Nokia Lumia 635 launched in the UK, it's not as cheap as you'd expect
0. phoneArena 02 Jul 2014, 12:38 posted on
The new Lumia 635 runs the latest Windows Phone 8.1, but for now it doesn't offer Cortana for UK users...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. UglyFrank (Posts: 366; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)
We are used to getting screwed over anyway, I would gladly pay $649 for a flagship at launch,
2. XperiaFanZone (Posts: 1188; Member since: 21 Sep 2012)
Everything is expensive here. The 16GB Nexus 5 I bought from the Play Store is £300. But it's worth it, considering that other flagship phones cost over £550.
3. fzacek (Posts: 1379; Member since: 26 Jan 2014)
This phone should be priced about the same as the Moto E...
5. fzacek (Posts: 1379; Member since: 26 Jan 2014)
Its specs are about on par with the Moto E...
7. oboboy14 (Posts: 45; Member since: 27 Mar 2014)
Specs aren't the only thing though. There's more than that that plays into the price of cell phones.
6. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3071; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)
The Moto G LTE costs £159. Just saying.
8. NokiaFTW (limited) (Posts: 1900; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)
If you read the article carefully, you'll see that the L635 (which is the LTE version) cost 129 or 149 pounds depending where you buy it in the UK. So that's about 10 to 30 pounds less. Not only that, the 635 has a removable battery and supports MicroSD cards of up to 128 gigs, not to mention the guaranteed 3 year software support from Microsoft. In any case, both of these phones are a great buy at those prices.
9. true1984 (Posts: 586; Member since: 23 May 2012)
the moto g lte DOES support micro sd though. so chill
11. NokiaFTW (limited) (Posts: 1900; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)
Did I say that it didn't? It doesn't support sd cards of 128 gigs, which the L635 does. That's what I pointed out. So chill...
13. sgodsell (Posts: 1044; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)
Well considering the Moto G LTE also has a superior display compared to the Lumia 630/635 with a resolution of 1280x720. Not to mention all the other features on the moto G that are missing on the 630/635. The moto G has a rear camera flash, front facing camera, light sensor, water resistant, slow motion video capture. All of which are missing from the 630/635. So for the 10 to 30 pounds more. Its worth it to get the Moto G.
15. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3071; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)
Do you have a clue what you're talking about? Moto G offers much better 720p display and 1gb ram... Which eclipses your removable battery and 128gb sd card. Also who knows, Moto G might support 128gb cards.... My Galaxy S2 was said to support 32gb card only but 64gb worked like a charm.
18. elitewolverine (Posts: 1363; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)
On one carrier the 635 is 50% off with a 4g plan...just saying...
12. Landmarkcm (Posts: 419; Member since: 11 Aug 2009)
I just got the Moto G LTE as I had broke my other Moto G. Their both good, But if you can go with the LTE version. I like having the choice of the white color now too. This lumia had a chance to compete in that space and failed.
14. Liveitup (Posts: 1063; Member since: 07 Jan 2014)
The attack of the lumias. Glad to see more WP devices, competition is healthy for the consumer.
17. sabretigger (Posts: 21; Member since: 15 Sep 2012)
It's a s**t phone for stupid chavs who are more impressed with the range of colours. I would know, I worked for cpw.