Nokia Lumia 720 shows all, inside and out to the FCC, AT&T to get the first run?
0. phoneArena 06 Mar 2013, 21:11 posted on
The new Lumia 720 may be a middle-weight in the realm of smartphones, but it made a big splash at MWC...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)
Nice device nokia but dont like the white phone color
14. asseek (Posts: 164; Member since: 12 Sep 2012)
thumbing u down, just because u don't like the white color? lol
2. Landmarkcm (Posts: 497; Member since: 11 Aug 2009)
Ill gladly take one unlocked to use on Tmobile monthly. Don't know why tmobile didn't go directly for this instead of the junky 521 which doesn't even have a flash on the camera. Yet they advertise the camera lenses etc on the 521 but it's gonna be pretty useless in low light.
3. Ruckus (Posts: 286; Member since: 20 Oct 2011)
Its a nice entry level phone but no LTE? Thats crazy..
5. UrbanPhantom (Posts: 949; Member since: 30 Oct 2012)
It's a developing world phone, and LTE is still rare in most 3rd world nations
9. Marcus_h (Posts: 44; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
Yes -and LTE has only very recently been rolled out in places like the UK
4. N-fanboy (Posts: 543; Member since: 12 Jan 2013)
The 4th best camera on a smartphone out there... After the 808pureview, Lumia920, and the Htc one but still mid range
7. Sterijoana (Posts: 32; Member since: 18 Feb 2013)
Do some research, boy. It's camera is better than HTC one.
8. nightmare (Posts: 28; Member since: 25 Nov 2011)
The 720 is a nice phone but nokia will ruin its success if thats how they will sell it off contract.Its almost the same price as the galaxy s3 will be soon after s4 is launched!!! Nokia cant compete with s3 unless they fix that price
13. -box- (Posts: 3984; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)
If it's around $200-300 off-contract, and the S3 drops to around $500 from its current $700 (MSRP) that's still a huge difference.
10. Marcus_h (Posts: 44; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)
If LTE isn't a consideration, this is nicer than the 820 I think - lighter, thinner, and the camera appears better (less MP, but better f-stop, and BSI which I don't think the 820 is).
11. -box- (Posts: 3984; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)
If it's the same as the international version (no LTE), then I would imagine this would be for AT&T's prepaid GoPhone service, rather than a contract device. Great choice, if so, since it offers a better camera than the 900 or 820 and the same screen tech as its 920 sibling.
Also, this AT&T getting first-dibs is really frustrating. T-Mobile is the only carrier to offer a Nokia continuously, even during Nokia's darker time a few years ago, yet they get the mid-tier offerings. And buying the international version or an unlocked AT&T unit isn't great either since the 1900MHz band isn't widely deployed.