x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Patents granted to Google rose 170% in 2012

0. phoneArena 10 Jan 2013, 11:34 posted on

Google's intellectual property portfolio increased last year as the number of patents granted to the Mountain View based company soared 170% in 2012 and surpassed the number of patents received by rival tech titan Apple; Google recently agreed with the FTC not to use the SEP patents it acquired from Motorola to seek sales bans...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 11:39 13

1. MeoCao (unregistered)


Google please put the patents to good use and teach the patent trolls some memorable lessons.

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 12:08 1

2. _Bone_ (Posts: 2140; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


A bit off: if something is provided by stock Android SW, say double tap, pinch-to-zoom, icon layout, rubber wall etc., how come Apple sues Samsung but not Google for it?

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 12:21 4

4. Fallout09 (Posts: 419; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Because Google doesnt charge for the use of Android. IE... No monetary gain from the lawsuit.

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 13:08

5. _Bone_ (Posts: 2140; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


But Samsung did not make the SW that supposedly infringes mentioned patents, Google did. Samsung merely licences it just like some manufacturers licence Mercedes engines - if there's something wrong with them, it's Mercedes' fault, not theirs...

Oh and Google makes a lot of money off Google services, advertisements, apps, music, movies, book, whatever bought under your Android device, and again, they wrote some of the code infringing patents, Sammy is legally licencing and tweaking it, so how come they get sued successfully if it's not their SW in the 1st place?

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 13:38 1

7. Fallout09 (Posts: 419; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Once again.... Google is not selling Android. They are following the old Gillette razor business model where they give away a product to get people onboard and make profit from other avenues. IE no direct profit from the OS. Samsung (for example) is taking source code, tweaking legally the "borrowed code" to fit their devices and selling for an actual profit. The only reason Samsung Vs Apple has seen their day in court is beause they are selling in mass quanities and Apple wants some of that money.

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 17:52

10. joey_sfb (Posts: 3270; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)


Apple fan are happy to buy a $50 buck cable but not me. Most of the 'so called' patents you have mentioned has been invalided. So apple won't get a single cent from it.

Live with it!!!

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 12:16 5

3. drnggaj33 (Posts: 127; Member since: 29 Feb 2012)


perfect google keep doing a good job battle on

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 13:15 2

6. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6741; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)


Ftc should say the same to Apple & ms. Im getting sick of these patent news posted on this site

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 14:03 2

8. HTCOE (Posts: 524; Member since: 20 Nov 2011)


the Motorola X-Phone will be amazing

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 14:44 2

9. thunderbolt (Posts: 76; Member since: 10 Jan 2013)


Good at least Apple has 1,151 patents less. If it was not for google they would have hogged these 1,151 patents also.

posted on 10 Jan 2013, 19:10

11. papss (unregistered)


They need to work on knowing how to polish there products instead of trying to win the patent war (that Nokia owns)

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories