National Geographic uses a Nokia Lumia 1020 to get some truly amazing images
8. james004 (Posts: 486; Member since: 15 May 2013)
microsoft isnt buying nokia anytime soon so they better start using android.
20. ihatesmartphone (unregistered)
You're lost!! XD
38. gazmatic (Posts: 659; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)
How does it feel being wrong?
if you want Nokia with Android then go look for newkia
it's going to flop so hard because people like you won't buy it
9. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 3193; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)
Great shots indeed!!
I saw it on wpcentral and was awe-inspired!
A 'brick' in a fools hand is a great tool to a professional.
15. akki20892 (Posts: 3798; Member since: 04 Feb 2013)
Stunning shots....Mazinggggg photos.....Nokia u doing well with national geographic. Perfect phone to take great photos and it's tough too for rough journey, Perfect phone for national geographic.
19. ihatesmartphone (unregistered)
I really want this phone :(
28. Pedro0x (Posts: 271; Member since: 19 Oct 2012)
Have you tried to zoom in to those photos? They are full of noise.
29. DontHateOnS60 (Posts: 864; Member since: 20 Apr 2009)
They're full resolution shots. 34MP. Those shots are never going to be noise free. The only other phone that has a chance in hell of doing better is the 808 PureView.
30. Pedro0x (Posts: 271; Member since: 19 Oct 2012)
Yeah, ofcourse, I know but I thought that it would be much better but it looks hidious in full res. And that guy in video must be stupid because how can he ditch a pro DLSR camera for this?! I would understand if he had a little camera for 100 dollars.
37. clevername (Posts: 1435; Member since: 11 Jul 2008)
the noise free super high res photos are zoomed post snap. zoom while taking the pic and you see noise. snap a pic then zoom, and you'll be able to zoom more than any other cam phone, and its clear as can be.
2. Gadgety (Posts: 150; Member since: 03 Sep 2012)
"It is one of, if not the best camera that you can find on a smartphone." One of...and the competitors are?
16. alterecho (Posts: 1096; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)
1020's predecessor, Nokia 808 Pureview.
17. cam-whore (Posts: 164; Member since: 21 Feb 2013)
that is right, there is just no competition....
3. gazmatic (Posts: 659; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)
Why didn't you link the video?
the video is the real treat
22. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)
I agree that it is nice advertisement and that Nokia Lumia 1020 has the best camera compared to the other smartphones, but again, it is ADVERTISEMENT and in my oiinion all those talks which compares Nokia Lumia 1020 with DSLR is just a bulls**t!
23. papss (unregistered)
If you are going to call bull on this then you need to call all comments by any third party bull. No need to troll and I expected more from you.
6. PapaSmurf (Posts: 9884; Member since: 14 May 2012)
Holy s---. I was never crazed about Nokia, but this just changed all of that. I kind of want a L1020 on T-Mobile now....
7. carlos2121 (Posts: 1; Member since: 29 Aug 2013)
Video and Photos Lumia 1020 Beautiful Beautiful Beautiful :)
12. papss (unregistered)
Wow I've never seen that video.. I can't believe some of the zoomed views.
11. papss (unregistered)
Wow that's crazy good. I've taken amazing photos with mine but this guy clearly knows what he is doing.
13. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 7043; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)
Now those are beautiful shots NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC/NOKIA.
14. pwnarena (Posts: 1049; Member since: 15 Feb 2013)
aren't the photos too grainy or is that what the nokia representative called "beautiful noise"?
the noise becomes very pronounced up close. still, they look great.
18. Antonyjoseph (Posts: 216; Member since: 06 Apr 2013)
I be been going crazy ever since I saw this on WP. The problem is one should know to use the features like that NG professional. I wish Nokia would also include a some kind of booklet for photograph dummies (like me) on how to use the features.
24. papss (unregistered)
They do. They have a tutorial built into the phone that goes over it extensively.
21. Nokfan1603 (Posts: 26; Member since: 13 Mar 2013)
To the author of this article: It is simply amazing that even a professional photographer of the National Geographic is really impressed with the Lumia 1020; a one of a kind phone. The pictures are stunning. You cannot achieve this kind of result with any other smartphone (maybe the 808). Why is it, that you have to put so many negatives in this article? E.g.: marketing strategy, OS, questioning the truthfulness of the photographer's opinion about the device... The contrary happens in Phone Arena's articles about iphone or Moto X, where everything is positive and weaknesses are turned into strengths. Probably, you do not like Nokia Lumia and even less Windows Phone, nevertheless from a professional, I would appreciate more objectivity. This comes from a Nokia Lumia fan who also likes Windows Phone.
25. papss (unregistered)
Don't hold your breath sir.. This is a blogging site which means they give their personal opinion versus any professional editorial. If you want less personal opinion you will have to go elsewhere.
32. sergiobr (Posts: 586; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)
I follow this blog, and I know a lot of serious people that post comments there. True professionals papss.
33. papss (unregistered)
I'm talking about the bloggers that write articles on this site, not the folks who comment.
35. Penny (Posts: 1477; Member since: 04 Feb 2011)
Honestly, I didn't even read the article (went straight to the pictures) until you pointed this out, and I agree. So many bloggers seem to express 'surprise' when something goes right with a Windows Phone, but then quickly negate it with a "however, this is why you should still be skeptical about getting this device..." spiel.
31. sergiobr (Posts: 586; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)
Why don´t you search for professional opinions ???http://connect.dpreview.com/po
st/5588168824/nokia-lumia-1020-natgeo?utm_campaign=internal-link&utm_source=news-list&utm_medium=text&ref=title... 80% more or less said "noisy ... pictures not acceptable ... 808 pureview is much better... Horrible Pixel Quality... unsharp... a fair bit of publicity...bad set of photos, etc." The pictures in 5Mpx is the best FOR PHONES ! Just it ! nothing special ! As I allways says ... (did you hear it papss ?) My 808 (cheaper) for photos and my S3 by NFC for the rest ! True photos ? Sony Rx100 _0_2?news
34. papss (unregistered)
Wow nice search and link lol You can have your 808 with its zero support and your laughable s3. Lol s3...geez that cracks me up. I'll take my 1020 any day of the week over either of those but if you can't afford something made this year and you need to justify yourself be my guest.
36. sergiobr (Posts: 586; Member since: 25 Feb 2013)
My S3 is the best think I purchased until now, NEVER stop. 808 is just for photos, the rest ... horrible ! If you want to buy 1020 and waste your money in wp be my guest too ! Now I understand what you mean by "justify" ! lol