Patents granted to Google rose 170% in 2012
Google recently reached an agreement with the FTC not to use its standards-essential patents, most of which it picked up with the 2011 acquisition of Motorola Mobility, to request a sales ban on a rival company. The other day, Google dropped a pair of patent claims against Microsoft after originally seeking a ban on the U.S.import of the Xbox game console. The standards-essential patents are supposed to be licensed using fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) negotiations.
Google has been trying to beef up its intellectual patent portfolio to put it in a stronger position to take on companies like Apple that had been flexing its patent muscles in court. The recent joint-policy statement between the Justice Department and the USPTO decrying the use of SEP patents to force a sales ban against competitors has forced Google to take a step back a little with this strategy.
1. MeoCao (unregistered)
Google please put the patents to good use and teach the patent trolls some memorable lessons.
2. _Bone_ (Posts: 1755; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
A bit off: if something is provided by stock Android SW, say double tap, pinch-to-zoom, icon layout, rubber wall etc., how come Apple sues Samsung but not Google for it?
4. Fallout09 (Posts: 397; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Because Google doesnt charge for the use of Android. IE... No monetary gain from the lawsuit.
5. _Bone_ (Posts: 1755; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)
But Samsung did not make the SW that supposedly infringes mentioned patents, Google did. Samsung merely licences it just like some manufacturers licence Mercedes engines - if there's something wrong with them, it's Mercedes' fault, not theirs...
Oh and Google makes a lot of money off Google services, advertisements, apps, music, movies, book, whatever bought under your Android device, and again, they wrote some of the code infringing patents, Sammy is legally licencing and tweaking it, so how come they get sued successfully if it's not their SW in the 1st place?
7. Fallout09 (Posts: 397; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
Once again.... Google is not selling Android. They are following the old Gillette razor business model where they give away a product to get people onboard and make profit from other avenues. IE no direct profit from the OS. Samsung (for example) is taking source code, tweaking legally the "borrowed code" to fit their devices and selling for an actual profit. The only reason Samsung Vs Apple has seen their day in court is beause they are selling in mass quanities and Apple wants some of that money.
10. joey_sfb (Posts: 1491; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)
Apple fan are happy to buy a $50 buck cable but not me. Most of the 'so called' patents you have mentioned has been invalided. So apple won't get a single cent from it.
Live with it!!!
3. drnggaj33 (Posts: 127; Member since: 29 Feb 2012)
perfect google keep doing a good job battle on
6. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 5180; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Ftc should say the same to Apple & ms. Im getting sick of these patent news posted on this site
9. thunderbolt (Posts: 76; Member since: 10 Jan 2013)
Good at least Apple has 1,151 patents less. If it was not for google they would have hogged these 1,151 patents also.
11. papss (Posts: 2192; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)
They need to work on knowing how to polish there products instead of trying to win the patent war (that Nokia owns)