Motorola Moto X first camera samples showdown
0. phoneArena 01 Aug 2013, 15:49 posted on
Being the newcomer and all, we’re all curious to see how the Moto X fares when it comes to snapping quality photos with its 10-megapixel Clear Pixel camera. Who knows if the technology behind it actually all come together to produce those crisp photos we saw during Moto’s...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
14. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5711; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
naturally, all we can decide with that beast around is what is the second best.
18. Birds (Posts: 1162; Member since: 21 Nov 2011)
As far as details go, I'm a bit impressed by the Moto X...it edges out the iPhone though only barely. It has some agressive oversharpening which in turn makes noise levels a bit high. The iPhone has balanced sharpness and overall modest noise levels. The Galaxy S4 does have slightly superior detail but just looking at it, it suffers from some oversharpening and wandering focus. The Nokia Lumia 1020 does have the best detail capture but I'm still disapointed with it.
White balance and color reproduction goes to the Samsung Galaxy S 4 and iPhone. I'll give it tot he iPhone because it is nicely saturated why the Galaxy S 4 tends to over saturate, contributing to slight grain. The Nokia Lumia 1020 wasn't bad at all, I just was a tad bit to unrealistic with its greens and yellows. The Moto X though... Too cold a color reproduction and it is not the most adept at picking white balance.
As far as exposure, all seemed to do decent except the Samsung Galaxy S 4. Not bad but just a tad bit over exposed. the Lumia 1020 seemed to underexpose but it still captures decent shadow detail so I'm not complaining either way.
The Moto X seems like it can pull its own, but it needs some serious software tweekage because the camera is a slight dissapointment. I just wonder how PhoneArena is going to review the camera becuase when they have different reviewers things turn out quite contradictory.
27. MartyK (Posts: 834; Member since: 11 Apr 2012)
I agree 100% with what you saw... That's how I felt looking through the photo, as much as I gave to say it, the iPhone did a dam good job especially on the shot of the tree.
My question is this, why did each camera change the background color?.. Lol.. we need to find out what color the fence and wall was.. Lol
33. belovedson (Posts: 988; Member since: 30 Nov 2010)
not sure what your seeing but the iphones color reproduction is not realistic starting with the first two pics. i am not even going to waste time reviewing your review
38. datapicard (Posts: 2; Member since: 02 Aug 2013)
Most of these comments are revealing a lack of knowledge in digtal photography. let me point out a few things people are overlooking. Resolution asside, the most important aspect of a digital camera is its dynamic range, which is the tonal variation between absolute black and absolute white. If you look at the moto x's compared to the other cameras you will see that in the shadows as well as in the bright parts of the image, there is a significantly more detail compared to the other phones. Look at the street picture with the car in the shot, this is by far the best lighting scenario to test dynamic range. The sky is not blown out to complete white (like the other cameras), it is showing some subtle detail in the blue sky. Now look at the shadows under the tree behind the car, its full of detail and not crushed to black like the other cameras. Looking for detail in bright parts of the image, and shadows will reveal the superior dynamic range in the moto x. This asside the moto x is lacking the overly saturated images the other cameras have, which in my opion look plain wrong, to the untrained eye it probably looks good, buts its not, sorry. To be clear, i'm a filmmaker and visual effects artist so its my job to understand digiatl imaging. also btw, no one seems to care that the moto x has a proper aspect ratio, while the others are close to 4by 3
46. PeterJ (Posts: 1; Member since: 31 Aug 2013)
Thanks for your review. As a non-professional when it comes to photography or digital imaging, I was disappointed in reading the bad reviews about the quality of the Moto X's digital images. I was sold on all the other aspects of the phone. Although I did notice the differences in picture characteristics that everyone was pointing out, I felt that the Moto X's photos looked more realistic. I know it's not the BEST phone for taking pictures, but I feel more confident now in my choice.
2. PhoneCritic (Posts: 693; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)
The S4 and iPhone are the best with the S4 edging out the iPhone. Surprised that the 1020 seems a bit blurry and soften and not as crisp.
3. ebubekir26 (Posts: 321; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)
well not but bad not great either, I actually expected better pictures
26. ebubekir26 (Posts: 321; Member since: 21 Dec 2012)
wtf? I hate it when I accidentaly write a mistake, and I can't edit it after a short amount of time -_-
4. glentomas123 (Posts: 70; Member since: 01 Jun 2011)
Moto X is a complete photographic failure! Is this for what we've been waiting?? Next! This is what you get I guess for a phone priced cheap off contract.
20. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)
Still better than the Nexus 4 by a longshot.
6. Saamic (Posts: 119; Member since: 20 Feb 2012)
The pictures are clear, but the colors don't have much saturation.
8. Pedro0x (Posts: 271; Member since: 19 Oct 2012)
The pictures are great actually. And it is not undersaturated, it is the other phones that are oversaturated.
21. Shatter (Posts: 2036; Member since: 29 May 2013)
This is why every camera comparison needs to have a high end DLSR for references to what the pictures color should actually look like.
7. flynfree (Posts: 374; Member since: 09 Jun 2013)
Moto and Apple, ha ha ha. .. this league are between SGS4 vs nokia, and it looks S4 is edging N1020.
11. Ronny666 (Posts: 122; Member since: 08 Jun 2013)
Well, the Motorola Clearpixel's pictures are exactly how I predicted. Replacing the Green in conventional RGBG to RGBC colour filters will only result washed out green with less accurate colours. All the smartphones above performed better than Moto X. Suprisingly it did not have significant difference in low-light condition. Perhaps the firmware may have not been finalised yet and too soon to judge now.
12. dinzle (Posts: 21; Member since: 03 Dec 2011)
I'd say on par with the rest except the lumia. No beating that. The S4 images look all blown out though.
13. f1r3z0r (Posts: 92; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)
This phone sucks...i think s3 way better...and i still like my s4 zoom...please motorola keep making bluetooth headphone because you are good at it now like s11
15. sprockkets (Posts: 1611; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)
First set of photos I give to the Moto X, last set to the Lumia 1020. First set the flash on it ruined the photo for the Lumia. Last set MotoX is washed out, while the Lumia is over saturated (their default).
Of course I'd have to see the original with my eye to see who really is on target.