x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Motorola CEO Woodside talks Google

0. phoneArena 29 Dec 2013, 13:32 posted on

The Motorola Moto X and the lower cost Motorola Moto G, are widely assumed to be the first handsets that Motorola has released with major input from corporate parent Google. But originally, the deal to buy Motorola was struck by the crew at Mountain View in order to beef up its patent portfolio. However, the $12.5 billion acquisition has not worked out the way Google had hoped...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 13:50 4

1. Plesman88 (Posts: 4; Member since: 23 Oct 2013)


I disagree with that assessment. Nokia is their closest competitor in term of bringing "access to the mobile web for millions of people". They even have (had?) the same slogan "Bringing the internet to the next billion." - conversations.nokia.com/2010/09/16/bringing-the-in​ternet-to-the-next-billion/

And in my personal opinion, having searched for a good phone below 200 Euro. Only the Nokia Lumia's and Motorola Moto G are worthy contenders, the rest is overpriced crap.

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 16:41 4

8. boosook (Posts: 904; Member since: 19 Nov 2012)


Nokia? Lumia? Oh, come on…

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 20:17 2

9. sri_tech (Posts: 187; Member since: 21 May 2013)


There is truth in what he said.

Lumia 520 is very successful and priced very well. That is the reason why Samsung reduced the prices of Galaxy S duos and also released galaxy core and grand quattro at same prices as 520/620/720.

Sony also released Xperia M, L models at same prices as other Lumias.

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 14:26 2

2. 14545 (Posts: 1060; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)


I don't understand people aversion to plastic, especially in regards to replacing *glass*. Polymers are much more resilient to drop damage than glass ever will be.

Heck, people lauded Moto for the "kevlar" design, and kevlar is made with polymer and carbon.

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 15:25

3. grahaman27 (Posts: 345; Member since: 05 Apr 2013)


because plastic scratches easily. I hate scratches on my screen.

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 15:33 2

4. JerryTime (Posts: 468; Member since: 09 Nov 2013)


How many smartphones do you see now a days with plastic screens?

He's talking about the overall build material not the screens.

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 15:49 1

6. 14545 (Posts: 1060; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)


Well, I was referring to both actually. And the same principles apply with both cases. Overall I would rather plastic over glass or metal anyday. Just a personal preference.

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 16:37 1

7. JerryTime (Posts: 468; Member since: 09 Nov 2013)


I stand corrected LoL.

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 15:45 3

5. 14545 (Posts: 1060; Member since: 22 Nov 2011)


So do glass screens. That's what screen protectors are for. I would rather a device that has a screen that is far less likely to break than one that is less likely to scratch. Generally speaking, in engineering terms, as hardness goes up, ductility goes down proportionally, and brittleness goes up with hardness. You can fix those issues with a tempered glass *cheap* screen protector, or even a plastic screen protector, much easier than replacing the whole glass when it shatters.

posted on 29 Dec 2013, 22:16

10. techloverNYC (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Nov 2012)


Can anyone explain to me how the Moto G match the iphone spec for spec? Does the guy mean the older iphone?

posted on 08 Jan 2014, 11:49

11. jroc74 (Posts: 4720; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)


He probably means in broad, general terms.

Dual core, quad core vs dual core, quad core.

Ram vs ram.

Not A7 64bit cpu vs Moto custom chip

Not 1GB ddr ram vs 1GB ddr3 ram.

Those are just examples....dont know the actual specific specs of each phone.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories