Nokia's three musketeers: Lumia 925 vs 928 vs 920 specs comparison

It also the lightest of the three flagship Lumias, at 4.90 oz (139 g), making it about the norm for a handset with a 4.5" display. Thus it addresses the biggest criticisms laid out against the Lumia 920 when it landed in the hands of consumers. Arguably due to its built-in wireless charging coil, the 920 is thick and feels pretty heavy for a modern smartphone, while the 925 offers wireless charging via a separate cover, if you are so inclined.

Thus it manages to keep the chassis very thin, and adds an aluminum side frame, which also serves as an antenna. The use of metal is a first for a Lumia phone, and coupled with the compact dimensions makes the 925 the best Windows Phone flagship from Nokia so far.

If we don't count the lack of a Xenon flash, that is, because the Lumia 928, despite being only slightly thinner than the 920, adds Xenon in addition to the LED video light, making it the first Windows Phone, and the first phone with a modern mobile OS to feature one at all. Verizon's 928 does all this by keeping the weight in check compared to the 920, and introduces a more blocky, rectangular shape to the Lumia 9xx mixer of three. It also sports an AMOLED display, just like the new 925, meaning you can have Nokia's clock and other info floating around on the screen while the phone sleeps, made possible by the OLED technology.

The Lumia 925 dials its internal storage down from the 32 GB of the others, to 16 GB, otherwise the three flagship WP8 musketeers seem to be sharing absolutely the same internals - a dual-core Snapdragon, 1 GB of RAM and 2000 mAh battery packs. Which one would you pick?