Microsoft Surface Pro 2 vs Apple iPad 4 vs Google Nexus 10: Silicon Valley MMA
0. phoneArena 24 Sep 2013, 05:23 posted on
We are pitting the current "vertical integration" tablets of the Silicon Valley's big three household names - Microsoft, Apple and Google - to gauge the different paths they are taking into creating their own hardware to go with their renowned software. Of course, both Google and Microsoft are new at this game, introducing their own tablets just last year, whereas Apple has been a vertically integrated maker for decades now. Still, the Windows and Android brains did very well, and now with the introduction of Surface Pro 2 Microsoft has a chance to be commercially successful as well. Let's see who did what here...
This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here
1. papss (unregistered)
The tablets shouldn't even be compared to a i5 powerhouse..
3. android_hitman (Posts: 610; Member since: 07 Jul 2010)
how can you compare x86 architecture vs arm!!!
are you that limited? surface pro 2 runs FULL WINDOWS NATIVE APPS....
this is another PA article to BIAS M$ latest release.. and surface 2 pro is really the best tablet out there
6. papss (unregistered)
That's what I mean dude.. Its not even a comparison.
13. android_hitman (Posts: 610; Member since: 07 Jul 2010)
i was referring to PA not to you :)
44. softfurryanus (banned) (Posts: 232; Member since: 09 Jul 2013)
Unfortunately PA doesn't care.. Remember iPhone 5 vs Note 3 comparison a few weeks ago? Yea, pretty soon they'll post "Old Spice deodorant vs the Galaxy Note 10.1's S-pen"
8. TylerGrunter (Posts: 911; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)
I don't agree it's the best. They just play in different categories.
Ipad 4 and Nexus 10 are tablets, the Pro 2 is a laptop replacement.
How can you compare a tablet that costs DOUBLE and WEIGHTS 300 grams more?
The one they should be comparing to is the Surface 2, both for price and use!
24. protozeloz (Posts: 5375; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
I don't even know why they are comparing these, with the pro... Its not even in the same price category
41. downphoenix (Posts: 2329; Member since: 19 Jun 2010)
why did they compare the surface 2 pro instead of the surface 2? Its obvious the pro smashes the others in performance and quality.
2. timezone (Posts: 80; Member since: 16 Jun 2013)
The surface tablets are amazing. Get rid of the fan, make it lighter, thinner and less costly. Then I'm all in.
22. Shatter (Posts: 2024; Member since: 29 May 2013)
Until Intel gets some more power reduction they can't use thegood i5s without the fan, wait a few years they are working on getting laptop chips into tablets that can be passively cooled.
37. haseebzahid (Posts: 1827; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)
turns out it might take another 5 years to get it cheaper after more OEMS make a true Surface pro Competitor like sony and HP are doing
4. sri_tech (Posts: 188; Member since: 21 May 2013)
Even the low res surface RT display beat retina iPAD display in many cases.
I am sure the new 1080p display will do even better.
27. pookiewood (Posts: 589; Member since: 05 Mar 2012)
I work in Tech and people are always bashing RT. I actually want and RT device. I'd prefer 8-9" so I'll probably wait until the end of the year to see what all comes out before picking one. I have a very capable Laptop and PC. RT is perfect for me as a browsing/app device.
5. scriptwriter (Posts: 396; Member since: 13 Nov 2012)
value for money = Nexus 10 wins everytime. I might buy one......oh wait...i already did!!!
7. volcano (Posts: 254; Member since: 25 Jan 2013)
Surface Pro 2 wins Build quality hardware spec runs desktop apps Tablets apps its a workstation/tablet/laptop when you need it
It a Pro Machine
21. protozeloz (Posts: 5375; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
Well its kinda the cheapest
And is one of the most portable
39. 1113douglas (Posts: 191; Member since: 04 Jul 2013)
in every way, and every aspect the nexus 10 is the best.if you want the best tablet out their though, i wouldn't recommend it. i would recommend the galaxy note 10.1 2014 edition. thats by FAR the best tablet worldwide
14. jellmoo (Posts: 669; Member since: 31 Oct 2011)
Why on earth would you use the Pro as opposed to the Surface 2 for this comparison? The Surface 2 is designed for the same target market as the iPad and the Nexus 10, the Pro is not.
23. protozeloz (Posts: 5375; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)
You sir scored the jackpot! The surface pro is meant to compete against laptops and notebooks, even tho I'll still buy ASUS offering over this, its a great deal
29. rodneyej1 (Posts: 3546; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)
YOU ARE RIGHT❗... This guy is extremely biased, and is obviously trying to make the Surface look bad... Even when he points out it's strong points he has to finish with something negative... A fair review would've been done with the Surface 2.... Typical PA BS.... What is the Surface 2 priced at like $499❔.... What an idiot..
15. rperki8 (Posts: 3; Member since: 21 Sep 2011)
Correction in display section:
says: unsurpassed 200ppi pixel density
should be: unsurpassed 300ppi pixel density
16. nlbates66 (Posts: 296; Member since: 15 Aug 2012)
So why compare the x86 Core i5 powered Surface Pro 2 with ARM powered tablets?
This is like me saying the Apple and Android tablets are useless because they don't run steam, counterstrike, Heroes of newerth, World of tanks, Diablo 1-2-3, Path of exile, Mirrors Edge, Homeworld 2, League of Legends, WoW etc, while my Surface Pro does.
18. speckledapple (Posts: 879; Member since: 29 Sep 2011)
i must admit this article is a bit pointless when comparing two very different types of products that are leagues away from each other in terms of production and capabilities. Tablets are for one purpose, consumption. The Pro 2 is some far far beyond simply consumption and that is why they do not compare.
30. rodneyej1 (Posts: 3546; Member since: 06 Jul 2013)
I agree with you, buy I'm sick of people defining what tablets are for.. A tablet is for whatever the consumer needs it for.. Before there were only iPads, and Android tablets. Now, things have changed and with the Surface the expectations of a tablet is much more than just consumption.. Tablets are still relatively new to the market, so to definitely label what they are exclusively for at this point is strictly closed minded, and naive.... If you are a early adopter of a tablet like device then don't expect for future tablet like devices to follow the limitations of what you are used to...
25. nlbates66 (Posts: 296; Member since: 15 Aug 2012)
ok, so perhaps the author felt they came closer to comparable because the Surface Pro 2's battery life is so significantly improved, reducing the gap slightly? (exception of performance and weight of course)
as far as noise goes, the surface pro doesn't start revving fans unless you actually start hammering the processor, like with a game of World of Tanks, I expect the haswell variant to be slightly quieter in this regard, outside games or compiling stuff I've found the fans are usually off.
26. anirudhshirsat97 (Posts: 390; Member since: 24 May 2011)
This comparison is useless.
It's like comparing an Audi R8 and a Lamborghini Gallardo with a Bugatti Veyron supersport
28. Suo.Eno (Posts: 173; Member since: 17 Feb 2013)
Should have been this way as far apples and oranges go (pun well intended):-
"The base model Air 11” that we’re looking at today has the i5-4250U, a 1.3GHz part with max turbos of 2.6/2.3GHz (1C/2C) and Intel’s HD 5000 onboard graphics with a max GPU clock of 1GHz."
Against the Surface Pro 2, at RRPs MS should have went straight for the jugular by using the same SKU alas they opted for the weaker Haswell SKU = i5 4200U/HD 4400. At $100 less than the MBA starting price at USD999, key specs left are better portability, FHD + touch + Wacom enabled screen. But the MBA wins at 64Gb extra storage and the sure as hell better performing Haswell i5 4250U/HD 5000 firepower. Shouldn't have been tablet for tablet but for best mobile PC period in that sense of targeting.
I won't even waste my time for the Surface 2 because imho going for Tegra 4 has been a shot in the foot on MS' part. Intel Bay Trail Atom Z3770 to me are a better fit and I don't care how MS slice or dice it, they should make RT work for that by hook or crook. Because RT + ARM based SoCs = no dice, sorry RT fans but maybe better for enterprise deployment at the lower rungs than Pro 2's. Consumer against the likes of iOS or Android? Afaics Tegra 4 isn't that much of a Snapdragon 800 killer and as much as I'm an Apple critic it sure as hell have no prayer against the might of Apple's A7 that may or may not actually be a more powerful A7X in the upcoming iPad 5.
The good news here is; MS now knows what they need to do for the 3rd installment of the Surface saga...that is...if they know what's good for them.
31. nlbates66 (Posts: 296; Member since: 15 Aug 2012)
not sure what you're trying to say, RT doesn't run on x86 ATOM processor's it's for ARM processors, and the best thing about RT's existence is it makes sure Intel keeps pushing to catchup in the processor power efficiency race against arm processors.
34. Suo.Eno (Posts: 173; Member since: 17 Feb 2013)
That's precisely the problem. RT + WP = something that MS need to address and fast. I'll clarify; cryptically that's what I meant by making RT work for Bay Trail, it just can't. Tablet OS and phone OS. It's a predicament. 2 separate tablet plays to be exact, which isn't wrong unless played haphazardly.
It's more of a branding nightmare.
A Tegra 4 tablet w/ a relevant OS (for sake of argument let's use Android) against a sea of similarly specced and priced rivals are already a number in the statistic. Even far worse when RT's app ecosys are downright inferior to both Android and iOS. So what exactly are RT + ARM strategy for? A temporarily light ver of Windows for lower power ARM SoCs that can run Office? A stopgap measure? Why?
When or if Intel or AMD for that matter hits the ARM power : batt life parity soon enough, then what is the use case for RT when Win8.1, 9 or 10 can/should run just as easily by then?
Fyi I don't think Intel really considers RT as one of their primary motivator for their mobile SoC push, if at all going by their Android-IA efforts (https://01.org/android-ia/).
47. nlbates66 (Posts: 296; Member since: 15 Aug 2012)
no app store has hundreds of thousands of applications on it from the get go, RT's benefit is that Windows store apps for both x86 and ARM can be compiled at once and use the same store(both touch and desktop), as far as Windows phone goes, Microsoft is intending to merge the Windows store and Windows phone store API's together, like with the app numbers that's just not something that can just be done instantly.
33. remixfa (Posts: 13906; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)
Regardless of any bias that people claim, the intro to the article is way off. Apple has been in vertical markets for decades while Microsoft just got into it???? What are you smoking? Microsoft nearly invented the handheld and tablet markets over a decade ago. A success? Maybe not, bit they pioneered both tablets and PDAs while apple was still begging Jobs to come back and save it from extinction.
38. TROLL (banned) (Posts: 4851; Member since: 13 Apr 2012)
Wow posting after a very long time!
Where have you been?
How is you?
Where and how is Taco50? I've found him on BGR
Really good to see you back!
Miss your great posts
35. YuLeven (Posts: 49; Member since: 14 May 2013)
You got to be joking when you mark a Haswell Core i5 as an 'average processor' in your charts and the puny ARM little cores of the A6X and Exynos 5 of the iPad 4 and the Nexus 10, respectively, as 'fast processor'. You would need dozens of those ARM cores to match Core i5-4200U's performance.
36. brrunopt (Posts: 508; Member since: 15 Aug 2013)
OMFG , what the hell it this , a core i5 is many times more powerfull than any ARM, why does it has a lower score ??
also, comparing a Full fledge PC to tablet that run a limited OS , what the hell ?
40. Walter.D.DROID (Posts: 25; Member since: 01 Apr 2012)
What if, next year, Apple would release an iPad (6) with OSX? If Microsoft can do it? I would not Apple? I love Surface pro 2 but the prices ruins everything.
42. sunnyfpy (Posts: 51; Member since: 12 May 2013)
Microsoft Surface Pro 2 Over priced item that have lousy specs that does not meet customer needs.Nothing new.
43. rusticguy (Posts: 2828; Member since: 11 Aug 2012)
With Surface Pro 2, M$ and Intel are again trying to walk hand in hand across to Wall Street. Last attempt failed "moderately".
46. Genersis (Posts: 188; Member since: 29 May 2013)
Wouldn't it of been better to wait for the new Nexus 10 that's rumoured before doing this comparison?
48. 7thspaceman (Posts: 1085; Member since: 14 Feb 2011)
well folks at least you get a nice side by side chart showing the specs of these devices. Like I saod before there are now 2 types of tablets on the market which are the general touch screen apps only tablets like the Ipads, Android tablet, and the windows Rt amd Nsw Surface 2 tablets and
there are the other type the PC Tablets like the surface Pro 1 and 2 and the MS OEM Windows 8 or coming Windows 8.1 MS OEM tablets. One type is for consumption and the other type is for business production what a person buys is dependeant upon what you want to do with your tablet and how mich cash you can afford to pay for it. I think the Surface Pro tablets are great working tablets but they are too expensive for a lot of people to BUY! I truly
think Microsoft has to make a cheaper Plastic case Windows 8.1 tablet and sell it for 350 to
400 dollars.or elase Microsoft wont sell many Tablets causinf Android and Apple Ipads to still dominate the tablet market. Yoo Microsoft Make a cheaper Windows 8.1 Tablet PLEASE! if you want to stay in the tablet business