x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Options

Mobile Competition Part 1: What OS is best for you

0. phoneArena 23 Sep 2011, 12:31 posted on

Part 1 of 2 covering iOS, Android and the smaller competing platforms, the strengths and weaknesses of each, and why you might choose one over another. Part 2 will focus on the overall competition and its effect on the mobile space...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 18:21

98. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

can you get anymore ***?

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 16:43 6

84. snowgator (Posts: 3604; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)

Okay, let's face it, and since no one else wants to say it, I will:

1) Yes, Miz is Miz. But, does anyone here really, really think he doesn't do the things he does and say what he says to get under peoples skin? If you take him too seriously, that is your own fault. I personally think it would be a lot more dull around here without him. So long as he keeps the pictures of his name sake fully clothed, I am glad he is here. So there.

2) Say anything you want about Gemini- I have learned a lot from him. And I haven't seen a lot of personal slams from him. He hasn't posted as much as he used too. I think that is a loss.

3) Peter is Peter. Bada is the solution to world hunger and mobile shortcomings. Nuff said. Besides, a lot of people have taken personal shots at him, he has yet to do the same. He has done a ton to get Bada in our mind. How is that bad?

4) Most of the usual suspects who are Android backers are level headed and just give their opinion and call it that: An opinion. What more can you ask?

This is my Mobile gossip home. I enjoy posting, debating, and learning here. I think the writers have gotten better and better. The reviews are top notch. And I wouldn't trade the community for any others. Go read other web sites comments- very rarely are they as knowledgable as the threads on here. I have said all along Phone Arena should cut a check to some of you.

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 17:01 6

86. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

gemini goes back and forth between informative and rabbid fanboy.

peter is nuts, but i love peter, because hes nuts but at least he is polite. :)

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 18:10 2

91. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

Michael good article overall, but to say remix has logic and accuracy makes you lose credibility. Like bio said he claims t-mobile is faster than VZW lte and also makes outlandish claims about the iPhone on a regular basis. When speaking strictly about android then he's pretty reasonable, but he's definitely a huge fanboy.

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 18:12

92. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

I state facts you don't like

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 18:19 1

96. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

you defend android against fanboys on Apple articles all day lol. When have you ever defended Apple?

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 18:20 2

97. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

iPhone had multitasking on the original iPhone and after. It's just after the app store launched they didn't allow multitasking on 3rd party apps. Native apps have always multitasked on iPhone.

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 18:22 1

99. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

I agree that you're actually impartial, but anbots don't accept impartial if you say something positive about iOS.

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 18:33 4

100. Sniggly (Posts: 7305; Member since: 05 Dec 2009)

Lol, you're such a thug, Taco. You insult me for being a geek, you use a "g..ay" insult...what jock stereotype DON'T you fit in?

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 19:41 3

108. RORYREVOLUTION (Posts: 3115; Member since: 12 Jan 2010)

And apparently I am a SGS2 fanboy. Because I like a great android phone that's free of lag and has a gorgeous huge display with plenty of memory and space.

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 21:16 1

128. biophone (Posts: 1994; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)

Its funny how you said i am not accurate about what you said. Then you go and defend the ludacris statements. The iphone was always a smartphone i dont even need to defend that position. Your point about tmos data is irrevalant. Its mostly based on your speed tests and tmo gets great service by you

posted on 24 Sep 2011, 00:11

157. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

maybe u should actually read my comments instead of just blindly replying to them. Ive agreed with you probably 4 times this week. I defend any OS against inaccuracies. I dont have a vested interest in any of them as i dont own any stocks. They dont pay me, they dont own me, and they dont control me. Unlike "AHEM" some people, if you actually read through my comments, you will see I'll go after anything I think is inaccurate on any side.

its not my fault that your track record is mostly wrong.

posted on 24 Sep 2011, 00:14

158. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

proving my point, taco says that your impartial. he doesnt think anyone is impartial that doesnt agree with him, as proven time and time again by his posts and responces... not whatever he is about to say in rebuttal to this. He has called Gallito fair handed too. Anyone agree? lol

thanks for helping me taco.

posted on 24 Sep 2011, 00:14 1

159. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

if you stated a fact, i would like it.

posted on 24 Sep 2011, 03:54

170. XiphiasGladius (Posts: 813; Member since: 21 Aug 2011)

Amen to that!

posted on 24 Sep 2011, 05:59 1

174. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

if your talking about the ability to play music in the background. ya know.. that 1 and only thing it would allow you to do.. and only while doing certain things like play on the internet...

no thats not multitasking.

posted on 24 Sep 2011, 12:52

189. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

bio, that doesnt even make sense..

my point about Tmo's data is irrelevant because it WORKS by me?!?!?! lol. sooo... am i the only person in the country under 42mb/s HSPA+? No.. no im not. So i dont get the point your trying to make.

posted on 24 Sep 2011, 15:41

207. biophone (Posts: 1994; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)

If i am not impartial that makes me a android and a isheep

posted on 24 Sep 2011, 22:17

222. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

so.. you have to be one or the other huh? cant just have a preference without having to go to idiot fanboy levels. yup, your definately not impartial if you think that..lol

posted on 25 Sep 2011, 00:18

229. E.N. (Posts: 2610; Member since: 25 Jan 2009)

Yeah I'm not going to sugar-coat it. It does make you lose credibility because they are very much fanboys. And Michael it makes you look like a fanboy too because you can't see that they are fanboys! lol. I've never seen a writer kiss so much ass in my life! My gawd. Its entertaining and sickening all at the same time.

Remixfa, you don't always comment with logic and accuracy. That's bull****, haha. You always inject your negativity whenever anything good about Apple is reported.And I don't want to get into another argument of whether or not the iPhone is a smartphone, but believing so strongly that the iPhone wasn't a smartphone is a perfect example of your fanboyism. Along with the people who review smartphones for a living, I bet even the CEOs of Google, HTC, and your best friend Sammy would say that iPhone is and was a smartphone.

posted on 25 Sep 2011, 07:56

237. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)

sure, if you bend the rules of a smartphone and take out most features that other smartphones had when the iphone launched, was it a smartphone.

sorry but i dont believe in dumbing down standards to fit more people. If it doesnt have smartphone features, its not a smartphone.

And if u actually read anything ive written, i also said android wasnt a smartphone when it launched either... so how does that make me an android fanboy exactly???

you ibots are like the sith.. if your not with you, your against you.. there is no room for actual thinking people, which is why i could never be like you.

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 11:09 2

29. protozeloz (Posts: 5396; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)

Two things regarding android and multiple cores I would like To mention.

1. For a device to run a dual core processor it must beimplemented in the OS now while this is true its also true that the os must be designed by google to offer the best implementation. Even with that Apps need to be rebuild to work too.

2. The stand over quad core could be somewhat mistaken, there has being a stand about android supporting multiple cores on ICS, not just 2,an example is the ubuntu kernel that supports over 1k cores even if that number is not on Sale for normal users, there Is already a game that supports more that two. Cores so android migh come with support for more than just 2

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 11:12 1

32. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2707; Member since: 26 May 2011)

edited, thanks for the catch

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 16:52

85. snowgator (Posts: 3604; Member since: 19 Jan 2011)

I agree. I do get tired of the dual core argument. Sure, WP could put a dual core in just to have one in. But the OS doesn't support it. For that matter, Android really doesn't either until Ice Cream Sandwich get's unleashed. Gingerbread is running well on them, but it is ICS that will be devloped to take advantage of it. That is why it is important to get a dual core Android now- within 2 years, the update will support it. WP is getting Mango to every existing handset out there. That is a great bonus, even without dual core. Blackberry didn't support older devices with OS7, and these devices running OS7 will not get QNX. That is worth pointing out, that they are not dupported in the future. Not that WP and iOS do not have dual core even when they do support their devices very well.

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 11:10 2

30. Tmachaveli (Posts: 425; Member since: 01 Apr 2011)

this was a real good article nice job Mike

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 11:22 1

34. BenCjamin (Posts: 80; Member since: 13 May 2011)

Best objective article i've read from Phonearena! I love the analysis. I can't wait to read part two in this segment.

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 11:27 2

35. ilia1986 (unregistered)

Awesome article, Michael. I don't agree with every single point mentioned - but it's definitely one of the best if not the best article on PA ever. Just shows how talented you are as a writer and a journalist.


Btw did you hear, taco? An independent person, who is a highly regarded writer and is objective - said that iOS is not better than anything else out there. Oh my god, taco what are you going to do? Surely accuse Michael here of being an Android fanboy, right?

Same applies to Miz, Gallitoking, gemini and many other blind iSheep. YOU WERE WRONG. It's official now. And with Samsung kicking Apple's butt - your blind fanaticism will become more useless than hot air balloons after the invention of the helicopter.

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 11:46 6

41. roldefol (Posts: 4362; Member since: 28 Jan 2011)

Umm, isn't rubbing the fanboys' noses in it exactly what this article is NOT about? "Nyaaaah you don't win, therefore you LOSE!"

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 18:14

93. taco50 (banned) (Posts: 5506; Member since: 08 Oct 2009)

You claim iOS is way inferior to android so what is your point? Typing in all caps doesn't make you right by the way

posted on 23 Sep 2011, 21:20

129. biophone (Posts: 1994; Member since: 15 Jun 2011)

You missed the point of the article.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories