Optical Image Stabilization coming to the rear camera on the Samsung Galaxy Note 3?
0. phoneArena 27 May 2013, 16:11 posted on
We've shown you a video showing off the Optical Image Stabilization technology on the Nokia Lumia 928; the clip displayed a video taken by the phone while it was attached to a remote control copter. Instead of jumping all over the place, you would have thought that the smooth video was filmed using a tripod...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
98. Jason2k13 (Posts: 551; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)
your an idiot, I've never seen a samsung fanboy, or any fanboys saying OIS is a gimmick, when its obviously a good piece of technology that's been around on cameras for awhile now.
Go show me a comment of a samsung fanboy saying OIS was a gimmick?
116. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
check any Nokia comparison or review, especially those made by ray s between sIII apple, htc and Nokia. Maybe you didn't say that but a bunch of immature trolls did. Many times.
Idiot is your father 'cause he gave you a chance to live in society. Do you feel better being insulted? Cut this "idiot" crap. You presents "ad hominem" style.
119. tashreef (Posts: 475; Member since: 24 Nov 2012)
don't try to be so innocent, If Nokia uses Dual-core processors, samsung fanboys says it's 2012 specs and bash Nokia, even though it's not necessary because wp works flawlessly on Dual-core and even with 512 MB RAM
Now what happened samsung is using OIS, introduced by Nokia (smartphone) in 2012.... Now it's a Great Idea, ahh
now if they want a great camera why they don't just a DSLR, like they used to comment on Nokia articles..despos
23. Rehankhan (Posts: 323; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)
papss GTFO this is samsung article go back to your nokia article
30. TheBitterTruth (unregistered)
Butt hurt fanboys
47. TheBitterTruth (unregistered)
One is enough to bash you.
52. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
and you're taking sh%^ in your pants because samsung has just promised that they will copy Nokia's technoplogy and implement it into your andropfone
62. TheBitterTruth (unregistered)
you mean *lagdroid
73. SleepingOz (Posts: 2483; Member since: 22 Oct 2011)
Android on Samsung's flagships is, not only, as fluid as iOS and WP but can even replace a PC for light/medium tasks. Can you tell the same about the half-baked, restricted WP/nokia? LMAO! Haters gonna hate! =]
75. TheBitterTruth (unregistered)
Android even sometimes lags on Octacore
Windows runs smoothly on dual core.
iOS runs smoothly on dual core.
And this is all coming from a Android user.
78. Oxygen (Posts: 77; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)
This is because the apps, themes, skins aren't optimized. Android itself doesn't lag at all. Also, Android has much much more to offer(something you'd already know that if you really use android). Just watch the video Oz posted.
129. TheBitterTruth (unregistered)
Ok so what should consumers do?
I know Android is the best OS for now follwed by iOS. I am also an android user.
If Android is laggy they should fix it.. Samsung is releasing everyday a new galaxy instead of fixing it.
143. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
Halfbaked bread still unmatured and needs only 140Mb of Ram to run.
121. tashreef (Posts: 475; Member since: 24 Nov 2012)
biggest joke, yesterday my friends S3 was lagging when he was trying transfer data from his device, and you say it's lag free, no Android is lag free...
In every new update Google promises to fix the lag, but as usual they faile...
134. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
at least, wp is fluid as your andro will never be...at least, now in the nearest future...it runs on old java machine which is a lazy cow...even project butter can't optimize it properly.
144. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
And yours will take another 3years to become a full OS, still in process. Hardly has any apps and games. Go beg.
Even carriers arnt taking Nokia Lumia phones, cause they even say its junk phone with junk OS. Nokia was so desperate begging Verizon and At&T, even here in UK all nokia phones are cheap, even highends.
Nonsense pathetic loosers.®
24. LionStone (Posts: 434; Member since: 10 Dec 2010)
Now Samsung wants to join HTC and Nokia with OIS tech...welcome :-)
25. papss (Posts: 3445; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)
No thanks... I'll comment how I please and to me this is great news to comment on..im sure it will be revolutionary now that it will come to a SS phone.
36. protozeloz (Posts: 5328; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
It would actually be boarding because it will be on a huge phone to begin with, also the world revolutionary... You are using it on the wrong camp...
53. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
how revolutionary it may be whereas Nokia did a few months ago, so did HTC after Nokia?
Since when copying ideas is revolutionary?
I wonder how on earth samsung hasn't copied PureView technology yet?
93. HouTexan (Posts: 283; Member since: 08 Jan 2012)
Idiot, you should be directing that 'revolutionary' word at the Apple camp. Wrong camp, loser.
117. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
OOO...hey hey samsung-shee%^/....nobody can't say anything wrong at sammyboy.
They're copying. Open your eyes and start thinking. Your brain must be like the touchwiz. Half-baked.
26. MistB (Posts: 543; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)
The fact that a Samsung article attracts so many vocal haters just eschews the fact that Samsung really is the Android King and the only one from the google camp that can challenge Apple for popularity. Just watch how many red thumbs this comment will get, it only just proves a point of the stupidity and childish views of a few kids here. Lighten up folks, it's just a phone!
56. jackhammeR (Posts: 1548; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)
he's a so-called king like apple was...using the same ways as apple did.
COPYING COPYING COPYING and has it's own sh$%ps
28. papss (Posts: 3445; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)
Well WP8 must be HUGE then... Mistb you are there in full force.. I don't want to hear it..
58. SleepingOz (Posts: 2483; Member since: 22 Oct 2011)
Nah, not really and that seems to make you mad. May be one day but not today. =]
84. Edmund (Posts: 645; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)
"The buzz around the water cooler is that the Korean based OEM was also looking at adding 3X optical zoom to the phablet's rear camera, but was forced to reconsider because of the thickness that would have been added to the device."
So basically this is a story about nothing ??? Typical phone arena publicity for samsung/android.
99. nvrhde (Posts: 65; Member since: 10 Nov 2012)
Nikon produced the first optical stabilized lens camera in 1994
105. Klevis88 (Posts: 12; Member since: 15 May 2013)
The problem is to miniaturize it to fit into a smartphone. It is like comparing the computers of the 70s with the computers of today.
106. drkavint (Posts: 11; Member since: 27 Feb 2013)
whether copy cat or not they got guts to market.. look at nokia launching a phone with 1gb ram as top model and launching asha with 64mb ram... what a pathetic experience.. samsung never boosted about 2gb ram, they know from sucess of iphone smooth experience counts a lot than useless camera..
not all people is fond of applications and camera, but a faster phone with good browsing experience and expandable memory is must...
samsung knows it.. nokia and microsoft has become laurell and hardy partnership.. a master comic piece..
108. byazatt (Posts: 159; Member since: 26 Oct 2012)
Does it mean that if an oem comes up with a feature first, then others should never have it. Because this copy cat chat here is just outrageous. Is there one oem that has not borrowed a leaf from another?
109. xperiaDROID (Posts: 4835; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)
Wow! Too much hate on this article! Calm down guys, it's just a smartphone!
130. JMartin22 (Posts: 643; Member since: 30 Apr 2013)
The Galaxy line-up really needs to improve low-light performance. For some reason, even with the latest and greatest camera module sensors, they still fall flat in this department. Other than that, the photo quality in other environmental conditions is great or excellent.