dec 2012, 12:03 1

181. iDroid8 (Posts: 155; Member since: 16 Oct 2012)

PA puts that in category of phablets, hence GS3 takes its place

posted on 23 Dec 2012, 12:10 1

199. Bilpocalypse (Posts: 301; Member since: 13 Oct 2012)

Agreed. Where is the Note II? Or, as I like to call it, the GS3 on roids.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:14 27

10. abdane (Posts: 494; Member since: 07 Oct 2011)

GS3 better battery, GS3 removable battery, GS3 sd card slot, GS3 have andorid true multitasking ( HTC removed it because sense lags ) Samsung > HTC

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:18 8

21. gwuhua1984 (Posts: 1237; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)

You're talking about the One X... Altho I'm not sure if it's the same with DNA.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:26 4

32. dsDoan (Posts: 229; Member since: 28 Dec 2011)

Are you really calling 2100 mAh a victory over a 2020 mAh battery? You won't notice a difference in battery life based on that minuscule battery size difference.

Removable battery and SD card are not features that the masses care about.

Every Android device has the same multitasking capabilities. Any launcher could add the same Samsung feature that you are referring to.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:32 9

43. doubler86 (Posts: 320; Member since: 26 Jan 2011)

I go to Verizon stores every day and they say that customers always don't buy the DNA because of the fact that it doesn't have removable battery and sd card slot. That is expected with Android.

As far as battery life goes, without rooting and keeping them stock, Samsung does a much better job with power management compared to HTC. I've tested out both phones and the S3 gets about 2 to 3 more hours on the same settings, but if you put samsung's power saving mode which slows down the processor when you're not using it, it out last the DNA by closer to 4 hours

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:44 2

47. dsDoan (Posts: 229; Member since: 28 Dec 2011)

I call bollocks on that first statement. Your mainstream consumer is not going to buy a phone based on whether it has an SD card or not. Your or me? Sure, we might. But we're not the average consumer.

I wasn't referring to battery life. The GS3 may well get better battery life. I was referring the to the mundane difference in battery size.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 14:51 3

106. Sailingmaster (Posts: 24; Member since: 26 Feb 2012)

"Removable battery and SD card are not features that the masses care about."

You really need to support that with some documentation. My agents gets calls for phone recommendations and the vast majority of them drop interest in the DNA as soon as my agents go over the lack of MicroSD card support or non-removable battery while discussing features.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 15:38

114. Lboogey6 (Posts: 281; Member since: 31 Jan 2012)

I shouldn't have to add a launcher but this is crazy feature wise what does the dna do a big bright screen big deal tv's have gotten bigger and brighter guess what sales declined they made smart tv's more functionality

posted on 18 Dec 2012, 03:34 6

156. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)

You obviously have no idea on what you talk about.

Oh and if you ever get the chance, try putting this on the DNA:
-1GB of music
-1GB of photos
-1GB of videos
- One full HD movie

..and you'll be left with only about 4GB for apps!
Not even enough for two high end games!

posted on 21 Dec 2012, 20:20

195. gelo0291 (Posts: 16; Member since: 06 Nov 2012)

then buy an HTC J Butterfly instead

posted on 18 Dec 2012, 06:28

164. AamirSIII (banned) (Posts: 187; Member since: 04 Oct 2012)

u really out of masses man cause most of the people use android because of very easy file sharing unlike iOS and thats the reason u can download Full HD movies and vids of even higher resolution(like for Nexus 10) and then easily transfer them to either their device via computer or transfer them to their microSD cards and then put em in the device... i myself have 2 64GB cards for my data use... i no longer use USB cause i can take any of my office or personal data on to my tablet or mobile and take that anywhere i want!
THATS the use of microSD cards for masses u dumb ass....

posted on 20 Dec 2012, 21:09

191. metalpoet (unregistered)

My main selling point for most Android phones that my company offers is that they have expandable memory and removable battery compared to a locked down device like the iPhone.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:28 1

37. true1984 (Posts: 823; Member since: 23 May 2012)

only the verizon version doesnt have an sd card slot

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:30 3

41. gwuhua1984 (Posts: 1237; Member since: 06 Mar 2012)

The DNA is the Verizon version. If they're talking about the international version, then they should be calling it HTC Butterfly.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 12:53 2

53. amiroo (Posts: 269; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)

ooo!! my friend htc butterfly have a sd card..its also water resistance..its better if there was butterfly till dna..
butterfly is powerfull in all the way..its not important if s3 s battary is better than dna with only 1 hour higher scores..
instead of full hd display, more power & better performance ,better design & build quality & beat audio & better ui are advanteges dna against s3..

posted on 18 Dec 2012, 15:51

169. htc_prep (Posts: 303; Member since: 09 Oct 2009)

Better is all in the eyes of the beholder I have both the s3 and evo 4g lte. Both sprint. Both rooted. Both stock ROM with respective skins removed ( as in the Rosie and twlaunch apk files removed through root explorer). Apex launcher. same apps on each phone. I track the battery with juice plotter and I can honestly say they have pretty equal battery life with my evo lte lasting longer In stand by and standard cellular use. And both die in 4-5 hours under heavy use.

I don't pull my battery that often so remove able doesn't matter.

And my ego has 16 gigs internal with a hot swap capable SD slot.

Each phone and oems devices have pros and cons

But to say Samsung > HTC is a matter of opinion and jot facts.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 13:14 7

64. AamirSIII (banned) (Posts: 187; Member since: 04 Oct 2012)

what about the better camera? what about the brighter screen? what about the Super AMOLED? what about the nature UI? what about the expandable memory??? what about lighter weight?what about its slimness?what about USB ON_THE_GO?? what about MHL port connectivity?what about the better Video recording?how about being future proof? how about quadcore processor?how about FM radio with recording? how about choices of colors? how about better browsing cause of better Java engine? how about future updates? how about Resale value? how about S-Voice? how about better and more diversified video and audio Codecs? how about document viewer and editor? how about 50Gb of Free Dropbox space? how about Active-Noise Cancellation with dedicated mic?
I can go on and on DNA is a good phone but as a matter of fact DNA is NOT AT ALL BETTER THAN S3!
no matter u take me as a fanboy or something or what PA or you or any one else say, S3 is the best phone! EVER!

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 13:39 3

81. dsDoan (Posts: 229; Member since: 28 Dec 2011)

When I saw you using things like MHL, USB On-the-Go, and noise-cancelling mic as your supporting arguments, I decided not to give a full reply. These, and other features you mentioned, are implemented on both the Galaxy S3 and the Droid DNA.

If you're going to attempt a condescendingly ranting argument, be sure to do your research first.

Both are great devices, but neither one dominates the other as you seem to think.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 16:40 3

120. AamirSIII (banned) (Posts: 187; Member since: 04 Oct 2012)

lol dude i just mentioned all the features that are in REALITY the true difference between S3 and DNA! as i have already said, no matter what u say S3 is better!

and btw, just check the comparison done by phonearena itself and u would come to know.
i didnt say DNA is bad, i just said S3 is better and it will remain better for some time...
and its not ONLY about implementation of the features, its about their sound execution with the software which, DNA just could not being HTC device.
its camera is worst, smaller battery, HTC Sense Hiccups, non removable battery and most of all, No expandable memory!
these features are NOT available in DNA!

not gonna reply u any more cause just found how dumb u are...!

posted on 21 Dec 2012, 20:21 2

196. gelo0291 (Posts: 16; Member since: 06 Nov 2012)

F*ck you bitch.

posted on 17 Dec 2012, 13:16 1

67. tedkord (Posts: 11925; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)

Personal preference. Where the SGS3 wins for me is in the replaceable battery and microsd slot. Those are must haves for me. (Though I'd forego the battery if it had a 3500 or more built in)

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories