O2's HTC One X+ owners: no charger, no problem

2. papss posted on 18 Jan 2013, 07:54 2 0

I'm a tech guy but the environment needs consideration

3. lallolu posted on 18 Jan 2013, 07:56 3 0

Good.

4. duwiegeneral posted on 18 Jan 2013, 08:08 3 0

great move!!

5. buccob posted on 18 Jan 2013, 09:12 2 0

I didn't know "U2" was also in the electronic chargers business, beside music.

6. xtremesv posted on 18 Jan 2013, 09:50 4 0

Sure I have 2 chargers collecting dust in my room but none of those could charge my Galaxy S III quick enough, I think they only put out 0.6 amp. So I assume future smartphones with larger batteries will require higher capacity chargers to keep charging time within a reasonable parameter, so for me, O2 new charger business is not good for consumers.

9. amiroo posted on 18 Jan 2013, 12:47 3 0

sure its very interesting.

11. sats.mine2k4 posted on 18 Jan 2013, 16:11 4 0

Environmental friends... ok fine Good motive!!! No comments for me
How much did each customer save? and how much did O2 profit from not giving an included charger? I just want to confirm your not showing/using environmental needs to boost your profits...

13. cripton805 posted on 18 Jan 2013, 16:19 2 0

18% is still a large number. What if those 18% feel ripped off. I don't have any extra chargers because I usually sell my phone second hand every couple of months.

I think this is a bad idea for HTC. They are suffering as it is. This little extra they don't offer could push another sale to another phone.

15. belovedson posted on 19 Jan 2013, 03:23 0 0

if your not going to offer a charger lower the dang prices otherwise piss off htc