Motorola Adventure V750 coming July 28th
Share:
Motorola Adventure V750 Preliminary Specifications
source: Engadget Mobile
Share:
34 Comments
1. (unregistered) posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:42 0 0
I work for vzw and we had a training on this phone and the new PTT service... the phone is actually not that bad and the PTT service is excellent. But then again it is motorola so I would expect software issues
19. peaches posted on 14 Jul 2008, 12:52 0 0
since you work for vzw, will LG be updating the voyger with voyger 2
2. (unregistered) posted on 10 Jul 2008, 20:13 0 0
so how much is the next gen PTT anyone know or is it the 10 dollars like it is now?
33. (unregistered) posted on 25 Nov 2008, 14:49 0 0
5 dollars unlimited but only works if your buddies are on verizon PTT as well
3. (unregistered) posted on 10 Jul 2008, 21:19 0 0
Why does the v950 have to wait til 9/2 if the cousin is coming 7/28
4. (unregistered) posted on 10 Jul 2008, 21:34 0 0
It's another dime a dozen crappy verizon phone. Get with it verizon!
13. (unregistered) posted on 11 Jul 2008, 18:29 0 0
dude Verizon didn't make that phone, Motorola did! If anything blame Motorola.
5. motoman117 posted on 10 Jul 2008, 22:26 0 0
man, what is so bad about this phone? if it were a frikin LG or samsung, u guys would be like "oh yah, not bad, not bad." But you just like to rip on moto b/c they arent doing well right now. Someone tell me what is so wrong with this phone? For only $100 you get verizon's PTT, EV-DO rev. A, 2 megapixel camera, 1170 mAH battery, VZ navigator, V cast music and TV, micro SD expansio, (up to 8GB), military spec, and MP3 playback! I dont like VZ, but I have been lookin forward to the launch of the V950 on sprint since march, and i jsut dont get why people HATE these 2 phones so much..
11. Carter (unregistered) posted on 11 Jul 2008, 12:24 0 0
ok first off ive had 2 motorolla phones (V325i, and the V3m RAZR) both of them sucked.All of motorolla's phones have horrible batteries (they arent quality so you have to keep buying more of them. As well as horrible parts inside them which makes them slow slow and slower than any other lg or samsung phone ive had because of the bad expiriences ive had with motorola i dont ever want to go back. THANKS MOTOROLA BECAUSE OF THE CRAPPY PHONES I BOUGHT FROM U IVE LEARNED NEVER TO DO BUSINESS WITH U AGAIN HOPE U GET BETTER!!!!!
15. motoman117 posted on 12 Jul 2008, 19:08 0 0
Ok, basically this just proved my point. First of all, you couldnt find ANYTHING wrong with this phone, the second, and funniest, is that you actually didnt name anything wrong with your phone. The FACT is that motorola actually puts better batteries in their phones! Im sure you didnt know that if a moto battery goes bad, it can be replaced, if an LG batter goes bad...tough luck! Now as far as battery quality as concerned, lets take the razr V3m. It came out in 2006 with a 740 mAH battery, the BRAND NEW samsung SCH-U550 has an 800 mAH battery....so? The new moto W755 which replaced the razr has a 950 mAh battery, and the SCH-U550 is more expensive than the W755! So you are just wrong. Now, the "horrible parts inside them which makes them slow slow and slower." This comment makes me wonder why I am even arguing... It really needs no explaining. The points you made can be argued, but you dont have any concrete issues, like "the phone has shorter battery life than blank phone, or, only 1.0 bluetooth when blank phone has 2.0 bluetooth. Im still wondering why everyone hates this phone. I guess that bottom line is people just dont like motorola, which is too bad. Carter, im sorry if you had bad experiences with your moto phones, but I know 5 people who had the razr, 3 were very close friends. They all had them for 2 years and loved them. One still has a razr, and the other will get another moto product, probably the razr2! Motorola makes fine phones, just look at the reviews. Everyone has poor phones and excellent phones, and just b/c moto is in the gutter now doesnt mean you have to kick them while they are down.
6. (unregistered) posted on 11 Jul 2008, 07:10 0 0
Moto will always have a following because IDEN
7. (unregistered) posted on 11 Jul 2008, 08:22 0 0
I'm not sure why every rips on Moto. I've had LG in the past and returned them within a week because of poor signal strength. I've had my E815 for 3 years!
8. (unregistered) posted on 11 Jul 2008, 08:26 0 0
the last good phone they made was the v60c. the 815 was ok, but most people only hold onto theirs b/c it was one of the last vzw ui holdouts and you could seam edit the hell out of it. reception was stellar, but the s/w was still buggy and god knows the charging ports were the wost ever designed. chances are that if you owned one 815 its been swapped out three or four times. to motoman...motorola has done well to earn their crappy reputation. just b/c a phone has features doesnt mean it works
9. (unregistered) posted on 11 Jul 2008, 08:35 0 0
I've never had software issues with my E815 and I've never had to have it swapped....I still have the original one. Guess I was lucky. I agree that the charging port is a bad design. That's why I'm looking to get a new phone - I have to fiddle with it to get the phone to charge. The problem is I'm not sure what new phone to get. I don't want touch screen or a full keyboard....I just need a phone with excellent call quality and signal strength.
10. (unregistered) posted on 11 Jul 2008, 12:01 0 0
the E815 was an exception is Motorola's product line-up. That phone performed very well. But if u want good call quality and strength stick with LG
27. Davz (unregistered) posted on 30 Jul 2008, 10:21 0 0
Why? So we can all have software bugs that causes our phones to shut off after sending every 2nd picture message? (The bug with the VX-8700) Don't get me wrong, I love LG. But I've had a lot of nice motorola phones too. The V60, RAZR (Of course you're going to see a lot of these with problems, like 50% of the entire cell phone using population uses one, but I've never had a problem with the 2 of mine, the W755. But not making this phone waterproof was a mistake :( just spray it with some instant plastic or something. Shrink wrap it or melt a zip lock bag over it.. something!
12. shadows (unregistered) posted on 11 Jul 2008, 14:53 0 0
i work at verizon... i see motorolas come in everyday with problems. tons of them. i went through 6 razrs and two slvers myself before giving up on them.... all crap. i just want to know- is this damn phone waterproof... i have a pool guy coming into my store every two weeks to buy a new phone cuz he's always dropping his in the water.
14. (unregistered) posted on 12 Jul 2008, 12:17 0 0
maybe your guy should start leaving his phone in the car......phones are not waterproof can get water resistant but your talking about a hand held computer.......would you want to hold your laptop over a pool? I've had my black q sense it came out and not had problems other than shutting off after i've dropped it million times........yeah razr is not that great the krazr is worse but the w315 was good and the w385 also the Z6c and Z6tv....been doing this for 6 yrs so stop all the haten people god.
16. some guy (unregistered) posted on 12 Jul 2008, 21:19 0 0
it is not water proof, it meets more rugged specs than the Boulder does, EXCEPT it is not water proof/resistant. Nada. Zilch. Splashing bad!
28. Davz (unregistered) posted on 30 Jul 2008, 10:26 0 0
Using your logic, why make it ruggedized then? The G'Zones had the right idea. The Type V was a flop because of that silly bumper thing and the external antenna. The Type S was a flop because the idiots decided to downgrade it when they fixed the Type V's aesthetic issues. I predict the Adventure is going to be a flop for not being waterproof. The Boulder may be too.. I'm skeptical due to it's looks, and I haven't checked to see if it's waterproof yet either.








