x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






New Motorola Moto E images and specs revealed, colorful Moto Shells included

0. phoneArena 10 May 2014, 06:08 posted on

We can now take a look at lots of renders that show the upcoming Moto E, which is expected to be Motorola's next low-cost Android smartphone...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 10 May 2014, 06:14 12

1. dil2abu (Posts: 305; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)


Even this is gonna rock like Moto G in sales..

posted on 10 May 2014, 06:58 8

9. vincelongman (Posts: 4576; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)


Its rumored to be $99, which would be great value for money
Hopefully this means Lenovo is letting the Moto team continue their good work

posted on 10 May 2014, 07:30 13

12. RaKithAPeiRiZ (Posts: 1488; Member since: 29 Dec 2011)


this is bad news for the Nokia x

posted on 10 May 2014, 10:08 3

25. ihavenoname (Posts: 1693; Member since: 18 Aug 2013)


Sorry Nokia(M$).
When we have Moto E and 520, Nokia X is useless.
When we have Moto G and 630, Nokia XL is useless.

posted on 10 May 2014, 16:39

45. sgodsell (Posts: 3898; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)


The 52x do not have dual Sims. The 630/635 is still not released yet. Only the 630 will have dual Sims. Remember Android is still selling hundreds of millions of smart phones every quarter (240 million Q1, 2014). Microsoft and Nokia needed to get something into the users hands in emerging markets and it had to be inexpensive and support dual Sims. Everyone knows Microsoft and WP is still playing catch up to Android. So if you looked at the specs of the Nokia X then you would know WP 8 would not even run on a cortex-A5/A7 which is currently running in the Nokia X devices. Also WP 8 never supported on screen buttons or dual Sims, both of which the Nokia X devices once again have. So it was easier for Microsoft and Nokia to just take Android and add a UI that resembles WP and can run Microsoft's existing apps and services. Microsoft already has a number of apps for Android already.
Now you know why Microsoft did what they did. The project name for it was called project Normandy. Microsoft and Nokia felt like they had to stem the growth of Android, because it keeps growing every quarter. Also the moto G is better then any lumia 5xx, 6xx, 7xx, 8xx device hands down.

posted on 10 May 2014, 11:12 2

29. NokiaFTW (Posts: 2072; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)


Nokia should have never released an Android phone. I always was and always will be against a Nokia & Android collaboration. WP as a whole suites the colorful Lumia line up of Nokia. They should release WPs with even lower prices as this will help them increase their already significant presence in emerging markets.

posted on 10 May 2014, 11:44 1

31. sprockkets (Posts: 1611; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)


That's just it - they can't.

Imagine that? WP is too expensive even for the old nokia.

Now that the license fee is free, that changes. But of course, MS owns that division, so that doesn't really change anything either.

posted on 10 May 2014, 16:52 1

46. sgodsell (Posts: 3898; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)


My god you are blaming Nokia for the Nokia X. Let's go with that. Nokia never made any Android smartphone all this time until they announced one this February at MWC. Nokia said for our first android phone we will put the lowest spec cortex-A5 CPU in it with only 512mb of ram, 4gb of storage, a poor 800x480 LCD display, a UI that resembles WP, and no Google apps and services, only Microsoft's. As if Microsoft wasn't 100% behind the Nokia X. Because Microsoft's strict Hardware and software controls for WP bit Microsoft right in the butt. WP couldn't run or be supported on low hardware until WP8.1. Even then they still have strict hardware controls and only support Qualcomm CPUs still.

posted on 10 May 2014, 16:35 1

43. Killua (Posts: 270; Member since: 25 Nov 2013)


Nokia X is already bad enough, and now this. LOL.

posted on 10 May 2014, 17:59

49. Jinto (Posts: 436; Member since: 15 Jan 2014)


No front snapper?

posted on 10 May 2014, 18:00

50. Jinto (Posts: 436; Member since: 15 Jan 2014)


Dat pink moto logo...

posted on 10 May 2014, 06:16 5

2. nazyr1803 (Posts: 91; Member since: 11 Jan 2013)


waiting for it. i want to buy this for my father!!

posted on 10 May 2014, 06:22 5

3. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


Looks a lot better than white. I hate White bezeled phones.

posted on 10 May 2014, 06:23 6

4. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


Hope moto gets this one right like G and X.

posted on 10 May 2014, 09:10 2

22. jroc74 (Posts: 6015; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


Well they took steps forwards and backwards.

No front camera....but sd card support...

Dual core chip...

If its priced even lower or the same as the G, it will do fine with sales.

posted on 10 May 2014, 11:16 1

30. NokiaFTW (Posts: 2072; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)


IMO the Lumia 525 or 620 are better than the Moto E based on the rumours. However, the Moto G & the L630/635 are pretty closely matched. Both have distinct advantages over the other.

posted on 10 May 2014, 11:10 1

28. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


P.S. I think this would end up as India exclusive. Also i have a feeling that this one has front facing stereo speakers.

posted on 10 May 2014, 11:52 3

33. corporateJP (Posts: 2431; Member since: 28 Nov 2009)


Confirmed for not only India, but South America and Asia as well. It is listed in America Movil's database also, so it more than likely will show up in Mexico and Central America, possibly come to the U.S. on one of their eight MVNO's. I could see Aio/Cricket and Boost/Virgin pick it up, it would only make sense.

You dig, Phil Brooks?

posted on 10 May 2014, 12:00

35. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


Just an assumption bro. :-)

posted on 10 May 2014, 12:02 1

36. bon24x7 (Posts: 206; Member since: 30 Aug 2012)


Of course it'll be exclusive to India as it got leaked in Brazil..We all know Brazil is in India..

posted on 10 May 2014, 12:28

38. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


Yeah you gonna kill me for that? Just read the flipkart news on gsmarena so i thought it would be exclusive...

posted on 10 May 2014, 12:49

41. NokiaFTW (Posts: 2072; Member since: 24 Oct 2012)


All Motorola smartphones will be exclusive to Flipkart in India. Only Flipkart will sell Motorola smartphones in India, no other retailer can.

posted on 10 May 2014, 06:32 7

5. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)


Not bad...looks simple, chubby and colorful. Not bad at all.

Hope it's $80 or maybe near that price, sometimes miracle can happen right? Make it possible, Motorola.

posted on 10 May 2014, 07:01 2

10. fireblade (Posts: 717; Member since: 27 Dec 2013)


probably about $150. But still better than any cheap phones from Samsung, LG, Sony & HTC.
The good thing is it's not mediatek crap

posted on 10 May 2014, 08:34 5

16. VZWuser76 (Posts: 4489; Member since: 04 Mar 2010)


I think it'll be less than $150, that's about what the Moto G was going for, and this is supposed to undercut that. My guess is $80 to $100 range, and will compete directly with the Nokia X line.

posted on 10 May 2014, 12:40

40. hurrycanger (Posts: 1574; Member since: 01 Dec 2013)


$150 will be too much imo.
The Moto G starts from $179, and some carrier in the US offers it for $100 to 130 off contract and includes the charger.
This Moto E offers a lot less than the Moto G, including screen size, look, front camera, flash, and a slower processor.

posted on 10 May 2014, 06:33

6. ScottSchneider (Posts: 334; Member since: 06 Dec 2011)


PA.. Ya'll sleep on Saturdays and Sundays... I saw this news in GSMA and was not able to open the photos... Been waiting here for more than an hour for you guys to post it here.. Bytheway.. Thx...

posted on 10 May 2014, 09:08 3

21. Florin.T (Posts: 233; Member since: 16 Dec 2013)


Hey, we're only human (maybe o.o ).

posted on 10 May 2014, 09:10 2

23. StraightEdgeNexus (Posts: 3689; Member since: 14 Feb 2014)


Lol. but whats the real reason for slow day at weekends?

posted on 10 May 2014, 11:48

32. ScottSchneider (Posts: 334; Member since: 06 Dec 2011)


If GSMA is from the east n you are from the west, I do understand the time delay... But wat happened to news round the clock...? O.o

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories