x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options

Motorola turns down Microsoft's royalty offer, decides to keep $100 million bond

0. phoneArena 19 Jun 2013, 19:07 posted on

Back in April, in Seattle, U.S. District Judge James Robart ruled that Microsoft should pay Motorola only $1.8 million a year as a royalty payment to use Motorola's standards-essential patents; these are patents that a company cannot avoid using to build a specific device. Negotiations over licensing is supposed to be done in a "Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory" fashion, hence they are called FRAND patents...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 19 Jun 2013, 19:18 10

1. InspectorGadget80 (unregistered)

Motorola shows u WHO'S BOSS M$

posted on 19 Jun 2013, 19:24 2

2. thecorrescode (Posts: 34; Member since: 28 Mar 2013)

Alan F is starting to become Florian Mueller...

posted on 19 Jun 2013, 20:04 1

4. MartyK (Posts: 732; Member since: 11 Apr 2012)

He has always been Florian Mueller little brother...this shouldn't surprise anyone who has ever read any article of his...smh

posted on 19 Jun 2013, 22:36 2

6. flynfree (Posts: 374; Member since: 09 Jun 2013)

Good newsssss! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

posted on 19 Jun 2013, 23:47 4

7. Sniggly (Posts: 7296; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)

Global sales of the Xbox line alone since its inception have been 100 million worldwide. Not including Windows Phone sales, Microsoft basically just offered to pay 7 cents per device it sells using Motorola's technology.

This is the same company that's more than happy to collect 15 DOLLARS per device, or 21,000% of what it offered Motorola, from HTC and Samsung each for the use of ITS patents.

In other words, Microsoft can go screw itself.

posted on 20 Jun 2013, 00:41 2

8. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 7701; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)

I thought this fell under the notion of being a FRAND patent? I think that was a little too generous of an offer to Motorola.

posted on 20 Jun 2013, 02:28 1

10. Sniggly (Posts: 7296; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)

Because you misunderstand what FRAND is supposed to be. You think that FRAND patents should be licensed for free.

posted on 20 Jun 2013, 12:43

14. jacko1977 (Posts: 428; Member since: 11 Feb 2012)

just like apple and the ruling of 1billion overpay for FRAND patent's

posted on 20 Jun 2013, 00:57 3

9. Meleagru (Posts: 91; Member since: 03 Dec 2012)

Is Motorola appealing the ruling? Because otherwise what they are doing seems borderline illegal.

posted on 20 Jun 2013, 04:18 1

11. jibraihimi (Posts: 720; Member since: 29 Nov 2011)

Greed hurts self in long run......

posted on 20 Jun 2013, 05:57 2

12. volcano (Posts: 281; Member since: 25 Jan 2013)

go home motorola you are drunk

posted on 20 Jun 2013, 08:31

13. techguyone (Posts: 158; Member since: 18 May 2013)

What Sniggly said was right - if it's good for the goose it's good for the gander, regardless of MxyTroll's views.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories