x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close





Motorola DROID RAZR HD tutorial videos leaked

0. phoneArena 19 Aug 2012, 14:37 posted on

Some new videos have made their way to YouTube which show the Motorola DROID RAZR HD in action; these tutorial videos are released by Motorola to more easily show the user of the device how to do certain functions on the phone...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:37 1

57. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


How could u not agree 4gb ram, now imagine browsing on your phone with 1gb Android resources take up around 600mb of ram on ics, leaving you around 300, on top if you install 5 to 10 apps your
left with 200mb ram, now try and open 2 tabs loading
4page's the phone starts to lag, then you need to go to task manager every 2 minutes to clear ram. What a joke.... with 4gb ram you wouldn't need to clear ram every few minutes, but 20minutes, don't you find that
really annoying.?

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:41 1

58. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


King Snapdragon mpq8064 is already available, still Motorola have not starting to push S4 @ S4pro let alone the high-end mpq chipsets.....!

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:47 1

59. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


King what you on about tegra2 is, was better than the S2 4410 Exynos..... there is, or will be nothing to beat the Exynos chipsets. That is a fact and logical truth.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:47 3

60. HäckeMáte (Posts: 168; Member since: 28 Feb 2012)


Is this even debatable? HTC has historically had better specs than MOTOROLA.

I can only think of 2 times that Motorola has beat HTC: 1) When the Droid X came out HTC took a while to respond. 2) When the RAZR came out, but the ONE series ended that quick.

The Atrix HD is playing catchup and the Photon Q,,, gimme a break, EVERY site out there clasifies it as a mid-grade. I mean the display is 540 x 960 @ 256 ppi (again catching up cant beat HTC)

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:50 3

61. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


+1 from me hackmate. True said......!

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:52 1

62. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


alright, look guy, the best way to look at it is to look at each company's most relevant and powerful handset from year after year. 2010 was the Droid X for Motorola and then what? HTC's EVO? the Droid X was more powerful so NEXT, 2011 was the Rezound and the Razr, Razr is the winner, next, 2012 we have the One X and the Razr HD and i'm pretty sure they're going to be equal in terms of power so considering that evidence i still wouldn't say that HTC has beaten Motorola in terms of specs, don't get confused because companies don't release their phones right when another does.

i never said they were.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:54 1

63. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


oh i'm sorry, where is the HTC with that again?

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:59 1

65. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


being that the instances you're talking about are with the flagship devices for 2010 and 2011 what more do you need? since that was the case when has HTC surpassed Motorola with phones from the same generation? the Ones came to the US like 7 months after the Razr came out. that's like comparing a Thunderbolt to a Razr.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:01 2

66. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


Its not worth it, TROLL, theres no reasoning with a person that is obsessed with 1 brand. In his eyes nothing is better than motorola.

Sad, cuz I actually want to buy this RAZR HD but not because I am a blind brand lover. Eventually something else WILL be better and I WILL accept it unlike KingK

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:02 1

67. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


dude, i'm talking about the freaking Snapdragon. Galaxy S II = SII, 2nd Generation Snapdragon = S2. this is exactly why i make that distinction.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:07 1

69. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


i'm not biased but i like Motorola for a reason. maybe you missed the parts where i put Motorola second in terms of specs next to Samsung because of FACT. i just have a carefully thought out idea of who is the best in terms of specs. if Samsung made phones with better build quality, better reliability in terms of wireless reception and a UI that has more in common with Stock Android then guess what? i'd have a Samsung.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:13 2

71. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


True agree.... But I love, like the Razor brands of Moto
, but is let down by specs.... just awaiting for there QC version S4 or the omap 4470....
Kingkourggi loves and prides his Motorola!

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:15 1

73. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


O I'm talking about the international S2, and your. Talking about the state's S2, misundersstanding....

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:16 1

74. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


I believe and think both are on par.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:20 2

77. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


yeah, i mean i can agree that it would've been much better for Motorola to have gotten their 2012 act together 2 or 3 months ago so that they could be doing something bigger for the holidays (which we haven't ruled out yet) but i still think Motorola is doing relevant things now. we'll definitely affirm that when the Razr HD is announced.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:21 1

78. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


xD nonono, i mean the S2 processor by Qualcomm in phones like the Thunderbolt and the Droid Incredible 2. i wasn't talking about Samsung's second Galaxy phone at all.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:24 1

79. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


well that kind of goes with what i said except for the few times that Moto opted to use an OMAP instead of a Snapdragon.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:27 1

80. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


King use changed ur Avatar, where's your, or what happened to your, kid, boyface Avatar.....the old one was better!

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:29 1

81. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


Dude you are TOTALLY biased. are you kidding? Every Motorola article you are ALL over it glorifying MOTO.

I even told you how I cant wait for the RAZR HD, but for some reason nobody can say anything good about HTC???

Why is it so hard for you to accept that the HTC One series is clearly better, EVERYBODY knows it its not even up for debate. If you were truly unbiased you would say something more along the lines: "Yes the HTC ONE is currently a better phone, however, I beleive the RAZR HD will beat it and HTC wont respond with a better phone for a while"

but saying "HTC has never had better specs" is the whole reason we are having this discussion.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:30 2

82. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


A Motorola logo would suit him better

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:32 2

83. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


oh but this is the Slenderman! this will scare a bunch more people! xD

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:59

85. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


why would the One X be better?
i mean i like Motorola more but in terms of anything that's not subjective HTC isn't really offering anything more compelling than anybody else out there. i mean i said it was faster than the US SIII, what more do you want from me?

posted on 20 Aug 2012, 00:46

90. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


well except for Beats support, that's pretty neat. if i were to get a Windows Phone it would probably be an HTC.

posted on 20 Aug 2012, 10:38

93. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


You know... I told myself I would not waste my time arguing about this because of how absurd your comments are but, here goes:

RAZR VS ONE
540 x 960 < 1290X720
256ppi < 326ppi
1.2 TI OMAP < 1.5 S4 KRAIT
no NFC < yes NFC
no beats < Beats audio

Please stop wasting my time with this. Ive lost respect for your arguements they hold no weight. If your not gonna be humble and accept being corrected learn to be the bigger man and practice silence.

PS: the ATRIX HD is CURRENTLY the best Moto Handset, and no NFC support (forget beats audio) makes it NOT better than HTC. So dont even go there. This discussion is over.

posted on 20 Aug 2012, 12:59

94. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


why is this so hard for you to understand? the Razr was 2011's Flagship phone, the One is 2012's. the Razr wasn't relevant anymore when the One came out because it was over half a year old. i'm only comparing devices that directly compete with each other like the EVO 4G and the Droid X, the Razr and the Rezound, the One and the Razr HD. that's how this works.

posted on 20 Aug 2012, 13:24

95. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


in your motorola brain thats how it works. in the real world HTC has a better phone out atm.
get over it.

posted on 20 Aug 2012, 13:48

96. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5713; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


no, i'm just staying fair. by your logic it would be okay for me to compare something like a Razr and a Thunderbolt together. that wouldn't be right and i don't have a Motorola brain, i'm just stating the truth, from generation to generation Motorola always prevails over HTC by having the more powerful handsets. that's just how it's been.

posted on 20 Aug 2012, 18:18 1

99. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


King is correct, you shouldn't be comparing a phone that came out in 2011 to one that came out in 2012. Because the Razr is now considered a mid-range because of the latest high-end offerings like the One X, Galaxy S III, etc. You shouldn't compare high-end to mid-range. The Razr is the last-gen flagship for Moto, and we shouldn't compare Moto's offering to anyone else's until they get their current gen flagship out, the Razr HD.

posted on 20 Aug 2012, 18:29

100. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


I know thats why I compared it to the Atrix at the end. My point with him is that he says "has NEVER beat Motorola in Specs"

They are always back to and forth one moment HTC is on top and the next moment Motorola is.

I only compared the RAZR because that was HTCs response to the RAZR and what beat them. But he wants to argue that December 31 of every year is when the winner is picked. It doesnt work that way this is a never ending race. Saying that HTC has never beat Moto is false.

posted on 20 Aug 2012, 18:51 1

103. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Well, technically, HTC was never ahead of Moto in specs. All HTC has been ahead in is development, which just means they got their flagship out first. When you compare flagships, leaving release dates aside, Moto has been ahead of HTC. I love HTC, but Moto just typically releases better flagships specs wise. All HTC has been ahead in is development and overall design. Moto still makes some really good lookin handsets, but I just like HTC's design better.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories