x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options
    Close






Motorola DROID RAZR HD tutorial videos leaked

0. phoneArena 19 Aug 2012, 14:37 posted on

Some new videos have made their way to YouTube which show the Motorola DROID RAZR HD in action; these tutorial videos are released by Motorola to more easily show the user of the device how to do certain functions on the phone...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 19:32 2

30. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


388 ppi? That means you won't be able to see about 80 of the pixels that are in every inch. People don't seem to realize, the average human eye can't see pixels past 300ppi, so you really can't tell the difference between 300 or 450 ppi. You're graphics are just working harder to push pixels you can't even see, which is useless.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 19:51 1

33. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


totally agree, the only way you would appreciate that much ppi is if you put the phone inches from your eyes. A comfortable distance is 18 inches... 320 is more than enough

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:23

51. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


At 388ppi the graphics would be more finer and sharp when zooming in. So in other terms you either up the screen pixels in so that you can get fine in-depth
clarity.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:57 2

64. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


Dude, zooming defeats the whole purpose of more PPI. 388 is rediculous dont you get it. Have you even looked at an iPhone retina? you have to squint and hold it like 6 inches from your face to see the itty bitty letters.

Gaming at 388 would need a serious graphics chip and huge battery (not to mention thermal issues like the iPad3)

Its overkill

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:03

68. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


All merges together 400ppi. PVR sgx 543mp8 or a Mali 400mp8 gpu overclocked to 577ghz along with
1580-1020 resolution will be the stuff of dreams.. withalong side air vents
on side of the phone, so it cools down.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:09

70. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Anythings possible, just like cars, bm 318 to m3s.
Pc i3 to i7. V6 to v12 supercharged twinturbo.
But in phone industry, they don't give or provide you with choices..... How so sad.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:17 3

75. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


haha "side vents" lol

...AND A BLOWOFF VALVE for the turbo u kno.
And a carbonfiber body intead of plastic! And NOS for overclocking!!!

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 23:18 1

76. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Yeap!

posted on 20 Aug 2012, 02:10 2

91. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Look, you completely missed my point. At 388ppi, you wouldn't be able to even see those extra 88 pixels. Why would you waste graphics power and battery life of pixels you can't even see? Its pointless.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 16:17 2

9. master0fursinz (Posts: 104; Member since: 26 Apr 2010)


wow this looks sexy....

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 16:18 1

10. christianqwerty (Posts: 467; Member since: 05 May 2011)


So will it be called the Motorola RAZR HD MAXX 4G LTE ?

posted on 20 Aug 2012, 08:43

92. troutsy (Posts: 316; Member since: 17 Feb 2012)


You forgot something...

Motorola DROID RAZR HD MAXX 4G LTE by google.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 21:40 1

42. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5712; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


all HTC did was beat Moto to the market with a next gen handset, Moto's first next gen handset in the states was the Atrix HD which matches the One X, yeah, Samsung barely beats Motorola in specs, Motorola's OMAP4 devices were barely under Samsung's Exynos 4210 powered devices the OMAP4 powered devices offered LTE support but i still gave Samsung the win and the One X benches better than the US SIII variants now explain to me how what i said was wrong.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 16:44

15. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


I never expect high-end features or specs from Motorola, except batteries.
Samsung and HTC for specs! But I really like the Droid4.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 18:38 3

20. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5712; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


HTC has never beat Motorola in specs and Samsung just barely beats them.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 19:11 1

27. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


King the HTC OneX.
The S2
The S3

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 19:57 2

35. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


The Original Evo, when it came out (in its time) totally beat everything that motorola had out. It wasnt till the RAZR that Moto surpassed HTC but even then Samsung had better specs. Even Right Now the entire HTC ONE line (including the EVO LTE) are better.

KingKurogiii I kno your a Moto fan but cmon, dont be too obsessed there is healthy competition out there.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 20:06 4

37. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


That's true, the One series is better than Moto's line-up currently. But here's the thing, the One Series is HTC's flagships for the year. Moto hasn't gotten their flagship out yet. Yes, the One X and S beat the Razr, but the Razr is Moto's flagship for LAST year. When they get the Razr HD out, Moto will be on top of HTC again

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 20:24 2

39. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


Im sure they will. No doubt that with all the changes Google is making at Motorola they will very likely even beat Samsung. But at the moment, both the GS3 and HTC One have better Specs and I know this may ruffle some feathers but Even Sony has some good specs that can compete with Moto's CURRENT line up.

My comment was in response to KingK that claimed HTC has never beat Motorola in specs, which, according to your comment, you agree, so thanks for backing me up.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 21:48 1

43. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5712; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


the Droid X came out two months after the EVO 4G and was more powerful and Motorola's OMAP4 powered devices beat the pants off of HTC's bogged down S3 powered devices, heck even their Tegra II devices were more powerful than them and that was before the Razr. the Atrix HD and the Photon Q match HTC's entire high-end line-up.

sure there is but look more closely to figure out the standings. in terms of specs between the big boys it's always been HTC, Motorola, Samsung.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 21:49 1

44. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5712; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


don't forget the Atrix HD and the Photon Q, they match the One series and have a lighter UI.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 21:51 1

45. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5712; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


we're not mix-matching phones from different generations here.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:02 2

46. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


your comment said "HTC has never had better specs". I pointed out a time in the past when they in fact DID have better phones than Moto, and others posted a more recent time (present)

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:08 3

47. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


And both of these phones that you mentioned JUST came out. And like you said "they match", not beat, so in fact, they are catching up, which means they were behind HTC.

Not trying to fight just correcting your statement that HTC has never had better specs than Motorola.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:10 1

48. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5712; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


well that's not what i meant. when they were released don't matter so much as when they were relevant. the phones that Motorola puts out to compete with companies like HTC and Samsung usually puts them in second place due to their use of OMAP SoCs which until recently were always ahead of the curb from Snapdragons.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:13 1

49. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5712; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


it didn't need correcting, you just misunderstood it.

we don't compare last year's phones with this year's phones. it doesn't work like that. the Atrix HD and the Photon Q are Motorola's first next gen move in the US this year.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:17 1

50. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Motorola yet haven't announced a Quad-core phone yet. Ompap , Snapdragon vs Exynos processors, 4412 is twice as better than both 4460 and S4 is on par!

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:25 1

52. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5712; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


if that's the kind of comparison you want to do then last year HTC was doing just as bad by not having a dual-core handset like Motorola had the Atrix 4G at he time and the Tegra II is way better than the S2 and the Hummingbird. same kind of comparison, different time frame. see how ridiculous it is?

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:27 3

53. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)


Motorola is still catching up with Samsung and HTC.

posted on 19 Aug 2012, 22:30 2

55. 305Bucko (Posts: 506; Member since: 07 Aug 2011)


Never is pretty clear, no misunderstanding there. If you refer to the original comment by "Troll" he was making a general statement (which I dont agree with) that took into account their history (not this year).

Again, not trying to fight here but perhaps if you werent generalizing you could've stated "this year" after "never".

BTW Atrix HD and Photon are NOT better than the ONE series

http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Motorola- ATRIX-HD,HTC-One-X-AT-T,HTC-EVO-4G-LTE/phones/5718 ,6549,7019

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories