x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Oracle loses bid to resurrect 3rd patent against Android

Oracle loses bid to resurrect 3rd patent against Android

Posted: , by Scott H.

Tags:

Oracle loses bid to resurrect 3rd patent against Android
Just a quick note for those of you following the Oracle v. Google case blow by blow: Oracle had requested an “earliest possible date” for the trial rather than wait for the full review of all of the patents they had lost to the USPTO review process. When the USPTO did in fact reverse one of their invalidations last week, Oracle attempted to reintroduce it to the case, making the somewhat questionable argument that while the trial had started (which was the agreed upon cutoff date) that they should still be allowed to assert the patent because “the patent portion of the trial had not yet started”.

Judge Alsup was apparently not amused by the attempt to twist his own words, and ruled just a little while ago that Oracle may not reintroduce the ‘702, or “Gosling” patent back into the case. Worse for Oracle, they were basically told that this is on them; since Oracle was the one who requested the terms of the deal, the judge essentially indicated they will “just have to live with” having the Gosling patent dismissed with prejudice, meaning they can never again assert it against Google in a court of law.

The relevant part of the ruling says:

Oracle’s argument that the patent “trial” has not yet started is wrong. The (sic) was and is one trial with three phases. The trial started on April 16. This is not only the plain meaning of the term but any other interpretation would inject great prejudice given that the parties have relied on the issues to be tried and that reliance should not be turned on its head in mid-trial. Oracle will be required to stand by its word and live with the dismissal with prejudice.

If you want to read the whole thing (it’s just over a double-spaced page in length) you can click on the source link.

Source: Official Ruling via Wired

5 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 25 Apr 2012, 19:53 8

1. Devon (Posts: 11; Member since: 07 Oct 2011)


Oh, and Oracle toad Florian Mueller was just referring to this patent as a phoenix risen from the ashes. Seems like he's pulling crap from his arse again and putting the old positive spin on it.

posted on 25 Apr 2012, 20:00 3

2. Scott_H (Posts: 167; Member since: 28 Oct 2011)


He actually had two posts on it, including one today that he managed to update quickly after it was tweeted that the judge "would be considering it". It'll be interesting to see what (if anything) is said about the ruling now that it's out.

posted on 25 Apr 2012, 20:14 4

3. Fluxman (Posts: 51; Member since: 03 Jun 2010)


ya, i read that post. He couldn't stop talking about how Oracles claims are valid and there was no way the judge would dismiss it. Then he did. Really calls into question not only his bias, but his "expert analyst" title. Wasn't it steve jobs who said analysts are all full of s**t?

posted on 26 Apr 2012, 00:13 3

5. jroc74 (Posts: 5192; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


Florian Mueller is garbage....and some folks look to his analysis as gospel...lol.

Some of us in these forums around the net probably do a better job than he does.

posted on 25 Apr 2012, 20:28 6

4. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5954; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Memo to Larry - be careful of what you ask for. You might actually get it.

Time to wave buh bye to Google, as the Android ship is pulling away from the Oracle dock.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories