x PhoneArena is looking for new authors in New York! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Nokia sold over 2 million Lumias in Q1, lowers outlook as margins evaporate

0. phoneArena 11 Apr 2012, 07:41 posted on

The first Nokia Windows Phone sales numbers are in: Nokia sold 2 million units of its newly launched Lumia series…

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 12:21 3

72. remixfa (Posts: 13905; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


that is exactly what WP7 is. its kind of like if iOS and android had a lovechild. its more iOS than android, but it has enough android in it to differentiate.. especially when it comes to hitting price points.

Then you throw in windows 8 pc, the integration of every MS device to Metro UI (ford sync for example), and you have a winning combo.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 09:29

35. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Wow, that's incredible.
Have you ever even seen a quad core in action?
Your have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 08:15 4

11. AppleConspiracy (Posts: 629; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


We have all aready knew that even a year ago when this Nokia+MS strategy was announced. It was utterly wrong, and Stephen Elop didn't want to hear suggestions from the world.

When they decided to dump MeeGo and excellent repsonse from N9, I knew they would fail. They can't compete with Apple and Droids, they are integrated in a perfectly stable paradigm, and Windows Phone is not, despite being a quality OS.

They signed their death certificate, and this is pretty much expected confirmation.

It's not so-called lack of vision that Steve Jobs had and others didn't, it's some strange lack of common sense in CEO-s of the World (RIM, Nokia, Sony...) that everyone else have except for them.

I just don't get it - as if the qualification to run once an industry leader is not having even average IQ.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 08:36

19. JSern (Posts: 282; Member since: 22 May 2011)


tl;dr

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 08:59

25. Pdubb (Posts: 239; Member since: 08 Aug 2011)


MeeGo wasn't enough. What is the main problem people have with WP7 as of now? No apps! MeeGo has the same problem and it does not have the cash of MS to sustain it while it grows or market the devices. Nokia was in a hard place I think they made a wise choice but time will tell.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 09:10 3

29. remixfa (Posts: 13905; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


your thinking is so minimalistic and absolute. You are acting as if there is no room for 3, 4, or 5 phone OS's. Blackberry is out the window. MS is a known business partner. They are in a great position to take up a lot of business's needs as blackberry falls. They have the price point, the security, the brand recognition, and the fact that they are installed on more PC's than any other OS. With WP8 becoming a cohesive OS between PC and phone, it makes their position even stronger. It is also easy and intuitive which makes it very popular with teens and older people who want their first smartphone. I know, thats the 2 main groups I sell windows to. Both of those groups are main areas where mobile hand sets are expanding. You know.. the other 50% of americans who dont have smart phones.

Your position stems from personal investment in an OS or from lack of knowledge.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 09:44 4

39. snowgator (Posts: 3209; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


Again, the idea that either MeeGo or Symbian would have been a better solution for Nokia is a silly idea that shows you do not see the forest for the trees.

Nokia was going broke. Their infrastructure was so streched that being the single largest phone manufacturer wasn't helping their bottom line. They were maintaining/updating/fixing 1 OS, trying to develop and market a new OS, trying to market their existing handsets worldwide, trying to develop and maintain their hardware, and trying to reign in this HUGE structure of a corporation that had dozens of layers of bureacratic nightmare all over it. By shedding Symbian and MeeGo and going to Windows Phones with MS (after talking to both Google about Android and RIM about BB07), they got a partner needing them as much as Nokia needed help. They can turn a greater profit on WP devices even if they sell less due to shedding all the layers of crap on the software side. MeeGo wasn't ready, had no app development, was a virtual unknown to the world, and was all on Nokia to promote. Symbian was falling behind, had dozens of versions to support, and was all on Nokia to support. WP is devloped and supported by Microsoft. Money in the bank.

I believe this is why RIM is failing: an inability to devlop both sides of the equation and keep up. I believe this is why Apple may have peaked. I DO NOT MEAN DECLINING, Apple has way too many resourses built up to lose a ton of marketshare, I only mean that they have reached their appex. By developing both hardware and software, Apple cannot innovate at the pace of those only developing one side.

Nokia did what they had to. They will either rise or fall on the strength of WP, but they would have fallen under their own weight had they kept on the same path.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 10:19 2

51. hepresearch (unregistered)


There is no lack of common sense here... imho, this is a market-shaping conspiracy among the top echelon... this is a tactical play to shepherd the common consumer into a particular zone at a particular time... I just do not know the reason yet. These CEO's are not stupid, although they love to throw us little fake hints to help us think they are, and it gives them an excuse to keep acting the way they are already perceived to be. Elop keeps pretending to be dumb and all, and people who like Nokia tend to not be all that enthused with his behavior, and say that he is inadvertently shooting Nokia in the foot... however, from where I'm sitting, it looks to me that there is nothing inadvertent about it... the behavior is too consistent and calculated to be random stupidity... to me it looks like Elop is intentionally shooting Nokia in the foot every time he needs to in order to keep them down but not totally dead yet. It smacks of conspiracy to me. I believe that most of them know what is up, and the one's who don't are being compensated well to play their part in either partial or total ignorance.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 10:25 1

53. remixfa (Posts: 13905; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


he is not shooting nokia in the foot. he is doing a controlled burn to get rid of the underbrush that is killing nokia slowly but surely. Gator was dead on the money.

Sometimes you have to burn the city to make it better in the long run.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 11:25

61. hepresearch (unregistered)


Yeah, like Caesar Nero in Rome, eh?

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 11:32 1

63. remixfa (Posts: 13905; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


nero was a bit of a nutjob. if i remember right, wasnt he the one that wanted to marry his horse and make it a senator? might not be the best comparison. lol

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 11:48 2

67. hepresearch (unregistered)


Actually comparing the behavior, not the person. I am not a fan of artificial controlled-burns in the market. Let them happen naturally... the market will correct itself as long as sufficient information is openly available to the public.

Nero gave secret orders to set fire to the heart of Rome, and then sat by and cheered it on as it got worse. It burned out the old city center of ancient Rome, and as had been planned in advance, Nero took advantage of the opportunity to rebuild it in his own favored image... but at the expense of all the people who would have protested the idea, and initially thought it was just a terrible disaster. There were also many who lost their lives in it because it was carried out without the knowledge of the victims, and without warning.

Similar things are going on at Nokia and MS... there is an agenda, but it is not the one that is being publicly shown off because these people in charge there are saying one thing and doing another.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 12:22 1

73. snowgator (Posts: 3209; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


Nero, an emperor that was considered a near deity as be set on the thrown with only minor controls from the Senate at the time, is not a good comparison to Mr. Elop. I think anyone that thinks he made these moves without total approval from the Nokia Board who hired him is not applying the checks and balances of major corporations. Within months of his hire, Symbian was killed. You don't think that came up in the interview? He was totally honest with Nokia execs. Be bad to be. They stockpiled resources to be prepared for the transition to a different OS, which he was upfront in many stockholders meetings interviews would be a hard process. Bit, the controlled burn analogy is a great one, because markets dictated to Nokia they had to change. This was not Mr. Elop decision, the market and precious CEO's and company decision decided it for him. HOW it is being done is his decision, and he will be held accountable for those decisions. But Nokia had to change.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 12:35 1

75. snowgator (Posts: 3209; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


Wow. A ton of grammar problems in there. I might thumb myself down. Do not know what happened.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 13:01

81. hepresearch (unregistered)


Haha... no worries, I will have mercy... lol!

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 13:00 2

80. hepresearch (unregistered)


I agree Nokia had to change, but I don't like the method. I did not mean to compare Elop to Nero on a personal level, but I wanted to highlight the behavior similarity... turning to the controlled burn with little warning or heads-up to the customers or common shareholders, and at their quite obvious expense. Instead of gently and gradually working it out in the public view over the course of a couple years, it was announced by Elop all-at-once in a mass-media event, and the results were fairly instant, with continuing ramifications only getting worse over the year that followed. I thought that they would be beginning to enter stable territory, but as soon as a little down news comes out, amplified by Elop announcing his "disappointment", their stock takes another 16% hit in a single session opening. This controlled burn is being kept going past its needfulness, for what reason I am not sure.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 12:25 1

74. remixfa (Posts: 13905; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


wow, thats a dark conspiracy comparison.

what MS and Nokia are doing is very public, its just not all together. you have to find the pieces and put it together from different snippits.

If this venture fails.. and it wont.. you will see MS offering to buy Nokia as penance. It wouldnt surprise me if thats a clause in their partnership really.

What you have is Nokia on one knee kissing the ring of microsoft forming a marraige that is strong enough to make headroom with the competition. alone, neither one of them had a chance. What they are doing is destroying what is left of the old empire and building a new on on top...
so yea, i guess the nero bit plays in actually.. just not so.. evil. lol

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 13:05 2

82. hepresearch (unregistered)


It may look like they just don't have it together... they would probably want us to think that... but I don't buy it. Evil quite possibly, but then again, we're just talking about stuff. Nero killed people... definitely evil. At best, Elop just applied too much medicine way too fast... and at worst, he is conspiring with somebody to manufacture the situation... but either way, he certainly isn't killing anybody. So, evil is debatable here, and a minor market material offense at the worst. Yeah, not so bad as Nero... but like I said, this is the same TYPE of behavior, but with only potential economic victimization instead of the taking of life.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 08:53 2

23. ryq24 (Posts: 499; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


go to any malls and you will notice that there are many people inside samsung store while at nokia store, most of the clerk are just standing waiting for customers to come in. nokia should quickly roll out their windows phone and they should have one lumia phone in each category just like what samsung has done. from high end like galaxy s2 to the low end like galaxy champ.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 08:58 5

24. remixfa (Posts: 13905; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


they do that already

900 (high), 800 (middle upper), 710(middle), and they are now launching the prepaid capable 610.

:)

people just need to be patient. they are rebuilding an empire in an era of extreme competition. Its not going to happen over night. Apple revitalized the industry with the iphone and android has taken it to new heights that iOS never will. It takes a hot minute to be the new guy and get noticed.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 09:41

38. Glim12808 (Posts: 393; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


Any news on how the HTC Radar is doing at TMO?

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 09:50 2

40. remixfa (Posts: 13905; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


it stopped selling the moment the 710 came out. There was no point. Nokia kept the price on the 710 lower, while the specs were higher, and it came with free nokia maps & drive which is a huge selling point. the radar has zero advantages over the nokia.

And thats exactly what people need to realize is nokia's game. they are going to undercut and outperform other WP7 makers until they are the vast majority of WP7 phones (which wont take long..lol). Then they will continue until the brand reaches a level of recognition and market share that they can safely raise prices on par with android and iOS.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 10:06 1

48. Glim12808 (Posts: 393; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


That's sad to hear. The Radar is my 1st WP device and I love it. But yes you're right. Nokia is going to dominate WP. Nokia will be to WP as Samsung is to Android. I can live with that.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 10:26 1

54. remixfa (Posts: 13905; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


if you go to XDA and root it, you can get nokia maps & drive on the device, which will put it nearly on par with the 710. I have them running perfectly on my old HD7

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 09:01

27. Bluesky02 (Posts: 1439; Member since: 05 Dec 2011)


Symbian will fell, more bad news in the future. Why?
: because nokia is slowing ditching it to make place for Windows Phone and Low end windows Phone
Moreover Android smartphone is getting cheaper.
Expect good news from Nokia next year.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 10:04 1

46. redmd (Posts: 892; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


I wish Nokia the very best this year and they will recover. however, I won't be buying Nokia windows phone at the moment. SGS3 here I come. btw, there's no such thing as galaxy champ. its galaxy y or Samsung champ.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 10:17

49. kamejoko (Posts: 108; Member since: 10 Nov 2011)


Q4 2011 + Q1 2012 = 3M (all wp7 (low cost + medium cost) of nokia) .
Q4 2011 + Q1 2012 = 5M (Galaxy Note (high cost) of SS).

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 11:44 2

66. mobilefuture (Posts: 206; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)


After reading alot of comments on quite a few recent nokia articles i's good to know that nokia supporters still exist. In my locality everybody downs nokia soo much and i tell them just wait and see. Only one guy is like me in my locality. NOKIA FTW!!!!!!!!!

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 12:56 1

79. stipe (Posts: 33; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)


Slowly but safely !!! YOu gonna succeed , Nokia !!!

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 18:44

90. SemperFiV12 (Posts: 761; Member since: 09 Nov 2010)


As it has been said before... for any company in such a heavy transitional period, a loss is expected. This loss has been further escalated due to the economic downturn in Europe and the US.

Given the circumstances 2 million is a hefty amount that should encourage Nokia and MSFT a bit. An OS cannot gain traction with the flip of a switch, and timing and efforts have been a bit misconstrued on part of Microsoft.

I can see the Windows Phone platform and manufacturers that use the OS gaining serious steam by first half of 2013. Of course things are currently looking hotter and hotter for the WP platform with the Marketplace expanding, specs being higher-ed with each update, the frequency and effectiveness of updates, and added models by manufacturers.

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 20:51 1

91. ZetanAlaz (Posts: 14; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)


yeah Nokia.. I'm waiting for you... I think it's not that bad for Nokia.. maybe 2012 will be a tough year for Nokia, but they will show how powerful is WP.. it's started with 2 million, maybe on Q4, they can sell up to 20 million?? who knows, let the war begins..

posted on 11 Apr 2012, 21:55 2

92. snowgator (Posts: 3209; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)


A ton of great comments and ideas in this thread. Even those that disagreed were civil. (Hope you took no offense to my use of humor, @Apple Conspiracy. Meant no disrespect.). Love these types of threads. I learn a ton!!

posted on 12 Apr 2012, 06:02

93. FoneAddict (Posts: 204; Member since: 05 Jul 2011)


This marks the beginning of the end for Nokia.

Stephen Elop I hope you are proud of what you have achieved at Nokia.

posted on 16 Apr 2012, 04:25

94. Jerzy (Posts: 3; Member since: 16 Apr 2012)


OEM Speed Radar
The amazing activated radar is mostly used by the drivers to have a better control over their speed. When you cross the speed limit and break the law, the radar installed in your vehicle will alarm you and helps you to reduce the speed. It helps to avoid accidents due to over speed.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories