x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Oppo VP resigns, escalating rumors of a possible Oppo/CyanogenMod smartphone brand

0. phoneArena 18 Nov 2013, 05:42 posted on

A rumor got jump-started during the weekend, claiming that Chinese Oppo may be planning a separate online smartphone company that will combine the premium manufacturer's build quality...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 18 Nov 2013, 05:48 4

1. D.Aceveda (Posts: 366; Member since: 30 Jun 2012)


This would be great if true.

But please, add some diversity to the market and use the Tegra 4 or Atom. The Snapdragon 800 is great.....but there are other chips out there

posted on 18 Nov 2013, 07:35 2

3. yowanvista (Posts: 318; Member since: 20 Sep 2011)


The Tegra SoC along with its sources and blobs are closed sourced and all the proprietary stuff isn't accessible to all. Reason for which Tegra never really took off in the community. A truly 'open' device won't ever emerge unless Nvidia drops the insane licensing prices and opens the platform. On the other hand Intel Atom SoCs won't really offer any kind of advantage to the user, in fact it's quite the opposite since most Android apps are made using the NDK so they are architecture-dependant. And let's not forget that x86 SoCs only make up a very tiny portion of the SoC share so using x86 instead of ARM wouldn't really make sense.

posted on 18 Nov 2013, 16:10 1

5. D.Aceveda (Posts: 366; Member since: 30 Jun 2012)


What you said made no sense lol. Every SoC is "closed sourced"

posted on 19 Nov 2013, 06:05

6. yowanvista (Posts: 318; Member since: 20 Sep 2011)


Not true, all vendors must make their kernel sources available available as per GPL requirement (proprietary blobs are excluded). Naturally Qualcomm msm chips are the most open SoCs out there since their kernel sources and blobs are complete and made available on CodeAurora and AOSP repository EVEN if the sources are proprietary. The same can't be said for Exynos, Samsung's insignal repo is largely outdated and incomplete, lacking several core components for AOSP development. Nvidia didn't even open their binaries nor do they even maintain an official git repo with updated code with so development of whatever custom rom is hampered. Please go and educate yourself before sprouting crap.

posted on 18 Nov 2013, 07:27 1

2. mholeydroid (Posts: 13; Member since: 02 May 2012)


isn't it a little faster 800?

posted on 18 Nov 2013, 07:53

4. _Bone_ (Posts: 2140; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)


I kinda like the Oppo name, it's catchy, CyanogenModPhone would sound a lot worse They are on the right track, the N1 is a pretty exciting device and other Oppos sold pretty good in Asia, so they are definitely profitable. The hard part is doing a breakthrough abroad, Lenovo makes some of the best laptops and exactly no one buys their phones in the West. Xiaomi is definitely the model to follow, it already has a cult-like following in Europe, hundreds of thousands get it over the grey market, and if they open an EU HQ, it will sell like hotcakes.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories