x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Nokia Lumia 1520 is first with assertive display: watch it easily beat Galaxy Note 3's screen

0. phoneArena 24 Oct 2013, 06:18 posted on

Nokia unveiled its first phablet, the Lumia 1520, two days ago and one of its key features is the sharp and vibrant 6-inch 1080 x 1920 pixel screen…

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 06:54 1

14. SAYED-EJAZ (Posts: 225; Member since: 10 Oct 2013)

+1 for your comment.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 07:24 14

23. GeekMovement (Posts: 2156; Member since: 09 Sep 2011)

True it can't beat Samsung in features (no one can lol), but it sure has 32gb standard + micro sd slot, the big beautiful screen, massive battery, slim design, and a smooth wp os experience with lots of nokia bonuses.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 07:43 9

28. Beijendorf (Posts: 340; Member since: 27 Aug 2013)

Don't forget built-in wireless charging for once!

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 07:57 11

35. x_maly_x (Posts: 72; Member since: 01 Jun 2013)

Everyone have more features as Samsung....Samsung it's just marketing.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 08:42 1

48. HouTexan (Posts: 439; Member since: 08 Jan 2012)

Oh, really? smh

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 08:51 6

51. PapaSmurf (Posts: 10457; Member since: 14 May 2012)

S-Pen alone is a reason the Note 3 is above all other phablets on the market.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 08:59 20

53. taikucing (unregistered)

No manufacturer can beat Samsung in gimmicky bloatwares

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 10:40 3

71. hboy857 (Posts: 349; Member since: 03 Jun 2013)

+100 for you.

posted on 25 Oct 2013, 08:39 1

112. Suts_97 (Posts: 124; Member since: 05 May 2012)

Bro I logged in just to like your comment, well said and summed up in one simple sentence! Thumbs up for you! :)

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 09:07 15

56. akki20892 (Posts: 3901; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)

features? now u getting wrong.
1520 still can beat note 3 in this features damn it:
Screen: Puremotion HD+, 60hz refresh rate, clear black, sensitive, and assertive. + same gorilla glass but all lumia do stronger glass wait for drop and distruction test.
Body: one piece strong polycarbonate
Camera: pureview, 20MP with dual led flash
Built in: Wireless Charging
Application: Full MS Office
Battery: 3400 mAh
Maps: Free Nokia Navigation + Map.

Note 3 advantage:
Stylus, 3gb ram, removable battery, customization and android.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 11:47 3

82. Wiki_jaan (Posts: 704; Member since: 24 Jun 2012)

dont forget
is lighter (168g)
4k video

but nokia 1520 is also a good phablet

posted on 25 Oct 2013, 16:28

114. zeķīte (Posts: 3; Member since: 28 Dec 2011)

IT cant be clearblack, if it is IPS LCD. :D clearblack=almoned
lcd= TFT, IPS, RETINA and other marketing gimics, that means the same, but just updated tech. purewiev camera also means nothing, if you would write aparature, minimal focal distance, sensor size and tech, that would mean something.

posted on 26 Oct 2013, 06:22 1

115. o7o (Posts: 111; Member since: 26 Jun 2009)

Actually, it IS ClearBlack. ClearBlack is independent of the technology of the screen itself.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 07:15 10

22. tadaa (Posts: 267; Member since: 18 Apr 2013)

if you look at it from a different perspective, pa may have seen the note 3's display as a benchmark for other displays to beat.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 09:37 1

65. solomonsteve (Posts: 76; Member since: 19 Dec 2012)

Good point

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 10:45

74. user996 (Posts: 215; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)

it is so as samsung says note 3 has best ever amoled panel

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 07:41 5

27. Beijendorf (Posts: 340; Member since: 27 Aug 2013)

Clearly you neither read the text nor did you watch the video. The article writer noted that in this screen test the Nokia easily beat the Samsung - something a flippin ant could see and rationally reach the conclusion of.

He also noted that he can't wait to see if it holds up in one of their own tests.

In other words, preliminary results look very promising, let's see if it lasts. If you don't think that's unbiased then I don't think you know what that word means.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 09:36 1

64. turk_az (Posts: 40; Member since: 11 May 2012)

look at this links and you will know what's going on here
w w w . uploadax.com/images/31812181538753597985.jpg

and the source link:
w w w .wpcentral.com/supersized-face-nokia-lumia-1520-ag​ainst-galaxy-note-3-and-xperia-z-ultra

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 06:31 7

4. joey_sfb (Posts: 5819; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)

Screen and custom software. Nokia has a problem giving a honest demo.

Last round was faking camera footage taken from a SLR camera to be their new phone now faking the screen demo.

Well, it does not matter windows 8 phone is not a good buy yet at least for me.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 09:55 7

69. bon24x7 (Posts: 206; Member since: 30 Aug 2012)

Nokia is the best in Display and Camera (808 and 1020) without a doubt. Give credit where its due instead of trolling.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 10:48 5

75. user996 (Posts: 215; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)

it was taken with DSLR but they proved that video taken with 920 was as stable as DSLR's so your point is pointless :))

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 19:49 3

101. -box- (Posts: 3991; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)

You've been on this site long enough to know that NOKIA didn't make that ad, it was an ad agency they hired, and no where did it say it was the 920's camera in use.

You can troll harder, or get your facts straight and stop trying to find fault for no reason

posted on 25 Oct 2013, 01:24

110. joey_sfb (Posts: 5819; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)

Defending Nokia to the bitter end... Or should we start calling it Microsoft phone.

posted on 25 Oct 2013, 01:36

111. joey_sfb (Posts: 5819; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)

I buy what ever that gives me top value and right now that is Samsung which happens to be the world top selling brand.

Truthfully i am grateful for Nokia fans for holding the fort. Competition gives Samsung the motivation needed to offer customers like me value for our purchase. Thank you.

posted on 29 Oct 2013, 08:40 1

116. sbw44 (Posts: 433; Member since: 04 Dec 2012)

Lmao Samsung top value? when last did samsung make a well built, gorgeous looking, premium phone?????

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 06:34 10

5. _Bone_ (Posts: 2154; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)

Fail. Adapt Screen is not turned on for the Note 3.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 08:54 6

52. taikucing (unregistered)

Do you watch the video? He says he uses max brightness in Note 3. It's the same. The adapt screen will set the brightness to max if the screen is exposed to sunlight.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 10:42 4

73. redmd (Posts: 1270; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)

No its not the same. Max brightness in Adapt Screen is brighter than the manual Max brightness. Displaymate found that one out.

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 10:50 2

76. user996 (Posts: 215; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)

manual an auto max brightness are same

posted on 24 Oct 2013, 15:01 3

95. livyatan (Posts: 867; Member since: 19 Jun 2013)

NO, there's a HUGE difference between manual maximum and auto maximum brightness.. it's less than 400 nits in manual, and exceptionally high 660 nits in auto mode.
This is the expert analysis which confirmed that:


..and I can attest to it from my personal experience - the outdoor visibility is vastly superior in auto mode.
Really a major difference.

Not to put down Nokia's display here which is amazing, but this article and the test are simply not correct, which is downright inexcusable.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories