x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Options
    Close




Made in USA - Samsung's new Texas foundry to produce Apple's A5 processors, possibly A6 as well

0. phoneArena 16 Dec 2011, 03:08 posted on

Samsung built a $3.6 billion non-memory chip foundry in Austin to allegedly ramp up production of Apple's A5 and even A6 chipsets, adding to a NAND flash memory plant it has had there since 1996...

This is a discussion for a news. To read the whole news, click here

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 03:40 10

1. Bluedroid (Posts: 57; Member since: 12 Sep 2011)


Apple Iphone should be branded samsung inside (like intel inside) !

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 03:58 3

2. tacohunter (Posts: 408; Member since: 06 Nov 2011)


It's not a samsung designed chip but an apple A5 chip. Samsung makes them for apple.

Nonetheless that would be funny indeed

+1

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 09:55 9

6. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


Make no mistake, it is a samsung chip. They call it "apple designed" because there is a slight modification to the chip. The only real difference between the A5 and the Exynos is that apple changed out the GPU and went with the stronger PowerVR. The rest is apple marketing to make u think that they are really doing the lifting.. when they are not.

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 10:19 2

8. tacohunter (Posts: 408; Member since: 06 Nov 2011)


I did some googling first to reply. I know you love talking about chips (not the food xD)

Personally i don't think there the same, but they use both ARM holdings technology. I think apple started from ARM holdings technology not from the Exynos. Because of the release date (maybe) I think it's a bit underclocked because of batterly life a prior in iPhones. And yes apple changed out the GPU and went with the stronger PowerVR. So it's not all about marketing. But certainely it is a part of it.

Here i found a comparisment and remix is right:
http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-apple-a5-and-vs-samsung-exynos-4210/

Remix i'm impressed how do you know so much about these kind of stuffs. Did you search it or do you just kow it?

+1 for having such a great knowledge about this.

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 12:34 1

9. iamcc (Posts: 1319; Member since: 07 Oct 2011)


I think remix just keeps up on new chips and stuff... obviously as new information comes out he has to read up on it but he always seems quick on his feet with responses to anything regarding processors.

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 14:26 1

10. greathero1 (Posts: 460; Member since: 13 Jun 2008)


How would you know who was doing the heavy lifting? Why cannot Apple design their own chips and take their plans to Samsung to produce? If it was just an Exynos with all of those Samsung patents, would they really let Apple take the design to let somebody else manufacture it for them? Apple does have R&D facilities set up for things like this so why could they not have started with ARM architecture and do a little heavy lifting? Since the A5 was released a little earlier than the Exynos, why is it hard to believe that Samsung maybe took some ideas from the latter or whatever? Just questions bro.

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 15:09 1

13. tacohunter (Posts: 408; Member since: 06 Nov 2011)


@greathero1

If samsung will manufacture it doesn't mean it's a samsung design chip. And they got similarities. But A5 is directly designed on ARM technology and the Exynos also. They're almost the same chip. So samsung will clearly make this chip with the quality that apple wants. Ask remix he knows almost everything of this topic.

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 04:01 5

3. tacohunter (Posts: 408; Member since: 06 Nov 2011)


Qoute:

"Samsung, which seems to be the only one with the capacity to produce 28nm chips with enough yield and quality to satisfy Apple's demands"

Quality and yield also very important to apple and samsung.

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 08:59

4. kshell1 (Posts: 1143; Member since: 05 Oct 2011)


it would be funny if samsung made a really crappy processor but on test model rigged it to be good so they think its good at apple but then consumers hate it cause its only like 400mhz or something :p SABOTAGE B!TCHES

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 09:54 1

5. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


just as a note its "governer perry" not "government". :)

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 09:56 1

7. remixfa (Posts: 13902; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


its good to see more jobs coming back to america. Im sure its not an amazing coincidence that the jobs are going to a state with very low tax barriers.. you know.. because they increase job growth. Something to think about.

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 14:49 1

12. greathero1 (Posts: 460; Member since: 13 Jun 2008)


Again, great to see these jobs come to the great state of Texas! Which is my home state by the way. Just had to stick that in there lol. As for low tax barrier states, that is not an absolute and there are many other factors to consider. Politics aside, if you look at employment statistics from Dept of Labor released toward the end of Nov, California created 239,000 jobs from Oct 10 - Oct 11 while Texas had created 231,600. California is the 2nd highest tax state in the country. Using that reasoning, South Dakota, New Hampshire, Delaware, and Rhode Island would be hoarding all the jobs but that is not the case.

posted on 16 Dec 2011, 14:46 1

11. greathero1 (Posts: 460; Member since: 13 Jun 2008)


Great to see these jobs come to the great state of TX!

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories