Nortel patent win by Apple, Microsoft and RIM against Google might be investigated by antitrust regulators
0. phoneArena 11 Jul 2011, 05:12 posted on
The winning bid is apparently being scrutinized by antitrust regulators in the FTC and DOJ, says unnamed source, which are trying to figure out if the deal wasn't deliberately created to choke Android's patent lifeline that Nortel's intellectual property would create...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. Sniggly (Posts: 7297; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)
When the rebellion becomes too strong, the empires must unite to take it down.
2. protozeloz (Posts: 5393; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
I know there is something fishy going ...
4. christianqwerty (Posts: 467; Member since: 05 May 2011)
Google is just mad they didn't win the patents....
6. protozeloz (Posts: 5393; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
Yeah.... like its pretty normal to see apple and Microsoft on the same side... this winning bid may be just used to Sue other companies and make them pay some $$$$$ or remove them from the market
7. corps1089 (Posts: 492; Member since: 20 Jan 2010)
So its antitrust to dominate the market by consolidating competition and imposing your single agenda on consumers, but its also antitrust to team up with competitors to gobble up a larger company and divide it's pieces amoung the crowd?
Which is it guys? Oh yeah, maybe it's favoritism from a government agency... go figure.
9. AppleFUD (unregistered)
Yes, it is anti-competitive behavior to make certain types of agreements with competitors. Like price fixing. Every heard of that?
This would be no different. Competitors of Google who are getting their mobile a$$es handed to them team up to create a "fix" that will favor them over others, especially Google. . . DUH!
Now put down the punch and walk away.
8. messiah (Posts: 434; Member since: 19 Feb 2010)
Clearly Google is doing something right if all other sworn enemies are trying to vainly disrupt Google's performance and skyrocketing market share.
I say Google just proved a victory here
15. ladyhaly (Posts: 106; Member since: 17 Jan 2011)
The act itself is indicative of such. Otherwise, would such an event even exist? No. You do not join arms with your opponent unless necessity deems you to.
10. Mike S (unregistered)
If you look at the recent activities ( lawsuits and attacking alliances ) by the big three Microsoft, Apple, and Oracle there seems to a lot collusion for the purpose of killing open software of which Google is the biggest user and proponent and with Android being the most successful platform.
It looks like Microsoft is back to its all monopolistic practices since it can't compete through innovation. There is definitely collusion here and it needs to be investigated since ultimately is the the consumer that loses by lack of choices.
13. hepresearch (unregistered)
Not sure if I agree, but it is possible, and I like the thought.
16. ladyhaly (Posts: 106; Member since: 17 Jan 2011)
That's true. The huge innovative revolution in the technology arena for smartphones and tablets as of this age have come to benefit consumers over all. Google with its Android OS-enriched devices (most of them branded by manufacturer) paved the way for Apple's iPhone to have tough competition--- thereby resulting in this influx of new, improved, and highly capable handsets able to serve our purposes and help us in our daily lives being released every few months.
Microsoft, Sony Ericsson, and RIM lost a lot of market share when Samsung, HTC, Motorola, and LG produced beautiful, intuitive, functional, and premium Android devices. The former three teaming up with Apple in order to eliminate the culprit of HTC and Samsung's increasing market shares seem... necessary in order to get their less popular handsets back in the market game.
I dislike what they did. I'm just glad Nokia didn't get involved with that Rockstar Bidco thing. It's like pulling on dirty tricks on someone to disable them because you just can't keep up with competing fairly against their brilliance. While someone can argue that what they did is legal, do take note that not everything that can legally be done is honorable. It's like bullying--- but in a subtle grown-up modern capitalist way.
This being said, I don't think I'll be buying any Sony Ericsson, RIM (Blackberry), or Windows Phone 7 handset any time soon. What Microsoft tried to do disgusts me most, since with the elimination of Android, there would only be their mobile OS to turn to if consumers wanted a refined user experience. Before Android came to view, their Windows Mobile OS sucked. And I know because I owned one. Ended up throwing the device against the wall because it was a brick--- nothing else. Made my life miserable, what with messages coming in late, lagging, taking up 3 minutes just to text, "Okay, will be there soon"... It's a really negative experience.
12. The_Miz (Posts: 1496; Member since: 06 Apr 2011)
Sounds like a company is bitter that they lost the patents. Maybe they should spend less time whining and more time fixing the buggy as hell Android.
14. MorePhonesThanNeeded (unregistered)
You sire are an idiot, Google isn't doing anything. The FTC and DOJ are looking into this because it looks incredibly ridiculous and following the wave of lawsuits directed towards Google by few of the cadre of companies in that consortium is cause for alarm. I hate stupid people even more than I hate stupidity...yes it's a choice to be that blind and stupid which you seem to have no problem doing. Carry on sir as your posts do tend to amuse me at times.
17. ladyhaly (Posts: 106; Member since: 17 Jan 2011)
Less time whining and more time fixing? Oh wait. You mean you? Yes. You definitely need that.