x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

PhoneArena Awards 2011: Best Innovation

0. phoneArena 25 Nov 2011, 10:32 posted on

It's time for our second post in the PhoneArena Awards 2011 series, where we acknowledge the best (or worse) products, technologies and achievements that have occurred during the year. This time, we'll be awarding the most significant innovations that have happened within the wireless industry this year...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 10:35 10

1. Birds (Posts: 1164; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)

Where is the Galaxy Nexus Review????? lol Sorry to be pushy but I want it NOW!!!!

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 10:37 9

2. tacohunter (Posts: 408; Member since: 06 Nov 2011)

Now you're all happy there's nothing from apple in it.

Just say yes. Be happy.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 10:48 7

4. hepresearch (unregistered)

Oh, I am. It is so nice... you have no clue. =8-P

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 11:45 3

8. rendHELL (Posts: 304; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)

he does not... XD

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 11:07 9

6. Leodrade (Posts: 87; Member since: 26 Aug 2011)

Why would i be happy? It's an obligation for them to not put Apple, they didn't innovate at all this year, they just sold well

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 11:44 7

7. rendHELL (Posts: 304; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)


posted on 25 Nov 2011, 12:26 4

9. Muhannad (Posts: 455; Member since: 20 Sep 2011)

Very true, the "Retina Display" was an innovation or maybe it's just evolution like how the article states processor bumps from 1Ghz to 1.5Ghz isn't innovative.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 22:42 7

23. megalord (Posts: 3; Member since: 25 Nov 2011)

Retina display was made and developed by LG, not apple. If retina display is regarded as innovative, the award goes to LG, not apple.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 13:28 1

11. JGuinan007 (Posts: 685; Member since: 19 May 2011)

I'm not a big fan of Apple Ithink they are overprice and don't offer the best hardware but I am surprised not to see any mention of SIRI I actually think it's a great innovative product that will change smartphones in the future I think we will see more programs like this integrated into other OSs hopefully google will create one and I'm sure MS will also

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 22:45 1

24. megalord (Posts: 3; Member since: 25 Nov 2011)

Android already has voice recognition quite a while back. Siri was made by an app developer, not apple. Apple simply bought them over. Talk about innovation, its the siri people that deserves it, not apple.

And the dragon voice recognition software was implemented long time before siri and google had something up their sleeves. And it has got voice adaptation. Say goodbye to accent issues.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 13:29 4

12. Martine (Posts: 102; Member since: 20 Oct 2011)

I though this is all about Innovation.
Does apple innovate?

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 14:03

14. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5993; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)

It is kind of hard to get all excited over Siri.... Google Wallet, OTOH if it can get a wide footprint quickly could be HUGE. It is kind of odd that Apple chose to put their energies into Siri when they could have put effort into iWallet. Maybe they found that Google was too far along for them?

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 15:30 3

15. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

thats because Apple didnt have any innovations this year. they released the same phone with an underclocked dual core processor and voice commands. siri's canned wit is nice, but in the end its an evolved voice command system... that it bought another company to get. not innovation.. thats cash flow.. lol

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 20:18 1

21. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

Google bought android and then had their engineers make a replica of iOS and inserted widgets.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 21:22 5

22. denney (Posts: 98; Member since: 20 Oct 2011)

Taco, explain to me how to remove an application icon from the iPhone homescreen without removing the application from the phone.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 22:49 5

25. megalord (Posts: 3; Member since: 25 Nov 2011)

I beg to differ. Compare the android in 2005 and that of it today. Is it even comparable?

and do get your facts right. Apple blatantly copied many of android and blackberry features, especially in iOS 5. Not the other way round. If android and blackberry is a replica of iOS, why do iOS have to copy features from the replica? If the replica is better than the original, is it still a replica?

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 10:39 6

3. LewsTherin006 (Posts: 140; Member since: 18 Nov 2011)

well the name of the article is Best Innovation, not Best way of taking something already made and marketing it better than anyone else. Apple would sweep that.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 10:49

5. hepresearch (unregistered)

Google Wallet I agree with... the other two? Meh.........

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 13:15 8

10. som (Posts: 768; Member since: 10 Nov 2009)

Apple did not invented or produced their own products so no Award for Apple crap.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 13:34

13. downphoenix (Posts: 3165; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)

I would agree with the google wallet one but the extremely, extremely limited application of it so far really would make it more of an innovation later. Stuff like the glasses free 3D is something that most or all users of the EVO 3D and Thrill 4G phones can use NOW. The google wallet/nfc thing is something most Nexus S users have not used and may not use until 2013 at the earliest.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 15:55 1

17. sgogeta4 (Posts: 394; Member since: 02 Feb 2011)

It is currently being used, so just because it's not widely used yet, doesn't mean it isn't innovative now.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 15:34

16. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

I think the pad-phone concept could POTENTIALLY be a game changer if it catches on. As phones dig into dual and quad core set ups and ICS becomes the same on both phone and tablet.. it really negates the need for 2 devices (do you really need an iphone and an ipad?? its the same thing but bigger). If the "tablet" part of the concept was as simple as it should be (insert phone, magically makes screen bigger), then that is all most people would really need that have a high powered phone and want a tablet for media n such.

T3 enabled phone with ICS + a "tablet" add on with a second battery inside it would be high up on my list of things to get. And if they make it "forward" compatible, you could upgrade your phone to a new one, and still use your tablet add-on.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 19:57

18. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

Siri is very innovative fandroids. Sorry to burst your bubble. Enjoy you're "victory" on PA while Apple wins everyday in real life.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 20:05 1

19. Eingild (Posts: 203; Member since: 19 Apr 2011)

Voice assistant is already available long before the first iPhone was announced. They just improved the experience with a more natural approach. But they didn't innovate. "Revolutionized" is a more appropriate term. You should know the difference.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 20:12

20. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

revolutionized and innovated go hand in hand. Voice controls to artificial intelligence is a giant leap. So far Apple is alone on smartphones

posted on 26 Nov 2011, 12:15 1

31. hepresearch (unregistered)

Invention refers to the emergence of a new technology, usually in a pre-commercial setting.

Innovation refers to the development of a new application of technology for commercial release, usually in a way that presents new opportunities for uses hitherto unseen.

Evolution refers to the further development of an application of a technology over time, with new changes in features that enhance the original use of the related base technology. Early adopters often use evolving technology when it becomes commercially available.

Revolution refers to the maximal evolution of a given technology, often in such a way that the technology becomes perfected and fairly universal or foundational to many daughter-technologies that may follow. While many consumers begin using technology during the latter stages of its evolution, general consumers often begin using a technology only after it has become revolutionary.

Revolution is not the same as innovation. Siri is an evolutionary step. I have seen no sign of AI in Siri, anyway.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 23:04

27. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

neither are an appropriate term.
Evolution is. Siri is a nice step forward from android notifications in the way that it can understand more than 1 way to say a command.. that is evolution, not revolution.

posted on 27 Nov 2011, 04:02

33. Eingild (Posts: 203; Member since: 19 Apr 2011)

Thanks for fixing that.

posted on 25 Nov 2011, 23:03 3

26. remixfa (Posts: 14255; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

wins... by.. what? having a nearly stagnant market position while android climbs what 15% in the last year? iOS5 is buggier than anything android has put out in quite a while. While android is getting praised for its stability and security, iOS is having issue after issue.

Maybe instead of repeating tired platitudes, you could actually read whats going on? That would be neat-o.

I really dont understand your mentality. What exactly do you win? Who is having this contest?

posted on 26 Nov 2011, 06:46 2

29. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)

Taco, this is not the first time you've claimed that Siri is artificial intelligence. You're dead wrong. Siri is simply a series of preprogrammed answers to preprogrammed questions. It's designed to give the APPEARANCE of intelligence, but it's merely an illusion, like the Furby my little brother once received for Christmas.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories