New batteries to recharge in seconds?!
Share:
Lithium-ion batteries are widely used in consumer electronics, such as handsets, laptops and so on, but they have a significant drawback - long charge times. However, Gerbrand Ceder, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and his colleagues used a computer simulation to examine how ions and electrons move in a different environment, which is a variant of the standard lithium-ion material, called lithium iron phosphate. The test has showed that the ions are moving really fast in the new environment, but there was a problem, related to how ions pass through the material.
It seems like this new technology is worth researching, since lithium iron phosphate is also cheaper. Until now, standard lithium cobalt batteries have been paid more attention, because of their ability to pack more power for a certain weight. But we are also aware that they as well lose their capacity to charge over time, which isn’t the case with lithium iron phosphate. Moreover, the actual changes in the manufacturing process should be relatively few, so we might really see the new batteries in two or three years.
source: BBCNews
Share:
7 Comments
1. westbank504 posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:42 0 0
be nice to charge my phone and have a full battery in 5 mins instead of 5 hours
2. filteroff posted on 13 Mar 2009, 08:01 0 0
Well sure it charges quick... there is a draw back. It discharges just as quick as it charges.
3. idiotwind13 posted on 13 Mar 2009, 11:43 0 0
Yeah, because this would even be news if the batteries discharged in 5 minutes after charging for five minutes... seriously, think before you post, what theyre saying is it can charge for just a few minutes and get the equivalent to a full battery charge. As in three hours talk time, a week of standby.
4. Big Red posted on 13 Mar 2009, 12:57 0 0
OH MY GOD. These articles are painful to read. This particular one is the English language's worse nightmare. I demand Phonearena issue a formal apology to the English language. This is the worse case of butchery the language has seen since George W. Bush.
5. Fanboys Suck posted on 13 Mar 2009, 15:01 0 0
"worst"... I hesitate to even state that because depending on what context this is in, both could be correct. However, in this context, it would be "worst". Sorry for pointing that out :)
7. Fanboys Suck posted on 13 Mar 2009, 18:47 0 0
Hey, I've done it too... Point out some crappy grammatical or spelling error, and then screwed up what I was typing. Haha! I guess so, chalk it up!








