Motorola DROID RAZR HD screen protectors found at Verizon
0. phoneArena 04 Oct 2012, 20:53 posted on
With screen protectors for the Motorola DROID RAZR HD found at Verizon, can the phone be far behind? With the holiday shopping season only weeks away, we would expect to soon see as launch of the Motorola DROID RAZR HD and it long lasting bro', the Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX HD...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. XPERIA-KNIGHT (Posts: 2384; Member since: 08 Aug 2012)
Really like the Razrs but my eyes are set more so on the One X+ and also those new nexuses! lol
3. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5538; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
i was actually not impressed at all by the X+ tbh...
i'm dead set for the Nexuses but this'll definitely be my fall back.
LET'S GET IT ON MOTOROLA & VERIZON!!!
4. XPERIA-KNIGHT (Posts: 2384; Member since: 08 Aug 2012)
with HTC hooking up with sony? how could you not like a beast phone like that especially with it being quad core tegra based......It will have jellybean right out the box, a new sense (4+) and the bench marks surpassed the S4 pro! gaming is going to be amazing on it, jelly bean smooth LAG free experience and overall........an amazing HTC build and design.....tough stuff there man
Razr's are only for verizon and may not get jellybean til the end of this year
5. ilkinandr92 (Posts: 43; Member since: 07 Aug 2012)
just looked at benchmarks Quadrant Tegra3 got 5000 and S4 Quad Krait got 7000 So not sure how Tegra is better
6. XPERIA-KNIGHT (Posts: 2384; Member since: 08 Aug 2012)
you obviously didnt look at the scores from the quad core tegra 3 One X+ running jellybean and clocked at 1.7 ghz cuz it got like 7500+ lolz
7. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5538; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
it's plenty powerful sure but being that it's a highly upclocked Tegra III (which is still built on a 40nm manufacturing process) battery life is going to take a hit and this thing only brings a competitive battery at the entry level now of 2100mAh. Jelly Bean is a certainty for the competing handsets so that's just a temporary thing. i do think it looks better though. i'm glad they made the camera module the same tone of black as the rest of the back. in fact this thing is almost like the Beats Edition idea i had with the Red Buttons and what not.
if i were on AT&T...out of the confirmed handsets i'd get the Optimus G or the 8X over the X+.
8. XPERIA-KNIGHT (Posts: 2384; Member since: 08 Aug 2012)
lol thats funny stuff bro.......so you would get the optimus g because the battery may not be as good as u think?? what about screen on the one x+? what about camera? you do any gaming on phones? gettin an lg over an htc? why?
8X i can see maybe cuz u wanna try a new os but the LG cant stand up to the build quality of an htc, camera, support, and amazing screen and with sense constantly gettin better the UI will be overwhelming indeed
9. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5538; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
no. the Adreno 320 in the S4 Pro is another factor, it's still better than the GeForce graphics in the Tegra III which wasn't really that great to begin with. remember this Tegra III is very highly clocked in comparison to the S4 Pro and since the Pro is more efficient on battery an overclock to 1.8GHz would not only put the Pro well past this Tegra III in terms of power but it also probably won't use any more battery than the Tegra III at 1.7GHz, maybe still even less so and remember the Optimus G has twice as much RAM so yeah, Optimus G even if i did want a mini power hogging gaming rig.
i'm going to be open minded about the build quality of the Optimus G since it's pretty different from anything LG has put out before, LG's Cameras are actually pretty good from what i've seen. i don't know if they're HTC good but remember i'm coming from a Razr and a Galaxy Nexus here, support is a legitimate concern but the screen is subjective. remember LG is far from slouching in the display department and also i like LG's Optimus UI 3.0 especially with what the S4 Pro is making it capable of doing and i don't like Sense. even if it performed well i don't like the look and i don't like how much it's rooted into the OS. never have.
10. XPERIA-KNIGHT (Posts: 2384; Member since: 08 Aug 2012)
cool but you saying the screen is subjective is really not true.....HTC was compared to the iphone 5 and its screen faired slightly better in terms of brightness and clarity....which would make it the best screen on a smartphone today!
you mentioned updates being a legitimate concern? well im pretty sure LG wouldnt be the best route...
ill give you ram but is it really neccessary? not sure
and once again......no jellybean meaning it may stutter even with the extra ram and S4 pro after downloading
overall sense ui is much better han LG UI and an having an HTC phone would make you feel much more secure than having an LG with a terrible history of bad service and support
Can they change it all with this one? maybe but it would be wise to go with good and stable ground than traveling to an unfamiliar land
11. KingKurogiii (Posts: 5538; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)
it definitely is so true. it depends on what you want to look at. i personally want my high contrasts so AMOLED's are the way to go for me.
well LG has never really had a real big Smartphone hit but it's looking like this might just be their first so they may be inclined to start updating quicker.
the more, the better especially with the kind of power that these two are working with.
i have JB, it doesn't make THAT big of a difference and like i said, temporary advantage.
that's completely subjective.
nah, i'll take the unfamiliar land this time. :P